INTRODUCTION: Intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications (ICAC), a frequent finding on imaging studies, are predictive of future stroke risk in population-based studies. The clinical significance of this observation among ischemic stroke patients is however less clear. In this study, we analyzed ICAC burden in relation to vascular risk factor profile, stroke etiology, and extent of craniocervical vascular calcifications in a consecutive series of ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: The burden of ICAC was determined both on non-contrast CT and CT-angiography source images by semiquantitative scoring algorithms. The distribution of vascular risk factors, etiologic stroke subtype, and calcification burden in other craniocervical arteries was assessed among patients with no ICAC, mild-moderate ICAC, and severe ICAC. RESULTS: Of 319 patients included into the study, 28 % had no ICAC, 35 % had mild-moderate ICAC, and 37 % had severe ICAC on CT angiography. Independent factors associated with ICAC burden in multivariate analysis included age (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.006), and coronary artery disease (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a stroke etiology of large artery atherosclerosis or cardioaortic embolism was significantly related to higher ICAC burden (p = 0.006). Patients with severe ICAC were more likely to harbor calcifications in other vascular beds (p < 0.001). All of these findings persisted when analyses were repeated with CT-based ICAC burden assessments. CONCLUSION: ICAC burden reflects a continuum of atherosclerotic disease involving carotid arteries together with other craniocervical vascular beds. ICAC is significantly associated with stroke of large vessel or cardioembolic origin. This information might help the clinician in prioritizing etiologic work-up in the acute period.
INTRODUCTION:Intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications (ICAC), a frequent finding on imaging studies, are predictive of future stroke risk in population-based studies. The clinical significance of this observation among ischemic strokepatients is however less clear. In this study, we analyzed ICAC burden in relation to vascular risk factor profile, stroke etiology, and extent of craniocervical vascular calcifications in a consecutive series of ischemic strokepatients. METHODS: The burden of ICAC was determined both on non-contrast CT and CT-angiography source images by semiquantitative scoring algorithms. The distribution of vascular risk factors, etiologic stroke subtype, and calcification burden in other craniocervical arteries was assessed among patients with no ICAC, mild-moderate ICAC, and severe ICAC. RESULTS: Of 319 patients included into the study, 28 % had no ICAC, 35 % had mild-moderate ICAC, and 37 % had severe ICAC on CT angiography. Independent factors associated with ICAC burden in multivariate analysis included age (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.006), and coronary artery disease (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a stroke etiology of large artery atherosclerosis or cardioaortic embolism was significantly related to higher ICAC burden (p = 0.006). Patients with severe ICAC were more likely to harbor calcifications in other vascular beds (p < 0.001). All of these findings persisted when analyses were repeated with CT-based ICAC burden assessments. CONCLUSION:ICAC burden reflects a continuum of atherosclerotic disease involving carotid arteries together with other craniocervical vascular beds. ICAC is significantly associated with stroke of large vessel or cardioembolic origin. This information might help the clinician in prioritizing etiologic work-up in the acute period.
Authors: Anouk C van Dijk; Susanne Fonville; Taihra Zadi; Antonius M G van Hattem; Ghesrouw Saiedie; Peter J Koudstaal; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Arlette E Odink; Aad van der Lugt; Albert Hofman; Myriam G M Hunink; Monique M B Breteler; Gabriel P Krestin; Jacqueline C M Witteman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2006-08-21 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Daniel Bos; M Arfan Ikram; Suzette E Elias-Smale; Gabriel P Krestin; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Aad van der Lugt; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Nu Rhee Hong; Hyung Suk Seo; Young Hen Lee; Jung Hyuk Kim; Hae Young Seol; Nam Joon Lee; Sang-Il Suh Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: T T de Weert; H Cakir; S Rozie; S Cretier; E Meijering; D W J Dippel; A van der Lugt Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Frederik F Strobl; Beatrice Kuhlin; Robert Stahl; Bastian O Sabel; Andreas D Helck; Andreas Schindler; Matthias Witt; Fabian Bamberg; Maximilian F Reiser; Tobias Saam Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Remko Kockelkoren; Annelotte Vos; Wim Van Hecke; Aryan Vink; Ronald L A W Bleys; Daphne Verdoorn; Willem P Th M Mali; Jeroen Hendrikse; Huiberdina L Koek; Pim A de Jong; Jill B De Vis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michaël T J Peeters; Rik Houben; Alida A Postma; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Leon J Schurgers; Julie Staals Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Heng Du; Jia Li; Wenjie Yang; Daniel Bos; Lu Zheng; Lawrence Ka Sing Wong; Thomas W Leung; Xiangyan Chen Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Wen-Jie Yang; Bruce A Wasserman; Lu Zheng; Zhong-Qing Huang; Jia Li; Jill Abrigo; Simon Sin-Man Wong; Michael Tin-Cheung Ying; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Lawrence Ka-Sing Wong; Thomas Wai-Hong Leung; Xiang-Yan Chen Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.003