Literature DB >> 25626938

Morbidity and mortality of pancreatic tumors undergoing surgical treatment.

Luiza Bueno Zeni1, Ricardo Fantazzini Russi1, Alexandre Faleiro Fialho1, Ana Luiza Pagani Fonseca1, Lyara Schaefer Sombrio1, Igor Cunha Rocha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a high mortality rate due to late diagnosis and aggressive behavior. The prognosis is poor, with 5-year survival occurring in less than 5% of cases. AIM: To analyze demographic characteristics, comorbidities, type of procedure and early postoperative complications of patients with pancreatic cancer submitted to surgical treatment.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study with analysis of 28 medical records of patients with malignant tumors of the pancreas in a 62 month. Data collection was performed from the medical records of the hospital.
RESULTS: Of the total, 53,6% were male and the mean age was 60.25 years. According to the procedure, 53,6% was submitted to duodenopancreactectomy the remainder to biliodigestive derivation or distal pancreatectomy. The ductal adenocarcinoma occurred in 82,1% and 92,9% of tumors were located in the pancreatic head. Early postoperative complications occurred in 64,3% of cases and the most prevalent was intra-abdominal abscess (32,1%). Among duodenopancreactectomies 77,8% had early postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: Its necessary to encourage early detection of tumors of the pancreas to raise the number operations with curative intent. Refinements in surgical techniques and surgical teams can diminish postoperative complications and, so, operative morbimortality can also decrease over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25626938      PMCID: PMC4743221          DOI: 10.1590/S0102-67202014000400011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig        ISSN: 0102-6720


INTRODUCTION

The incidence of pancreatic cancer in the United States is 13.6 per 100,000 in men and 10.7 per 100,000 in women[13]. In Brazil, this disease is responsible for about 2% of all diagnosed cancers and 4% of all cancer deaths[4]. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 5%[7]. Ductal adenocarcinoma is preferentially localized to the head of the organ(47-65%), followed by the body and tail (15-18%)[8]. The treatment of choice is surgical[14], although not all patients are candidates for this kind of treatment, in which postoperative complications occur in 33.6%, most commonly due to infections (13.8%) followed by pleural effusion (9.8%)[14]. Patients with pancreatic cancer have been studied and observed over a long period of time, and these studies report an increasing incidence of the disease[30,17]. However, there is also a study reporting a decline[22]. In any event, the prognosis is bleak[10], but with improved long-term survival[22,30,6]. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the demographic characteristics, comorbidities, type of surgical procedure, and early postoperative complications in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed at the General Surgery Service of the Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil and approved by the Committee for Ethics in Research at the hospital. The medical records of 28 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic tumors between January, 2008 and February, 2013, were analyzed. The patient charts were obtained from the Medical Archive Service as well as hospital electronic records. The data were recorded on a data collection instrument built exclusively for this study, containing biological and clinical variables pertaining to tumor and postoperative characteristics. All charts of patients suffering from pancreatic cancer and subjected to surgical treatment of any kind were included in the study, and those who received surgical treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis or those with insufficient chart data were excluded. Results were entered into the Microsoft Excel Program (OU Epi-DATA) and exported to SPSS 16 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 16). Data were analyzed and described as absolute and relative frequencies. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized to test for homogeneity of proportions. The significance level was set to a value of p<0.05.

RESULTS

The medical records of 28 patients were analyzed. Fifteen (53.6%) were men. The average age was 60.25 years old (39-89). Weight varied between 44 and 90 kg, with a mean value of 64.8 kg. Three types of surgical procedure were studied. The majority of patients (53.6%) underwent duodenopancreatectomy. Biliodigestive derivations, for palliative treatment, were performed in 39.3%. In both groups the neoplasms were localized to the head of the pancreas. In 7.1% of the patients, pancreatectomy of the tail and body was performed, since the neoplasm was localized to the body/tail. Comorbidities of the participants, smoking, diabetes mellitus, alcoholism and systemic arterial hypertension were studied (Table 1).
Table 1

Lifestyle factors and associated comorbidities

VariableN%
Smoking  
    Smoker0725.0
    Non-smoker1553.6
    Ex-smoker0621.4
Diabetes melitus  
    Yes0932.1
    No1967.9
Alcoholism  
    Yes0621.4
    No2278.6
Arterial hypertension  
    Yes1139.3
    No1760.7
Other1450.0
Lifestyle factors and associated comorbidities The tumor characteristics analyzed were histological type, T stage and N (lymph node) stage (Table 2).
Table 2

Tumor characteristics

VariableN%
Histological type   
    Ductal adenocarcinoma2382.1
    Acinar carcinoma013.60
    Cystic neoplasm013.60
    Endocrine neoplasm027.10
    Other013.60
Localization of tumor   
    Head2692.9
    Body/tail027.10
T stage   
    T10415.4
    T20415.4
    T30830.7
    T41038.5
N stage   
    NX0933.3
    N01244.5
    N10622.2
Tumor characteristics Values of the tumor marker CA 19-9 were collected from 24 patients. The analysis demonstrated that 50% of the patients had values ≤37 U/ml; 20.8%, between 37.1 and 369.9 U/ml; 29.2%, ≥370 U/ml, and 14.2% had no information concerning the marker. The values varied between 1.2 and 84476.5 U/ml. The most common early surgical complications were intra-abdominal abscesses (32.1%), followed by delayed gastric emptying (25.0%), and pancreatic fistulas (21.4%). Among patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy, four had a pancreatic fistula and two, pancreatic and biliary fistulas. Surgical reintervention for early postoperative complications of any kind occurred in five patients. Early non-surgical complications that stood out were respiratory (50.0%) - pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency - followed by cardiologic - acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation - and renal - hypokalemia and metabolic acidosis (Table 3).
Table 3

Early postoperative complications

Complicationn (%)
Surgical  
    Intra-abdominal abscess09 (32.1)
    Delay in gastric emptying07 (25.0)
    Pancreatic fistula06 (21.4)
    Biliary fistula05 (17.9)
    Digestive fistula04 (14.3)
    Surgical wound infection03 (10.7)
    Abdominal sepsis03 (10.7)
    Postoperative hemorrhage02 (7.10)
    Other05 (17.9)
Non-surgical  
    Respiratory14 (50.0)
    Cardiologic07 (25.0)
    Renal 07 (25.0)
    Other09 (32.1)
Early postoperative complications Male patients experienced 55.6% of all early postoperative complications. The diabetics experienced 44.4% of the complications, and smokers, 33.3% (Table 4).
Table 4

Association of gender and comorbidities with early postoperative complications

Variable Complications Total p value
YesNo
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Gender    0.778
    Female08 (44.4)05 (50.0)13 (46.4) 
    Male10 (55.6)05 (50.0)15 (53.6) 
    Total10 (100)18 (100)28 (100) 
Smoker    0.112
    Yes06 (33.3)01 (10.0)07 (25.0) 
    No07 (38.9)08 (80.0)15 (53.6) 
    Ex-smoker05 (27.8)01 (10.0)06 (21.4) 
Diabetes melitus    0.098
    Yes08 (44.4)01 (10.0)09 (32.1) 
    No10 (55.6)09 (90.0)19 (67.9) 
Arterial hypertension    1.000
    Yes07 (38.9)04 (40.0)11 (39.3) 
    No11 (61.1)06 (60.0)17 (60.7) 
Alcoholism    1.000
    Yes04 (22.2)02 (20.0)06 (21.4) 
    No14 (77.8)08 (80.0)66 (78.6) 
Association of gender and comorbidities with early postoperative complications Among participants in stage T3, 35.4% showed complications; amongT4 patients, only 17.6%; and all T1 and T2 patients showed early postoperative complications. There was a statistically significant association between the size of the tumor and all early postoperative complications (p=0.018) (Table 5).
Table 5

Association between tumor characteristics and early postoperative complications

Variable Complications Total p value
YesNo
n(%)n(%)n(%)
T Stage    0.018
    T104 (23.5)-04 (15.4) 
    T204 (23.5)-04 (15.4) 
    T306 (35.4)02 (22.2)08 (30.7) 
    T403 (17.6)07 (77.8)10 (38.5) 
N stage    0.570
    NX06 (33.3)03 (33.4)09 (33.3) 
    N009 (50.0)03 (33.3)12 (44.5) 
    N103 (16.7)03 (33.3)06 (22.2) 
Histological type    0.626
    Ductal adenocarcinoma14 (77.6)09 (90.0)23 (82.1) 
    Acinar neopalsm01 (5.60)-01 (3.60) 
    Cystic neoplasm01 (5.60)-01 (3.60) 
    Endocrine neoplasm01 (5.60)01 (10.0)02 (7.10) 
    Other01 (5.60)-01 (3.60) 
Location    1.000
    Head17 (94.4%)09 (90%)26 (92.9%) 
    Body/Tail01 (5.60%)01 (10.0%)02 (7.10%) 
Association between tumor characteristics and early postoperative complications Among patients undergoing duodenopancreatectomies, biliodigestive derivations, and body-tail pancreatectomies, 77.8%, 16.7%, and 5.6% showed complications, respectively. Diabetes mellitus was associated with the following postoperative complications: fistulas (the three types studied), infections (sepsis, surgical wound infections, and intra-abdominal abscesses), delayed gastric emptying and renal complications. Smoking was associated with surgical reintervention, fistulas and respiratory complications, and asthma was associated with fistulas (Table 6).
Table 6

Association between the type of surgery performed and early postoperative complications

Surgical procedure Complications Total p value
YesNo
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Duodenopancreatectomy14 (77.8)01 (10.0)15 (53.6)0.002
Biliodigestive derivation03 (16.7)08 (80.0)11 (39.3) 
Body/tail pancreatectomy01 (5.60)01 (10.0)02 (7.10) 
Total18 (100)10 (100)28 (100) 
Association between the type of surgery performed and early postoperative complications

DISCUSSION

Cancer of the pancreas is most prevalent in men[14,17,22]. Lowenfels and Maisonneuve attribute this to the difference in the number of smokers, which is greater in males. This difference tends to disappear due to increases in women smokers[20] or the tendency of women to live longer than men[17,9]. Several authors point out that the predominant age of patients with pancreatic cancer is above 60 years old[14,22,18,11]. Rocha et al.[26], analyzing patients in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, reported a mean age of 59 years old, coinciding with world trends. Cancers in patients undergoing duodenopancreatectomy progressed as far as stage II-B[29], and T3N1M0 occurred at the highest frequency. When isolated tumors were studied, it was found that the majority (38.5%) were grouped in stage T4. However, when the surgical procedure was analyzed, it was found that the majority of patients underwent duodenopancreatectomy because they were in stages T1-T3, that is, the sum total of the tumors staged in T1-T3 was greater than those staged exclusively in T4, explaining the prevalence of duodenopancreatectomy as the surgical procedure in this study rather than a palliative surgical procedure. Such data are in accordance with other studies[14,11] that recommend resection up to stage II-B. However, Lefebvre et al.[17] and Abraham et al.[1] demonstrated a similar likelihood of curative surgical operations in their studies, at around 11%. Smoking is considered responsible for about 20-30% of pancreatic neoplasms in the western population[16]. Lowenfels et al.[21] showed that smokers develop pancreatic cancer between three and four years before non-smokers. The smoking population has a 70% greater risk of developing a pancreatic malignancy than the non-smoking population. To stop or never start smoking is considered a preventive factor[21,25]. The incidence of diabetes melitus is higher in patients with pancreatic cancer, but the relationship between diabetes and cancer is controversial. Some studies indicate that diabetes is a risk factor for the development of pancreatic cancer, while others argue that diabetes could be a manifestation of cancer already in existence. Liao et al.[19] demonstrated that diabetic patients, less than two years after their initial diagnosis, have an increased incidence of pancreatic cancer. However, at longer periods following the diagnosis, patients show no significant difference. Chiari et al.[5] observed that diabetes melitus can be an early manifestation of pancreatic cancer rather than a risk factor. Preoperative alcoholic participants made up 1/4 of the total, but there were no records mentioning the quantity of alcoholic beverages consumed. The International Agency for Research on Cancer published a monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to consider alcohol a risk factor for development of pancreatic cancer[27]. However, Gupta et al.[10] support the occurrence of pancreatic cancer in the subgroup of patients exhibiting excessive alcohol consumption, independently of smoking. Studies demonstrate a higher incidence of adenocarcinomas in relation to other histological types[2] and localization to the head of the pancreas[8,17,11]. The tumor marker most commonly utilized in the diagnosis and prognosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer is the tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9). Around 70-90% of patients with pancreatic cancer express this marker in a manner sensitive to the stage of the disease[25]. It is not uncommon to find patients with small tumors but normal values of CA19-9. It is thought that the marker is elevated in only half of the patients with tumors of 2 cm or less[3]. Kim et al.[15] found that, at its cut-off value of 37 U/ml, its sensitivity and specificity were 76.7% and 87.1 %, respectively. Patients with very high levels of CA 19-9 (more than 1000 U/ml) are very likely to have inoperable cancer[3]. Lermite et al.[18] state that intra-abdominal abscesses are frequently associated with pancreatic and biliary fistulas. Diagnosis of a suspected fistula can be made by means of clinical data and confirmed by biochemical methods and imaging. In the present study, diagnosis of this complication was based solely on clinical observation, because the method used to confirm the diagnosis was not mentioned in the chart records, only the presence or absence of the complication. Therefore, in the diagnosis of a fistula, the characteristics of the drained liquid were taken into account; except in a few cases in which amylase was measured in the drained liquid, no laboratory testing or imaging was used to study this. A digestive fistula was considered one whose liquid contained gastrointestinal secretions. A biliary fistula was considered one whose liquid was yellow-brown in color with crystals in the pancreatic liquid. Pancreatic fistulas occur in 10-15% of patients subjected to duodenopancreatectomy, in agreement with Lermite et al.[18]. However, as this complication depends on various factors, there are investigators who report a lower rate. Kamphues et al.[14] found them in 1.4% of 442 surgically treated patients and Amico et al.[2], in 50% of 54 surgically treated patients. Among the local factors related to the genesis of pancreatic fistulas, the consistency of the pancreatic remnant (soft, normal or hard) and the caliber of the pancreatic ducts are noteworthy. Subjective evaluation of the greater consistency of the pancreas, associated with ductal dilatation, contributed to a lower incidence of pancreatic fistulas[23]. In the indicated study, this complication was unrelated to the consistency of the gland or to the type of anastomosis used (duct-to-mucosa or telescoping of the pancreatic stump). Delayed gastric emptying is, by definition, persistent gastric stasis requiring nasogastric aspiration for a period of at least 10 days or solid food intolerance for up to 14 postoperative days. Various factors are related to the onset of this complication, notably previous abdominal operations, diabetes, malnutrition and postoperative intra-abdominal complications[12]. According to Kamphues et al.[14], the most common non-surgical complication was of the cardiopulmonary type, occurring in 12.4% of the patients undergoing duodenopancreatectomy, and surgical reintervention took place in 10.3% of the cases. Already in the study of Rocha et al.[26], the nonsurgical complication that occurred the most was pneumonia (12.2%) along with surgical wound infection (12.2%). In the present study, total early postoperative complications came to 64.3%. This observation is at variance with Kamphues et al.[14]and in harmony with Rocha et al.[26], who obtained values of 33.6 and 58%, respectively. In the study under discussion, 77.8% of the patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy showed early complications postoperatively; among those subjected to biliodigestive derivation, only 16.7%; and among the remaining patients, who underwent corpocaudal pancreatectomy, 5.6%, Theoretically, one would expect to find a higher frequency of complications in patients undergoing duodenopancreatectomy when compared to those subjected to corpocaudal pancreatectomy. In the former case, the procedure is technically more complex, resulting in a longer period in surgery and the eventual need for a blood transfusion. In the latter case, the number of patients with tumors of the pancreatic body and tail was decidedly small, when compared with tumors of the head (based on the frequency of malignant tumors localized to the pancreas), and as a consequence, corpocaudal pancreatectomy was performed only a few times. Perhaps more instances of this procedure would reduce such a difference. A similar explanation may apply to cases in which the patients underwent biliodigestive derivation.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to encourage early detection of pancreatic tumors to increase the number of operations with curative potential. Refinements in surgical techniques and surgical teams could also diminish postoperative complications and thereby decrease operative morbimortality over time.
  19 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in patients with hereditary pancreatitis.

Authors:  A B Lowenfels; P Maisonneuve; D C Whitcomb; M M Lerch; E P DiMagno
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Risk of pancreatic cancer by alcohol dose, duration, and pattern of consumption, including binge drinking: a population-based study.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Furong Wang; Elizabeth A Holly; Paige M Bracci
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Norway: trends in incidence, basis of diagnosis and survival 1965-2007.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Bjarte Aagnes; Bjørn Møller; Arne Westgaard; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  CA 19-9 in pancreatic cancer: retrospective evaluation of patients with suspicion of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Victor Molina; Laura Visa; Carles Conill; Salvador Navarro; Jose M Escudero; Jose M Auge; Xavier Filella; Miguel A Lopez-Boado; Joana Ferrer; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Rafael Molina
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-12-29

5.  A new strategy for the application of CA19-9 in the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer: analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  H J Kim; M H Kim; S J Myung; B C Lim; E T Park; K S Yoo; D W Seo; S K Lee; Y I Min
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prognostic factors for survival in pancreatic cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Renee A Desmond; C Mel Wilcox; Reda J Wilson; Pavan Manchikalapati; Mona M Fouad; Isam Eltoum; Selwyn M Vickers
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Complications after pancreatectomies: prospective study after ISGFP and ISGPS new classifications.

Authors:  Enio Campos Amico; José Roberto Alves; Samir Assi João; Priscila Luana Franco Costa Guimarães; Elio José Silveira da Silva Barreto; Leonardo Silveira da Silva Barreto; Paulo Renato Leal Costa; Joafran Alexandre Costa de Medeiros
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

8.  Pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes mellitus: prevalence and temporal association with diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Suresh T Chari; Cynthia L Leibson; Kari G Rabe; Lawrence J Timmons; Jeanine Ransom; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Does quality of observational studies affect the results of a meta-analysis?: the case of cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe La Torre; Chiara de Waure; Maria Lucia Specchia; Nicola Nicolotti; Silvio Capizzi; Antonella Bilotta; Gennaro Clemente; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Rune Erichsen; Frank V Mortensen; Sarunas Dikinis; Mette Nørgaard; Jacob Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  7 in total

1.  SOLID PSEUDOPAPILLARY NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS.

Authors:  Jorge Roberto Marcante Carlotto; Franz Robert Apodaca Torrez; Adriano Miziara Gonzalez; Marcelo Moura Linhares; Tarcisio Triviño; Benedito Herani-Filho; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho; Edson José Lobo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

2.  UNDERSTANDING THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR ACUTE PANCREATITIS: CLASSIFICATION OF ATLANTA 2012.

Authors:  Gleim Dias de Souza; Luciana Rodrigues Queiroz Souza; Ronaldo Máfia Cuenca; Bárbara Stephane de Medeiros Jerônimo; Guilherme Medeiros de Souza; Vinícius Martins Vilela
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

3.  Expression of CD44 in pancreatic cancer and its significance.

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Li; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Lei-Zhen Zheng; Wei-Jian Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  PRE-OPERATIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE IN THE PERIAMPULLARY NEOPLASIA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Gustavo Costa Marques de Lucena; Rinaldo Antunes Barros
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-07-02

Review 5.  Roles of Commensal Microbiota in Pancreas Homeostasis and Pancreatic Pathologies.

Authors:  Camila Leal-Lopes; Fernando J Velloso; Julia C Campopiano; Mari C Sogayar; Ricardo G Correa
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.011

6.  Proposal for a structured computed tomography report in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms based on expert opinions.

Authors:  Paulo Gustavo Maciel Lopes; Carlos Alberto Matsumoto; Edson José Lobo; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

7.  The increasing burden of pancreatic cancer in Brazil from 2000 to 2019: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors:  Diogo Oliveira Chaves; Aline Cândida Bastos; Alessandra Maciel Almeida; Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra; Maria Teresa Bustamante Teixeira; Ana Paula Souto Melo; Valéria Maria de Azeredo Passos
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.141

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.