Literature DB >> 25637457

Preclinical Medical Student Hematology/Oncology Education Environment.

Marc S Zumberg1, Virginia C Broudy2, Elizabeth M Bengtson3, Scott D Gitlin4.   

Abstract

To better prepare medical students to care for patients in today's changing health-care environment as they transition to continuing their education as residents, many US medical schools have been reviewing and modifying their curricula and are considering integration of newer adult learning techniques, including team-based learning, flipped classrooms, and other active learning approaches (Assoc Am Med Coll. 2014). Directors of hematology/oncology (H/O) courses requested an assessment of today's H/O education environment to help them respond to the ongoing changes in the education content and environment that will be necessary to meet this goal. Several recommendations for the improvement of cancer education resulted from American Association for Cancer Education's (ACCE's) "Cancer Education Survey II" including a call for medical schools to evaluate the effectiveness of current teaching methods in achieving cancer education objectives (Chamberlain et al. J Cancer Educ 7(2):105-114.2014). To understand the current environment and resources used in medical student preclinical H/O courses, an Internet-based, Survey Monkey®-formatted, questionnaire focusing on nine topic areas was distributed to 130 United States Hematology/Oncology Course Directors (HOCDs). HOCDs represent a diverse group of individuals who work in variably supportive environments and who are variably satisfied with their position. Several aspects of these courses remain relatively unchanged from previous assessments, including a predominance of traditional lectures, small group sessions, and examinations that are either written or computer-based. Newer technology, including web-based reproduction of lectures, virtual microscopes, and availability of additional web-based content has been introduced into these courses. A variety of learner evaluation and course assessment approaches are used. The ultimate effectiveness and impact of these changes needs to be determined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compensation; Curriculum; Education; Medical student; Technology; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637457     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0778-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  15 in total

1.  Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education.

Authors:  D O Nutter; J S Bond; B S Coller; R M D'Alessandri; B L Gewertz; L M Nora; J P Perkins; T S Shomaker; R T Watson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum.

Authors:  C Enarson; L Cariaga-Lo
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  The perils of paying academic physicians according to the clinical revenue they generate.

Authors:  Richard B Gunderman
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Recognizing clinical faculty's contributions in education.

Authors:  Nancy Schindler; David P Winchester; Heather Sherman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say?

Authors:  Susan E Skochelak
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Teaching hematology to second year medical students: results of a national survey of hematology course directors.

Authors:  Virginia C Broudy; Scot Hickman
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Virtual microscopy in pathology education.

Authors:  Fred R Dee
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  A web-based teaching program for laboratory diagnosis of coagulation disorders.

Authors:  A N Nguyen; M O Uthman; K A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Instructional methods and the use of teaching resources in cancer education curricula. Cancer Education Survey II: cancer education in United States medical schools.

Authors:  R E Gallagher; R F Bakemeier; R M Chamberlain; C E Kupchella; J F O'Donnell; J A Parker; G J Hill; C M Brooks
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools. Cancer Education Survey II: cancer education in United States medical schools.

Authors:  R M Chamberlain; R F Bakemeier; R E Gallagher; C E Kupchella; J F O'Donnell; J A Parker; G J Hill; C M Brooks
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.037

View more
  3 in total

1.  Determinants of hematology-oncology trainees' postfellowship career pathways with a focus on nonmalignant hematology.

Authors:  Ariela L Marshall; Sarah Jenkins; Joseph Mikhael; Scott D Gitlin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-02-27

2.  Understanding the Mentoring Environment Through Thematic Analysis of the Learning Environment in Medical Education: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jia Min Hee; Hong Wei Yap; Zheng Xuan Ong; Simone Qian Min Quek; Ying Pin Toh; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  What Medical Oncologist Residents Think about the Italian Speciality Schools: A Survey of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) on Educational, Clinical and Research Activities.

Authors:  Anna Moretti; Michele Ghidini; Carmine De Angelis; Matteo Lambertini; Chiara Cremolini; Martina Imbimbo; Rossana Berardi; Massimo Di Maio; Stefano Cascinu; Nicla La Verde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.