Literature DB >> 11703641

Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum.

C Enarson1, L Cariaga-Lo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The results of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 examinations are reported for students enrolled in a problem-based and traditional lecture-based curricula over a seven-year period at a single institution. There were no statistically significant differences in mean scores on either examination over the seven year period as a whole. There were statistically significant main effects noted by cohort year and curricular track for both the Step 1 and 2 examinations. These results support the general, long-term effectiveness of problem-based learning with respect to basic and clinical science knowledge acquisition. CONTEXT: This paper reports the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 results for students enrolled in a problem-based and traditional lecture-based learning curricula over the seven-year period (1992-98) in order to evaluate the adequacy of each curriculum in supporting students learning of the basic and clinical sciences.
METHODS: Six hundred and eighty-nine students who took the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 540 students who took Step 2 for the first time over the seven-year period were included in the analyses. T-test analyses were utilized to compare students' Step 1 and Step 2 performance by curriculum groups.
RESULTS: United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores over the seven-year period were 214 for Traditional Curriculum students and 208 for Parallel Curriculum students (t-value = 1.32, P=0.21). Mean Step 2 scores over the seven-year period were 208 for Traditional Curriculum students and 206 for Parallel Curriculum students (t-value=1.08, P=0.30). Statistically significant main effects were noted by cohort year and curricular track for both the Step 1 and Step 2 examinations.
CONCLUSION: The totality of experience in both groups, although differing by curricular type, may be similar enough that the comparable scores are what should be expected. These results should be reassuring to curricular planners and faculty that problem-based learning can provide students with the knowledge needed for the subsequent phases of their medical education.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11703641     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01058.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  13 in total

1.  Research in medical education: three decades of progress.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

2.  Preclinical Medical Student Hematology/Oncology Education Environment.

Authors:  Marc S Zumberg; Virginia C Broudy; Elizabeth M Bengtson; Scott D Gitlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The effectiveness of the problem-based learning teaching model for use in introductory Chinese undergraduate medical courses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanqi Zhang; Liang Zhou; Xiaoyu Liu; Ling Liu; Yazhou Wu; Zengwei Zhao; Dali Yi; Dong Yi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Medical students' achievement on the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery/Chirurgery Final Part I and II licensing examination: a comparison of students in problem-based learning, community-based education and service, and conventional curricula in Ghana.

Authors:  Victor Mogre; Anthony Amalba; Mark Saaka; Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-05-08

5.  Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning in physical diagnostics education in China: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianmiao Wang; Yongjian Xu; Xiansheng Liu; Weining Xiong; Jungang Xie; Jianping Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of medical students' learning approaches between electronic and hard copy team-based learning.

Authors:  Fawzy Sharaf; Sultan Alnohair
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Effect of Concept Mapping Education on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Aslami Maryam; Dehghani Mohammadreza; Shakurnia Abdolhussein; Ramezani Ghobad; Kojuri Javad
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2021-03

8.  Medical Students' Reflections on the Recent Changes to the USMLE Step Exams.

Authors:  Peter T Cangialosi; Brian C Chung; Torin P Thielhelm; Nicholas D Camarda; Dylan S Eiger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

9.  Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study.

Authors:  Lian-Hong Yang; Long-Yuan Jiang; Bing Xu; Shu-Qiong Liu; Yan-Ran Liang; Jin-Hao Ye; En-Xiang Tao
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Modified task-based learning program promotes problem-solving capacity among Chinese medical postgraduates: a mixed quantitative survey.

Authors:  Yanping Tian; Chengren Li; Jiali Wang; Qiyan Cai; Hanzhi Wang; Xingshu Chen; Yunlai Liu; Feng Mei; Lan Xiao; Rui Jian; Hongli Li
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.