Literature DB >> 25636855

The accuracy of the Oculus Rift virtual reality head-mounted display during cervical spine mobility measurement.

Xu Xu1, Karen B Chen2, Jia-Hua Lin3, Robert G Radwin4.   

Abstract

An inertial sensor-embedded virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display, the Oculus Rift (the Rift), monitors head movement so the content displayed can be updated accordingly. While the Rift may have potential use in cervical spine biomechanics studies, its accuracy in terms of cervical spine mobility measurement has not yet been validated. In the current study, a VR environment was designed to guide participants to perform prescribed neck movements. The cervical spine kinematics was measured by both the Rift and a reference motion tracking system. Comparison of the kinematics data between the Rift and the tracking system indicated that the Rift can provide good estimates on full range of motion (from one side to the other side) during the performed task. Because of inertial sensor drifting, the unilateral range of motion (from one side to neutral posture) derived from the Rift is more erroneous. The root-mean-square errors over a 1-min task were within 10° for each rotation axis. The error analysis further indicated that the inertial sensor drifted approximately 6° at the beginning of a trial during the initialization. This needs to be addressed when using the Rift in order to more accurately measure cervical spine kinematics. It is suggested that the front cover of the Rift should be aligned against a vertical plane during its initialization.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inertial sensors; Motion analysis; Neck range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25636855     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  HTC Vive MeVisLab integration via OpenVR for medical applications.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Markus Gall; Jürgen Wallner; Pedro Boechat; Alexander Hann; Xing Li; Xiaojun Chen; Dieter Schmalstieg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A virtual reality intervention for fear of movement for Veterans with chronic pain: protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  Christopher A Fowler; Lisa M Ballistrea; Kerry E Mazzone; Aaron M Martin; Howard Kaplan; Kevin E Kip; Jennifer L Murphy; Sandra L Winkler
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-12-11

3.  Comparative Analysis of Kinect-Based and Oculus-Based Gaze Region Estimation Methods in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  David González-Ortega; Francisco Javier Díaz-Pernas; Mario Martínez-Zarzuela; Míriam Antón-Rodríguez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Feasibility and safety of an immersive virtual reality-based vestibular rehabilitation programme in people with multiple sclerosis experiencing vestibular impairment: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cristina García-Muñoz; María Jesús Casuso-Holgado; Juan Carlos Hernández-Rodríguez; Elena Pinero-Pinto; Rocío Palomo-Carrión; María-Dolores Cortés-Vega
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Investigating the Use of Virtual Reality Headsets for Postural Control Assessment: Instrument Validation Study.

Authors:  Brian Sylcott; Chia-Cheng Lin; Keith Williams; Mark Hinderaker
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  A novel virtual reality application for autonomous assessment of cervical range of motion: development and reliability study.

Authors:  Jose Angel Santos-Paz; Álvaro Sánchez-Picot; Ana Rojo; Aitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti; Abraham Otero; Rodrigo Garcia-Carmona
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 7.  XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Hirohito Hirata; Koji Otani; Maki Sugimoto; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Masaya Ueno; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.