| Literature DB >> 25627662 |
Xin-Kui Li1, Xu Liu2, Lu Che3, Chi-Jiao Ma4, Dino Samartzis5, Hai-Qiang Wang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expansive open-door laminoplasty is widely accepted as a reliable procedure for cervical myelopathy. However, one acknowledged complication is spring-back complication or closure of the door which may result in restenosis of cervical canal and neurologic deterioration. The study aimed for addressing our cervical open-door laminoplasty technique with sutures and bone grafts and subsequently the follow-up outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25627662 PMCID: PMC4314791 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0151-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Demonstration of the surgical technique. A,B Schematic diagram showing the technique. The bone gutter is made and a hole is drilled on the lamina. The lamina is elevated with suture. In the panels, A represents decompression site; whereas O represents hinged site. θ represents the angle the lamina is evaluated. C Intra-operative picture delineates the surgical technique. C3-7 is elevated and fixed with suture.
Figure 2Lateral radiographs showing expanded canal. A Preoperative radiograph. B Immediate postoperative radiograph demonstrating elevated laminas. C Postoperative radiograph demonstrating the measurements of anteroposterior diameters of elevated laminas.
Figure 3Representative CT images. A Three-D CT demonstrating expanded canal. Six-year postoperative 3-D CT with canal expansion maintained. B One-year postoperative sagittal CT image of a 62-year-old male. C–F Axial CT images of the case corresponding C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7.
Figure 4Series MRI of a female patient undergoing laminoplasty with the novel technique. A Preoperative MRI. B Immediate postoperative MRI demonstrating canal expansion with huge herniated C4/5 disc. Note the posterior shift of cervical spinal cord. C Five-years postoperative MRI demonstrating the vanished herniated C4/5 disc with improved neurologic manifestation.
APD increments and expansion ratio after laminoplasty in the literature
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hirabayashi [ | EL | PLR | Mean increase 3–4 mm |
| Hirabayashi [ | EL | PLR | 4.4 mm |
| Chiba [ | EL | PLR | 4.4–5.9 mm |
| Satomi [ | EL | PLR | 3.0 mm |
| Yang [ | Suture anchor fixation | CT | 38.4–54.3% |
| Baba [ | En bloc | 3D CT | Mean increase 42% |
| Baba [ | Tomita | CT | 6.8 mm 40% |
| O’Brien [ | Titanium | ||
| Miniplate | CT | 8.4 mm 105% | |
| Wang [ | Anchor system | PLR | 6.3 mm 64% |
| Itoh [ | Bone blocks with wire ligatures | PLR | 4.1 mm |
| This study | Simple sutures | PLR | 8.01 mm 136.23% |
EL: Expansive open-door laminoplasty; PLR: Plain lateral radiograph; CT: Computed tomography.