Literature DB >> 25638326

Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: patient-reported outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240).

Richard T Penson1, Helen Q Huang2, Lari B Wenzel3, Bradley J Monk4, Sharon Stockman5, Harry J Long6, Lois M Ramondetta7, Lisa M Landrum8, Ana Oaknin9, Thomas J A Reid10, Mario M Leitao11, Michael Method12, Helen Michael13, Krishnansu S Tewari3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GOG 240 was a practice-changing randomised phase 3 trial that concluded that chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer significantly improves overall and progression-free survival, and the proportion of patients achieving an overall objective response, compared with chemotherapy alone. In this study, we aimed to analyse patient-reported outcomes in GOG 240.
METHODS: Eligible adult participants (aged ≥18 years) had primary stage IVB or recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the cervix with measurable disease and GOG performance status of 0-1. Participants were randomly assigned by web-based permuted block randomisation (block size 4) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the four treatment groups: cisplatin (50 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 or 2 of the treatment cycle) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) intravenously over 24 h or 175 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 h on day 1), with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 or 2), or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on day 1) and topotecan (0·75 mg/m(2) for 30 min on days 1-3) with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1). Treatment assignment was concealed at randomisation (everyone was masked to treatment assignment, achieved by the use of a computer encrypted numbering system at the National Cancer Institute) and became open-label when each patient was registered to the trial. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The coprimary endpoints of the trial were overall survival and safety; the primary quality-of-life endpoint was the score on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Cx TOI). For our analysis of patient-reported outcomes, participants were assessed before treatment cycles 1, 2, and 5, and at 6 and 9 months after the start of cycle 1, with the FACT-Cx TOI, items from the FACT-GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale, and a worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inventory. All patients who completed baseline quality-of-life assessments and at least one further follow-up assessment were evaluable for quality-of-life outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062.
FINDINGS: Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, a total of 452 patients were enrolled in the trial, of whom 390 completed baseline quality-of-life assessment and at least one further assessment and were therefore evaluable for quality-of-life outcomes. In these patients, patient-reported outcome completion declined from 426 (94%) of 452 (at baseline) to 193 (63%) of 307 (9 months post-cycle 1), but completion rates did not differ significantly between treatment regimens (p=0·78). The baseline FACT-Cx TOI scores did not differ significantly between patients who received bevacizumab versus those who did not (p=0·27). Compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone, patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab reported FACT-Cx TOI scores that were an average of 1·2 points lower (98·75% CI -4·1 to 1·7; p=0·30).
INTERPRETATION: Improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival attributed to the incorporation of bevacizumab into the treatment of advanced cervical cancer were not accompanied by any significant deterioration in health-related quality of life. Patients responding to anti-angiogenesis therapy who maintain an acceptable quality of life could be suitable at progression for treatment with other novel therapies that might confer additional benefit. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25638326      PMCID: PMC4479218          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  25 in total

1.  Quality of life and survival in advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Dana M Chase; Helen Q Huang; Lari Wenzel; David Cella; Richard McQuellon; Harry J Long; David H Moore; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Validation and reduction of FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale for platinum/paclitaxel-induced neurologic symptoms: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  H Q Huang; M F Brady; D Cella; G Fleming
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency.

Authors:  Andrew Bottomley; Dave Jones; Lily Claassens
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Michael W Sill; Harry J Long; Richard T Penson; Helen Huang; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J Reid; Mario M Leitao; Helen E Michael; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Therapeutic potential of VEGF and VEGF-derived peptide in peripheral neuropathies.

Authors:  A Verheyen; E Peeraer; D Lambrechts; K Poesen; P Carmeliet; M Shibuya; I Pintelon; J-P Timmermans; R Nuydens; T Meert
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Fatigue is the most important symptom for advanced cancer patients who have had chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zeeshan Butt; Sarah K Rosenbloom; Amy P Abernethy; Jennifer L Beaumont; Diane Paul; Debra Hampton; Paul B Jacobsen; Karen L Syrjala; Jamie H Von Roenn; David Cella
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  David H Moore; Chunqiao Tian; Bradley J Monk; Harry J Long; George A Omura; Jeffrey D Bloss
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolyn C Gotay; Crissy T Kawamoto; Andrew Bottomley; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Factors associated with poor quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: implications for clinical care and clinical trials.

Authors:  Kathryn Osann; Susie Hsieh; Edward L Nelson; Bradley J Monk; Dana Chase; David Cella; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Michael W Sill; D Scott McMeekin; David E Cohn; Lois M Ramondetta; Cecelia H Boardman; Jo Benda; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  50 in total

1.  AACR Cancer Progress Report 2015.

Authors:  José Baselga; Nina Bhardwaj; Lewis C Cantley; Ronald DeMatteo; Raymond N DuBois; Margaret Foti; Susan M Gapstur; William C Hahn; Lee J Helman; Roy A Jensen; Electra D Paskett; Theodore S Lawrence; Stuart G Lutzker; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Pharmacologic management of advanced cervical cancer: antiangiogenesis therapy and immunotherapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Teresa C Longoria; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women's self-reported health-related quality of life.

Authors:  L M Wiltink; M King; F Müller; M S Sousa; M Tang; A Pendlebury; J Pittman; N Roberts; L Mileshkin; R Mercieca-Bebber; M-A Tait; R Campbell; C Rutherford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Antiangiogenics and immunotherapies in cervical cancer: an update and future's view.

Authors:  Daniela Luvero; Francesco Plotti; Salvatore Lopez; Giuseppe Scaletta; Stella Capriglione; Roberto Montera; Gianina Antonelli; Sara Ciuffreda; Raffaella Carassiti; Alice Oliveti; Roberto Angioli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Gynaecological cancer: Survival benefit and quality of life.

Authors:  Lisa Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Evidence-Based Treatment Paradigms for Management of Invasive Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Kovic; Xuejing Jin; Sean Alexander Kennedy; Mathieu Hylands; Michal Pedziwiatr; Akira Kuriyama; Huda Gomaa; Yung Lee; Morihiro Katsura; Masafumi Tada; Brian Y Hong; Sung Min Cho; Patrick Jiho Hong; Ashley M Yu; Yasmin Sivji; Augustin Toma; Li Xie; Ludwig Tsoi; Marcin Waligora; Manya Prasad; Neera Bhatnagar; Lehana Thabane; Michael Brundage; Gordon Guyatt; Feng Xie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240).

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Michael W Sill; Richard T Penson; Helen Huang; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J Reid; Mario M Leitao; Helen E Michael; Philip J DiSaia; Larry J Copeland; William T Creasman; Frederick B Stehman; Mark F Brady; Robert A Burger; J Tate Thigpen; Michael J Birrer; Steven E Waggoner; David H Moore; Katherine Y Look; Wui-Jin Koh; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Development of bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer: pharmacodynamic modeling, survival impact and toxicology.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Validation of PROMIS emotional distress short form scales for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Justin Wilford; Kathryn Osann; Susie Hsieh; Bradley Monk; Edward Nelson; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.