Literature DB >> 27759788

UNDERSTANDING THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR ACUTE PANCREATITIS: CLASSIFICATION OF ATLANTA 2012.

Gleim Dias de Souza1,2, Luciana Rodrigues Queiroz Souza1, Ronaldo Máfia Cuenca1, Bárbara Stephane de Medeiros Jerônimo2, Guilherme Medeiros de Souza2, Vinícius Martins Vilela2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Contrast computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are widely used due to its image quality and ability to study pancreatic and peripancreatic morphology. The understanding of the various subtypes of the disease and identification of possible complications requires a familiarity with the terminology, which allows effective communication between the different members of the multidisciplinary team. Aim: Demonstrate the terminology and parameters to identify the different classifications and findings of the disease based on the international consensus for acute pancreatitis ( Atlanta Classification 2012).
Methods: Search and analysis of articles in the "CAPES Portal de Periódicos with headings "acute pancreatitis" and "Atlanta Review".
Results: Were selected 23 articles containing radiological descriptions, management or statistical data related to pathology. Additional statistical data were obtained from Datasus and Population Census 2010. The radiological diagnostic criterion adopted was the Radiology American College system. The "acute pancreatitis - 2012 Rating: Review Atlanta classification and definitions for international consensus" tries to eliminate inconsistency and divergence from the determination of uniformity to the radiological findings, especially the terminology related to fluid collections. More broadly as "pancreatic abscess" and "phlegmon" went into disuse and the evolution of the collection of patient fluids can be described as "acute peripancreatic collections", "acute necrotic collections", "pseudocyst" and "necrosis pancreatic walled or isolated".
Conclusion: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance represent the best techniques with sequential images available for diagnosis. Standardization of the terminology is critical and should improve the management of patients with multiple professionals care, risk stratification and adequate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759788      PMCID: PMC5074676          DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201600030018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig        ISSN: 0102-6720


  28 in total

1.  The continuing challenge of early mortality in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  C J McKay; C W Imrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Sonography in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Fluid collections in and around the pancreas in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Alexander Brun; Nanakram Agarwal; C S Pitchumoni
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study.

Authors:  B W M Spanier; Y Nio; R W M van der Hulst; H A R E Tuynman; M G W Dijkgraaf; M J Bruno
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 5.  Acute Pancreatitis: Revised Atlanta Classification and the Role of Cross-Sectional Imaging.

Authors:  Ken Zhao; Sharon Z Adam; Rajesh N Keswani; Jeanne M Horowitz; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  MDCT of acute mild (nonnecrotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections.

Authors:  Dipti K Lenhart; Emil J Balthazar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; P C Freeny; E vanSonnenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D J Cook; N V Christou; G R Bernard; C L Sprung; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Severity assessment of acute pancreatitis: applying Marshall scoring system.

Authors:  André Lanza Carioca; Debora Rodrigues Jozala; Lucas Oliveira de Bem; Jose Mauro da Silva Rodrigues
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

10.  Morbidity and mortality of pancreatic tumors undergoing surgical treatment.

Authors:  Luiza Bueno Zeni; Ricardo Fantazzini Russi; Alexandre Faleiro Fialho; Ana Luiza Pagani Fonseca; Lyara Schaefer Sombrio; Igor Cunha Rocha
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec
View more
  2 in total

1.  Beneficial Effect of Kidney Bean Resistant Starch on Hyperlipidemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis and Related Intestinal Barrier Damage in Rats.

Authors:  Zhaohang Zuo; Shuting Liu; Weiqiao Pang; Baoxin Lu; Wei Sun; Naidan Zhang; Xinyu Zhou; Dongjie Zhang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS: DESCRIPTION OF VIDEOSCOPIC ASSISTED RETROPERITONEAL DEBRIDEMENT (VARD) TECHNIQUE WITH COVERED METALLIC STENT.

Authors:  Eduardo J Houghton; Alain A García Vázquez; Manuel E Zeledón; Andrea Andreacchio; Gabriel Ruiz; Mariano Palermo; Mariano E Gimenez
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-07-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.