| Literature DB >> 29312900 |
Ping Liu1, Jinbiao Zhao1, Pingting Guo1, Wenqing Lu1, Zhengying Geng1, Crystal L Levesque2, Lee J Johnston3, Chunlin Wang1, Ling Liu1, Jie Zhang4, Ning Ma1, Shiyan Qiao1, Xi Ma1,5.
Abstract
Solid-state fermentation of feedstuffs by Bacillus subtilis MA139 can reduce insoluble dietary fiber content in vitro and improve growth performance in pigs. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary corn bran (CB) fermented by B. subtilis on growth performance and gut microbiota composition in finishing pigs. A total of 60 finishing pigs were allocated to 3 dietary treatments consisting of a control (CON) diet, a 10% CB diet, and a 10% fermented CB (FCB) diet in a 21 d feeding trial. Growth performance and nutrient digestibility were evaluated. Fecal samples were determined for bacterial community diversity by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The dietary CB and FCB did not affect growth performance of finishing pigs. The digestibility of organic matter was decreased in both CB and FCB treatments compared with CON group (P < 0.05). The α-diversity for bacterial community analysis of Chao 1 in FCB treatment was lower than CON treatment (P < 0.05). The Fibrobacteres phylum belongs to cellulolytic bacteria was isolated, and their relative abundance in CB group showed no difference between CON and FCB treatments. The abundance of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group in CB treatment was higher than CON and FCB groups (P < 0.05), whereas the population of norank_f_Prevotellaceae was higher in FCB group compared to CON and CB groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary FCB decreased the abundance of bacterial communities, particularly the population of bacteria related to cellulolytic degradation.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; cellulolytic bacteria; corn bran; dietary fiber; fermentation; gut microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312900 PMCID: PMC5744180 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Composition of corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) (g/kg, DM basis).
| Starch | 243.2 | 131.3 |
| Organic matter | 971.7 | 978.4 |
| Crude protein | 164.8 | 115.1 |
| Cellulose | 120.1 | 93.1 |
| Hemicellulose | 332.7 | 262.2 |
| Lignin | 22.9 | 11.5 |
| Total dietary fiber | 601.3 | 694.4 |
| SDF | 66.7 | 102.6 |
| IDF | 534.7 | 591.8 |
| SDF/IDF | 12.5 | 17.3 |
| NSP | 535.5 | 689.7 |
| Rhamnose | 3.5 | 2.4 |
| Fructose | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| Ribose | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| Arabinose | 89.5 | 134.2 |
| Xylose | 148.0 | 206.0 |
| Mannose | 18.5 | 15.1 |
| Galactose | 24.5 | 23.3 |
| Glucose | 246.5 | 303.1 |
SDF, soluble dietary fiber; IDF, insoluble dietary fiber; NSP, non-starch polysaccharides.
Effects of dietary corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) on growth performance of finishing pigs.
| ADFI, kg | 2.44 ± 0.19 | 2.60 ± 0.13 | 2.51 ± 0.09 | 0.751 |
| ADG, g | 852 ± 64.7 | 897 ± 25.6 | 856 ± 27.0 | 0.726 |
| FCR | 2.88 ± 0.15 | 2.92 ± 0.14 | 2.99 ± 0.10 | 0.844 |
Twenty pigs per treatment (5 pens of 4 pigs) were measured for growth performance in a 21 d feeding trial. The results were presented as mean values ± SEMs. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test. CON, control group; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Effect of dietary corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) on nutrient digestibility of finishing pigs.
| GE | 88.58 ± 0.53 | 87.43 ± 0.42 | 87.68 ± 0.16 | 0.194 |
| DM | 89.46 ± 0.49 | 88.27 ± 0.37 | 88.50 ± 0.12 | 0.123 |
| OM | 90.91 ± 0.44a | 89.40 ± 0.40b | 89.70 ± 0.12b | 0.039 |
| CP | 86.73 ± 0.64 | 86.40 ± 0.51 | 87.85 ± 0.28 | 0.085 |
| EE | 64.05 ± 1.51 | 67.17 ± 1.32 | 65.94 ± 1.22 | 0.188 |
| TDF | 62.12 ± 1.43 | 63.87 ± 0.94 | 64.75 ± 1.38 | 0.203 |
Fecal samples from 1 pig per pen (n = 5 pigs per treatment) performed for nutrient digestibility in a 21 d feeding trial. The results were presented as mean values ± SEMs. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test. Different superscript lowercase letters within each row mean significantly different (P < 0.05). CON, control group; GE, gross energy; DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; TDF, total dietary fiber.
Figure 1Effect of dietary corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) on intestinal microbiota richness in finishing pigs. (A) OTU Venn of 3 dietary treatments. (B) The Chao 1 index of bacterial community. (C) Shannon index of bacterial community. Fecal samples from 7 pigs per treatment were performed for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis in a 21 d feeding trial. The results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis H test and presented as mean values of different bacteria, and asterisk means P < 0.05. CON, control group.
Figure 2Effect of dietary corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) on gut microbiota composition in finishing pigs. (A) Microbial community bar plot at the phylum level with the relative abundance higher than 0.05%. (B) Microbial community bar plot at the family level with the relative abundance higher than 1%. (C) Microbial community heat map of the top 30 bacteria at the genus level. Fecal samples from 7 pigs per treatment were performed for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis in a 21 d feeding trial. The results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis H test and presented as mean percentage of different bacteria. CON, control group.
Effect of dietary corn bran (CB) and fermented CB (FCB) on short-chain fatty acids concentrations in feces of finishing pigs.
| Acetate | 4.07 ± 0.17 | 4.26 ± 0.18 | 3.90 ± 0.10 | 0.289 |
| Propionate | 2.43 ± 0.17 | 2.60 ± 0.16 | 2.50 ± 0.09 | 0.682 |
| Isobutyrate | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.185 |
| Butyrate | 2.00 ± 0.22 | 1.68 ± 0.16 | 1.62 ± 0.09 | 0.259 |
| Isovalerate | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.352 |
| Valerate | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.388 |
| Total SCFAs | 9.05 ± 0.52 | 9.51 ± 0.48 | 8.84 ± 0.16 | 0.493 |
Fecal samples from at least 1 pig per pen (n = 7 pigs per treatment) were performed for SCFAs analysis in a 21 d feeding trial, data were presented as mean values ± SEMs. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test. CON, control group; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids.