| Literature DB >> 25633329 |
Eliza de Lucas Chazin1, Paola de Souza Sanches2, Eric Brazil Lindgren3, Walcimar Trindade Vellasco Júnior4, Laine Celestino Pinto5, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano6, Julliane Diniz Yoneda7, Kátia Zaccur Leal8, Claudia Regina Brandão Gomes9, James Lewis Wardell10, Solange Maria Silva Veloso Wardell11, Raquel Carvalho Montenegro12, Thatyana Rocha Alves Vasconcelos13.
Abstract
With the aim of discovering new anticancer agents, we have designed and synthesized novel 6-hydroxy-benzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one Schiff bases. The synthesis started with the selective nitration at 5-position of 6-hydroxybenzo[d][1,3]oxathiol-2-one (1) leading to the nitro derivative 2. The nitro group of 2 was reduced to give the amino intermediate 3. Schiff bases 4a-r were obtained from coupling reactions between 3 and various benzaldehydes and heteroaromatic aldehydes. All the new compounds were fully identified and characterized by NMR (1H and 13C) and specifically for 4q by X-ray crystallography. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the compounds was evaluated against cancer cell lines (ACP-03, SKMEL-19 and HCT-116) by using MTT assay. Schiff bases 4b and 4o exhibited promising cytotoxicity against ACP-03 and SKMEL-19, respectively, with IC50 values lower than 5 μM. This class of compounds can be considered as a good starting point for the development of new lead molecules in the fight against cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25633329 PMCID: PMC6272564 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20021968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives.
Cytotoxic activity of 1,3-benzoxathiol-2-one derivatives for cancer cell lines a.
| Compound | MTT | Hemolysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACP-03 | SKMEL-19 | HCT-116 | ||
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| 4.8 (3.2–7.2) | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | 9.4 (7.3–12.1) | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | 5.6 (4.7–6.4) | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | 2.8 (2.0–3.8) | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| >10 | >10 | >10 | >200 | |
| 0.274 (0.22–0.33) | 0.045 (0.01–0.15) | 0.1 (0.05–0.28) | >200 | |
Notes: a Data are presented as IC50 values and 95% of confidence interval for gastric (ACP-03), melanoma (SKMEL-19) and colon (HCT-116) cancer cells. Doxorubicin (Dox) was used as positive control. Experiments were performed in triplicate; b EC50 = effective concentration.
Figure 1Atom arrangements and numbering scheme for 4q.
Figure 2(a) E isomer, the lowest energy conformer and the only isomer observed experimentally; (b) Z isomer (ΔG = +4.83 kcal/mol).
Lipinski’s rule of five for compounds 2, 3 and 4a–r.
| MW (Da) | PSA (A2) | HBA | HBD | ClogP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 213.169 | 74.763 | 6 | 1 | 2.05 |
|
| 183.187 | 64.793 | 4 | 2 | 1.21 |
|
| 296.31 | 60.46 | 5 | 1 | 3.91 |
|
| 316.29 | 83.96 | 7 | 1 | 3.91 |
|
| 316.29 | 83.92 | 7 | 1 | 3.91 |
|
| 350.19 | 47.81 | 4 | 1 | 4.71 |
|
| 350.19 | 45.05 | 4 | 1 | 4.71 |
|
| 305.74 | 45.09 | 4 | 1 | 4.44 |
|
| 340.19 | 43.30 | 4 | 1 | 5.00 |
|
| 271.30 | 45.12 | 4 | 1 | 3.88 |
|
| 314.37 | 45.92 | 5 | 1 | 4.16 |
|
| 301.32 | 52.09 | 5 | 1 | 3.75 |
|
| 287.30 | 60.01 | 5 | 2 | 3.49 |
|
| 303.29 | 77.42 | 6 | 3 | 3.10 |
|
| 303.29 | 78.77 | 6 | 3 | 3.10 |
|
| 303.29 | 79.36 | 6 | 3 | 3.10 |
|
| 332.29 | 98.31 | 8 | 2 | 3.52 |
|
| 366.19 | 61.31 | 5 | 2 | 4.32 |
|
| 348.38 | 51.36 | 5 | 1 | 4.64 |
|
| 315.31 | 61.28 | 6 | 1 | 3.66 |
|
| 543.53 | 156.88 | 12 | 5 | −0.68 |