Literature DB >> 15680997

Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.

David C Sarrett1.   

Abstract

Posterior composite restorations have been in use for approximately 30 years. The early experiences with this treatment indicated there were more clinical challenges and higher failure rates than amalgam restorations. Since the early days of posterior composites, many improvements in materials, techniques, and instruments for placing these restorations have occurred. This paper reviews what is known regarding current clinical challenges with posterior composite restorations and reviews the primary method for collecting clinical performance data. This review categorizes the challenges as those related to the restorative materials, those related to the dentist, and those related to the patient. The clinical relevance of laboratory tests is discussed from the perspective of solving the remaining clinical challenges of current materials and of screening new materials. The clinical problems related to early composite materials are no longer serious clinical challenges. Clinical data indicate that secondary caries and restoration fracture are the most common clinical problems and merit further investigation. The effect of the dentist and patient on performance of posterior composite restorations is unclear and more clinical data from hypothesis-driven clinical trials are needed to understand these factors. Improvements in handling properties to ensure void-free placement and complete cure should be investigated to improve clinical outcomes. There is a general lack of data that correlates clinical performance with laboratory materials testing. A proposed list of materials tests that may predict performance in a variety of clinical factors is presented. Polymerization shrinkage and the problems that have been attributed to this property of composite are reviewed. There is a lack of evidence that indicates polymerization shrinkage is the primary cause of secondary caries. It is recommended that composite materials be developed with antibacterial properties as a way of reducing failures due to secondary caries. Post-operative sensitivity appears to be more related to the dentin adhesives' ability to seal open dentinal tubules rather than the effects of polymerization shrinkage on cuspal deflections and marginal adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15680997     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  84 in total

1.  BisGMA/TEGDMA dental composite containing high aspect-ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Qingsong Yu; Yong Wang; Hao Li
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Nanocomposite containing amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles for caries inhibition.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Jennifer L Moreau; Limin Sun; Laurence C Chow
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Adam Rencz; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Modulated photoactivation of composite restoration: measurement of cuspal movement using holographic interferometry.

Authors:  Larisa Blažić; Dejan Pantelić; Svetlana Savić-Šević; Branka Murić; Ilija Belić; Bratimir Panić
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Antibacterial amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomposites with a quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate and silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu; Joseph M Antonucci; Alison M Kraigsley; Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 6.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  R Hickel; J-F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.

Authors:  T Bortolotto; I Onisor; I Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Antibacterial and physical properties of calcium-phosphate and calcium-fluoride nanocomposites with chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu; Alison M Kraigsley; Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Evaluation of antibacterial and remineralizing nanocomposite and adhesive in rat tooth cavity model.

Authors:  Fang Li; Ping Wang; Michael D Weir; Ashraf F Fouad; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations.

Authors:  Anqi Zhang; Ruoqiong Chen; Wondwosen Aregawi; Yiting He; Shuting Wang; Conrado Aparicio; Joel Rudney; Hooi Pin Chew; Alex S Fok
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.