Literature DB >> 25639600

The biomechanical efficacy of dressings in preventing heel ulcers.

Ayelet Levy1, Mor Ben-Or Frank1, Amit Gefen2.   

Abstract

The heels are the most common site for facility-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs), and are also the most susceptible location for deep tissue injuries. The use of multilayer prophylactic dressings to prevent heel PUs is a relatively new prevention concept, generally aimed at minimizing the risk for heel ulcers (HUs) through mechanical cushioning and reduction of friction at the dressing-support interface. We used 9 finite element model variants of the posterior heel in order to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a multilayer dressing in prevention of HUs during supine lying. We compared volumetric exposures of the loaded soft tissues to effective and maximal shear strains, as well as peak stresses in the Achilles tendon, without any dressing and with a single-layer or a multilayer dressing (Mepilex(®) Border Heel-type), on supports with different stiffnesses. The use of the multilayer dressing consistently and considerably reduced soft tissue exposures to elevated strains at the posterior heel, on all of the tested support surfaces and when loaded with either pure compression or combined compression and shear. The aforementioned multilayer design showed (i) clear benefit over a single-layer dressing in terms of dissipating tissue strains, by promoting internal shear in the dressing which diverts loads from tissues; (ii) a protective effect that was consistent on supports with different stiffnesses. Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the efficacy of the simulated multilayer dressing, and so, taken together with this modeling work, the use of a prophylactic multilayer dressing indicates a great promise in taking this route for prevention.
Copyright © 2015 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; Deep tissue injury; Finite element analysis; Heel pressure ulcers; Prophylactic dressings

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25639600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  22 in total

1.  Phantom testing of the sensitivity and precision of a sub-epidermal moisture scanner.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comment on 'Effectiveness of a multi-layer foam dressing in preventing sacral pressure ulcers for the early acute care of patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury: comparison with the use of a gel mattress'.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries.

Authors:  Danit Schwartz; Yana Katsman Magen; Ayelet Levy; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Soft silicone foam dressing is more effective than polyurethane film dressing for preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in spinal surgery patients: the Border Operating room Spinal Surgery (BOSS) trial in Japan.

Authors:  Mine Yoshimura; Norihiko Ohura; Junko Tanaka; Shoichi Ichimura; Yusuke Kasuya; Oruto Hotta; Yu Kagaya; Takuya Sekiyama; Mitsuko Tannba; Nao Suzuki
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  What makes a good head positioner for preventing occipital pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Rona Katzengold; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Sodium pyruvate pre-treatment prevents cell death due to localised, damaging mechanical strains in the context of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Martha B Alvarez-Elizondo; Tamar Barenholz-Cohen; Daphne Weihs
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Dafna Schwartz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Effects of Multilayer Silicone Foam Dressings for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Makoto Oe; Sanae Sasaki; Tomoko Shimura; Yoshie Takaki; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.