Literature DB >> 8423246

Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites.

I Krejci1, M Kuster, F Lutz.   

Abstract

The influence of dentinal fluid and of a number of stress procedures on the quality of the margins of class V restorations located in both enamel and dentin was quantitatively assessed in vitro with the aid of a scanning electron microscope. The materials tested were GLUMA 2000 experimental, Prisma Universal Bond 3, and Syntac, together with the fine hybrid composites supplied by the respective manufacturers (Pekafill, AP.H, and Tetric). All materials achieved over 95% of "continuous margin" in enamel before and after stressing. In dentin, the initial values, with as well as without dentinal fluid simulation, were situated between 93.2 and 98.2%. With GLUMA 2000 experimental after stressing, a "continuous margin" occurred in only 50.2%, but with Prisma Universal Bond 3 and Syntac, the value was 79.0%. The influence of dentinal fluid simulation was dependent on the dentinal adhesive used. The effects of the various stress procedures were not significantly different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423246     DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720020401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  9 in total

1.  The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.

Authors:  Tissiana Bortolotto; Wassila Doudou; Karl Heinz Kunzelmann; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.

Authors:  T Bortolotto; I Onisor; I Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities.

Authors:  Juan R Mayoral; Ladislav Gregor; Edson A Campos; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Failure analysis of adhesive restorations with SEM and OCT: from marginal gaps to restoration loss.

Authors:  Tissiana Bortolotto; Jose Bahillo; Olivier Richoz; Farhad Hafezi; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Self-etching aspects of a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jose Bahillo; Miguel Roig; Tissiana Bortolotto; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities.

Authors:  M Zaruba; R Kasper; R Kazama; F J Wegehaupt; A Ender; T Attin; A Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Bulk filling of Class II cavities with a dual-cure composite: Effect of curing mode and enamel etching on marginal adaptation.

Authors:  Jose Bahillo; Tissiana Bortolotto; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Exposed Dentin: Influence of Cleaning Procedures and Simulated Pulpal Pressure on Bond Strength of a Universal Adhesive System.

Authors:  Simon Flury; Anne Peutzfeldt; Patrick R Schmidlin; Adrian Lussi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of the Validity of Digital Optical Microscopy in the Assessment of Marginal Adaptation of Dental Adhesive Interfaces.

Authors:  René Daher; Ivo Krejci; Enrico di Bella; Laurine Marger
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.329

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.