Literature DB >> 2057968

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress.

.   

Abstract

Fifty North American centers have combined to evaluate the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in randomized patients who have experienced symptoms related to arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery and who have received either best medical therapy alone or best medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy. The outcome events are nonfatal and fatal stroke or death. A three-tier system identifies and adjudicates the type, severity, and location of each stroke and the cause of any death. Data about patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy outside the trial are compiled at the Nonrandomized Data Center at the Mayo Clinic. Between December 27, 1987, and October 1, 1990, 1,212 patients were randomized, 596 to medical therapy, 616 to carotid endarterectomy. Cross-over from the medical to the surgical arm has been low (4.2%). Patients eligible for the trial, but not randomized totaled 1,044; their characteristics were similar to those randomized so that, for the type of symptomatic patient in this study, our conclusions about the benefit of carotid endarterectomy can be generalized. Patients excluded by medical criteria totaled 679. Another 1,591 had carotid endarterectomy, but either lacked the disease under study, were asymptomatic, or received inadequate investigation to meet entry criteria. We set sample size at 1,900 patients, with continuing enrollment. The Monitoring Committee reviews at intervals the confidential analyses performed on the groups with moderate (30-69%) and severe (70-99%) stenosis. Stopping rules will be invoked for one or both groups if unequivocal benefit or harm is identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2057968     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.22.6.711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  184 in total

1.  Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography.

Authors:  M Koga; K Kimura; K Minematsu; T Yamaguchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Patrick J H de Koning; Elena Zudilova-Seinstra; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stafira; Jagadeesh R Sonnad; William T C Yuh; David R Huard; Robin E Acker; Dan L Nguyen; Joan E Maley; Faridali G Ramji; Wen-Bin Li; Christopher M Loftus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  [Treatment of arteriosclerotic carotid stenosis: an overview].

Authors:  T Struffert; I Grunwald; C Roth; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  [Significance of Doppler ultrasound procedures for diagnosis of carotid stenoses].

Authors:  R Kubale; C Arning
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Calcium at the carotid siphon as an indicator of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Nikola Gotovac; Ivana Išgum; Max A Viergever; Geert J Biessels; Josip Fajdić; Birgitta K Velthuis; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Attenuation Coefficient Parameter Computations for Tissue Composition Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque in Vivo.

Authors:  Catherine N Steffel; Shahriar Salamat; Thomas D Cook; Stephanie M Wilbrand; Robert J Dempsey; Carol C Mitchell; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Turbulence and circulating cerebral emboli detectable at Doppler ultrasonography: a differentiation study in a stenotic middle cerebral artery model.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Donald G Grosset; Qiu Li; Ashfaq Shuaib; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.