Krishnansu S Tewari1, Michael W Sill2, Richard T Penson3, Helen Huang2, Lois M Ramondetta4, Lisa M Landrum5, Ana Oaknin6, Thomas J Reid7, Mario M Leitao8, Helen E Michael9, Philip J DiSaia10, Larry J Copeland11, William T Creasman12, Frederick B Stehman9, Mark F Brady2, Robert A Burger13, J Tate Thigpen14, Michael J Birrer3, Steven E Waggoner15, David H Moore16, Katherine Y Look17, Wui-Jin Koh18, Bradley J Monk19. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: ktewari@uci.edu. 2. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 6. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. 7. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Women's Cancer Center at Kettering, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 8. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 9. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 10. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. 11. Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 13. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 14. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. 15. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 16. Franciscan St Francis Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 17. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 18. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 19. Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine at St Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: On Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1) or topotecan (0·75 mg/m2 on days 1-3) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on day 1) with or without intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1) in 21 day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, voluntary withdrawal by the patient, or complete response. We stratified randomisation by GOG performance status (0 vs 1), previous radiosensitising platinum-based chemotherapy, and disease status (recurrent or persistent vs metastatic). We gave treatment open label. Primary outcomes were OS (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and adverse events (analysed in all patients who received treatment and submitted adverse event information), assessed at the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The cutoff for final analysis was 450 patients with 346 deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062. FINDINGS:Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previouspelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death. INTERPRETATION: The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: On Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1) or topotecan (0·75 mg/m2 on days 1-3) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on day 1) with or without intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1) in 21 day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, voluntary withdrawal by the patient, or complete response. We stratified randomisation by GOG performance status (0 vs 1), previous radiosensitising platinum-based chemotherapy, and disease status (recurrent or persistent vs metastatic). We gave treatment open label. Primary outcomes were OS (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and adverse events (analysed in all patients who received treatment and submitted adverse event information), assessed at the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The cutoff for final analysis was 450 patients with 346 deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062. FINDINGS: Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previous pelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death. INTERPRETATION: The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Lindsey E Minion; Jiaru Bai; Bradley J Monk; L Robin Keller; Eskander N Ramez; Gareth K Forde; John K Chan; Krishnansu S Tewari Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Richard T Penson; Helen Q Huang; Lari B Wenzel; Bradley J Monk; Sharon Stockman; Harry J Long; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J A Reid; Mario M Leitao; Michael Method; Helen Michael; Krishnansu S Tewari Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: David H Moore; Chunqiao Tian; Bradley J Monk; Harry J Long; George A Omura; Jeffrey D Bloss Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Krishnansu S Tewari; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Richard T Penson; Harry J Long; Andrés Poveda; Lisa M Landrum; Mario M Leitao; Jubilee Brown; Thomas J A Reid; Helen E Michael; David H Moore Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sanja Stevanović; Sarah R Helman; John R Wunderlich; Michelle M Langhan; Stacey L Doran; Mei Li M Kwong; Robert P T Somerville; Christopher A Klebanoff; Udai S Kammula; Richard M Sherry; James C Yang; Steven A Rosenberg; Christian S Hinrichs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Warner K Huh; William E Brady; Paula M Fracasso; Don S Dizon; Matthew A Powell; Bradley J Monk; Charles A Leath; Lisa M Landrum; Edward J Tanner; Erin K Crane; Stefanie Ueda; Michael T McHale; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: John J Wallbillich; Paul Mh Tran; Shan Bai; Lynn Kh Tran; Ashok K Sharma; Sharad A Ghamande; Jin-Xiong She Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: A de Juan; A Redondo; M J Rubio; Y García; J Cueva; L Gaba; A Yubero; J Alarcón; C Maximiano; A Oaknin Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Ramachandran Rashmi; Kay Jayachandran; Jin Zhang; Vishnu Menon; Naoshad Muhammad; Michael Zahner; Fiona Ruiz; Sisi Zhang; Kevin Cho; Yuting Wang; Xiaojing Huang; Yi Huang; Michael L McCormick; Buck E Rogers; Douglas R Spitz; Gary J Patti; Julie K Schwarz Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 6.261