Literature DB >> 10693859

Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education.

D O Nutter1, J S Bond, B S Coller, R M D'Alessandri, B L Gewertz, L M Nora, J P Perkins, T S Shomaker, R T Watson.   

Abstract

A national panel on medical education was appointed as a component of the AAMC's Mission-based Management Program and charged with developing a metrics system for measuring medical school faculty effort and contributions to a school's education mission. The panel first defined important variables to be considered in creating such a system: the education programs in which medical school faculty participate; the categories of education work that may be performed in each program (teaching, development of education products, administration and service, and scholarship in education); and the array of specific education activities that faculty could perform in each of these work areas. The panel based the system on a relative value scale, since this approach does not equate faculty performance solely to the time expended by a faculty member in pursuit of a specific activity. Also, a four-step process to create relative value units (RVUs) for education activities was developed. This process incorporates quantitative and qualitative measures of faculty activity and also can measure and value the distribution of faculty effort relative to a school's education mission. When adapted to the education mission and culture of an individual school, the proposed metrics system can provide critical information that will assist the school's leadership in evaluating and rewarding faculty performance in education and will support a mission-based management strategy in the school.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693859     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

Review 1.  The computer-based lecture.

Authors:  M M Wofford; A W Spickard; J L Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Fostering professionalism in medical education: a call for improved assessment and meaningful incentives.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Virginia A Reed; G Christian Jernstedt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends.

Authors:  David M Irby; LuAnn Wilkerson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A Metric-Based System for Evaluating the Productivity of Preclinical Faculty at an Academic Medical Center in the Era of Clinical and Translational Science.

Authors:  Susan E Wiegers; Steven R Houser; Helen E Pearson; Ann Untalan; Joseph Y Cheung; Susan G Fisher; Larry R Kaiser; Arthur M Feldman
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Preclinical Medical Student Hematology/Oncology Education Environment.

Authors:  Marc S Zumberg; Virginia C Broudy; Elizabeth M Bengtson; Scott D Gitlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Capturing Psychologists' Work in Academic Health Settings: The Role of the Educational Value Unit (EVU).

Authors:  Eugene J D'Angelo; Katie Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2016-03

7.  Financial implications of increasing medical school class size: does tuition cover cost?

Authors:  Danny A Schieffler; Benjamin M Azevedo; Richard A Culbertson; Marc J Kahn
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012

8.  Challenges of measuring a faculty member activity in medical schools.

Authors:  A Mohammadi; R Mojtahedzadeh; S H Emami Razavi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  Contextual adaptation of the Personnel Evaluation Standards for assessing faculty evaluation systems in developing countries: the case of Iran.

Authors:  Soleiman Ahmady; Tahereh Changiz; Mats Brommels; F Andrew Gaffney; Johan Thor; Italo Masiello
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Experiences of Academic Members About their Professional Challenges: a Content Analysis Qualitative study.

Authors:  Zohreh Shahhosseini; Mahmonier Danesh
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.