Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh1, Joseph C Carmichael1, Steven Mills1, Alessio Pigazzi1, Ninh T Nguyen1, Michael J Stamos2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. mstamos@uci.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study sought to compare outcomes of patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy with open and laparoscopic colectomy (LP). STUDY DESIGN: The NSQIP databases were used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent elective colectomy during 2012-2013. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the three surgical approaches. RESULTS: We sampled a total of 21,090 patients who underwent colectomy. Of these, 7480 (35.5 %) had open colectomy (OC), 8751 (41.5 %) had a laparoscopic colectomy, 2860 (13.6 %) had a HAL colectomy, and 1999 (9.5 %) had an open procedure converted from LC or HAL. Multivariate regression analysis revealed HAL colectomy had a similar mortality (AOR 0.53, P = 0.07) and a lower morbidity (AOR 0.37, P < 0.01) compared to OC. LC had lower mortality (AOR 0.58, P = 0.02) and morbidity (AOR 0.43, P < 0.01) compared to OC. Mortality of patients who underwent HAL was not significantly different from LC (AOR 0.90, P = 0.79); however, morbidity of such patients was significantly higher than for patients who underwent LC (AOR 1.29, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HAL colectomy is a safe approach with significant advantages compared to open colectomy. Although the morbidity of patients who underwent HAL is higher than patients who underwent LC, the morbidity rate is still lower than OC.
BACKGROUND: This study sought to compare outcomes of patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy with open and laparoscopic colectomy (LP). STUDY DESIGN: The NSQIP databases were used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent elective colectomy during 2012-2013. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the three surgical approaches. RESULTS: We sampled a total of 21,090 patients who underwent colectomy. Of these, 7480 (35.5 %) had open colectomy (OC), 8751 (41.5 %) had a laparoscopic colectomy, 2860 (13.6 %) had a HAL colectomy, and 1999 (9.5 %) had an open procedure converted from LC or HAL. Multivariate regression analysis revealed HAL colectomy had a similar mortality (AOR 0.53, P = 0.07) and a lower morbidity (AOR 0.37, P < 0.01) compared to OC. LC had lower mortality (AOR 0.58, P = 0.02) and morbidity (AOR 0.43, P < 0.01) compared to OC. Mortality of patients who underwent HAL was not significantly different from LC (AOR 0.90, P = 0.79); however, morbidity of such patients was significantly higher than for patients who underwent LC (AOR 1.29, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:HAL colectomy is a safe approach with significant advantages compared to open colectomy. Although the morbidity of patients who underwent HAL is higher than patients who underwent LC, the morbidity rate is still lower than OC.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colectomy; Colon surgery; Hand assisted; Laparoscopic surgery
Authors: Christopher J Goodenough; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mylan T Nguyen; Julie L Holihan; Zeinab Alawadi; Duyen H Nguyen; Juan R Flores; Nestor T Arita; J Scott Roth; Mike K Liang Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Brian F Gilmore; Zhifei Sun; Mohamed Adam; Jina Kim; Brian Ezekian; Cecilia Ong; John Migaly; Christopher R Mantyh Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Douglas M Overbey; Michelle L Cowan; Patrick W Hosokawa; Brandon C Chapman; Jon D Vogel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Stefan van Oostendorp; Arthur Elfrink; Wernard Borstlap; Linda Schoonmade; Colin Sietses; Jeroen Meijerink; Jurriaan Tuynman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 4.584