Tissiana Bortolotto1, Jose Bahillo2, Olivier Richoz3, Farhad Hafezi3, Ivo Krejci4. 1. Division of Cariology and Endodontics, University Clinic of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Barthelemy Menn 19, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland. Tissiana.Bortolotto@unige.ch. 2. Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, International University of Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Valles, 08195, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Department of Ophtalmology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Alcide-Jentzer 22, CH-1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. 4. Division of Cariology and Endodontics, University Clinic of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Barthelemy Menn 19, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the failure mode of adhesive interfaces by comparing OCT and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of class V restoration margins located on enamel and dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups were tested that differed in the application of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (OptiBond FL) prior to cavity filling with restorative composite resin (Clearfil AP-X). After tooth restoration and polishing, the samples were loaded in a fatigue machine, and adhesive interfaces were evaluated with OCT and SEM. RESULTS: Important and complementary information could be obtained with OCT analysis in respect to how marginal defects can propagate inside the cavity, compromising the restoration's long-term performance. A self-etching effect was observed with OptiBond FL due to the presence of an acidic primer (GPDM) within its composition. Our results could show that areas of bonding and gaps coexisted within the same restoration. CONCLUSIONS: When marginal imperfections, or non-continuous margins, were detected by SEM, also imperfections beneath the surface could be observed at the tooth-restoration interface with OCT. Restoration loss occurred above the borderline of 50% of marginal gaps on enamel and dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Marginal discrepancies of adhesive restorations can propagate inside the cavity and lead to restoration loss.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the failure mode of adhesive interfaces by comparing OCT and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of class V restoration margins located on enamel and dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups were tested that differed in the application of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (OptiBond FL) prior to cavity filling with restorative composite resin (Clearfil AP-X). After tooth restoration and polishing, the samples were loaded in a fatigue machine, and adhesive interfaces were evaluated with OCT and SEM. RESULTS: Important and complementary information could be obtained with OCT analysis in respect to how marginal defects can propagate inside the cavity, compromising the restoration's long-term performance. A self-etching effect was observed with OptiBond FL due to the presence of an acidic primer (GPDM) within its composition. Our results could show that areas of bonding and gaps coexisted within the same restoration. CONCLUSIONS: When marginal imperfections, or non-continuous margins, were detected by SEM, also imperfections beneath the surface could be observed at the tooth-restoration interface with OCT. Restoration loss occurred above the borderline of 50% of marginal gaps on enamel and dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Marginal discrepancies of adhesive restorations can propagate inside the cavity and lead to restoration loss.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bond degradation; Optical coherence tomography; Quantitative margin analysis; Scanning electron microscope
Authors: Cynthia Soares de Azevedo; Luciana Cardoso Espejo Trung; Maria Regina Lorenzetti Simionato; Anderson Zanardi de Freitas; Adriana Bona Matos Journal: Braz Oral Res Date: 2011 Sep-Oct
Authors: Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Johan Snauwaert; Jan De Munck; Marleen Peumans; Yasuhiro Yoshida; André Poitevin; Eduardo Coutinho; Kazuomi Suzuki; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Paulette Spencer; Qiang Ye; Jonggu Park; Elizabeth M Topp; Anil Misra; Orestes Marangos; Yong Wang; Brenda S Bohaty; Viraj Singh; Fabio Sene; John Eslick; Kyle Camarda; J Lawrence Katz Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2010-02-27 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Sinan Şen; Ralf Erber; Kevin Kunzmann; Stefanie Kirschner; Vanessa Weyer; Lothar Schilling; Marc A Brockmann; Stefan Rues; Gül Orhan; Christopher J Lux; Sebastian Zingler Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Monika Machoy; Julia Seeliger; Liliana Szyszka-Sommerfeld; Robert Koprowski; Tomasz Gedrange; Krzysztof Woźniak Journal: J Healthc Eng Date: 2017-07-16 Impact factor: 2.682