| Literature DB >> 25625035 |
Sartaj Ahmad Bhat1, Jaswinder Singh2, Adarsh Pal Vig1.
Abstract
In the present work bagEntities:
Keywords: Bagasse waste; Eisenia fetida; Growth and population; Sugar mill waste; Vermicomposting
Year: 2015 PMID: 25625035 PMCID: PMC4302158 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-014-0780-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Initial physico-chemical properties of bagasse and cattle dung
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.55 ± 0.07 | 8.35 ± 0.08 |
| EC (mS/cm) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 4.13 ± 0.17 |
| TKN (%) | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 1.34 ± 0.01 |
| TOC (%) | 55.53 ± 0.27 | 46.28 ± 0.52 |
| C:N ratio | 213.57 ± 10.6 | 34.53 ± 0.26 |
| TAP (%) | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.06 |
| TK (%) | 3.19 ± 0.04 | 2.23 ± 0.04 |
| TNa (%) | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 8.09 ± 0.28 |
| Zna | 21.54 ± 0.24 | 63.52 ± 1.62 |
| Cua | 18.6 ± 1.41 | 55.57 ± 3.73 |
| Cra | 26.03 ± 2.64 | 56.77 ± 4.28 |
| Fea | 249.5 ± 7.67 | 1483 ± 6.44 |
| Mna | 16.79 ± 1.72 | 83.09 ± 0.38 |
aWeight in mg/Kg.
Percentages of bagasse and cattle dung in different proportions on dry weight basis
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| B0 | 0 | 100 |
| B25 | 25 | 75 |
| B50 | 50 | 50 |
| B75 | 75 | 25 |
| B100 | 100 | 0 |
Figure 1Mean values of number of earthworms followed by different letters in a same day are significantly different (one-way ANOVA; Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05) in different feed mixtures of bagasse and cattle dung.
Figure 2Mean values of earthworm biomass (g) followed by different letters in a same day are significantly different (one-way ANOVA; Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05) in different feed mixtures of bagasse and cattle dung.
Figure 3Mean values of number of cocoons followed by different letters in a same day are significantly different (one-way ANOVA; Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05) in different feed mixtures of bagasse and cattle dung.
Figure 4Mean values of number of hatchlings followed by different letters in a same day are significantly different (one-way ANOVA; Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05) in different feed mixtures of bagasse and cattle dung.
Figure 5Mean values of hatchlings biomass (g) followed by different letters in a same day are significantly different (one-way ANOVA; Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05) in different feed mixtures of bagasse and cattle dung.
Initial and final nutrient content (mean ± S.E.) and percent change over initial of different proportions of bagasse and cattle dung
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Initial | 8.35 ± 0.08 | 8.25 ± 0.02 | 8.13 ± 0.04 | 7.77 ± 0.04 | 6.55 ± 0.07 |
| Final | 7.12 ± 0.05* | 7.08 ± 0.08** | 7.41 ± 0.04* | 7.30 ± 0.04* | 7.13 ± 0.06 | |
| % change | −14.73 | −14.18 | −8.85 | −6.04 | 8.85 | |
|
| Initial | 4.13 ± 0.17 | 3.86 ± 0.08 | 3.23 ± 0.14 | 1.63 ± 0.08 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Final | 5.46 ± 0.14* | 4.60 ± 0.11** | 4.90 ± 0.11** | 2.96 ± 0.12* | 2.23 ± 0.12* | |
| % change | 32.20 | 19.17 | 51.70 | 81.59 | 102.72 | |
|
| Initial | 1.34 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 |
| Final | 2.0 ± 0.03** | 1.77 ± 0.06** | 1.67 ± 0.04** | 1.06 ± 0.03** | 0.86 ± 0.04** | |
| % change | 49.25 | 113.25 | 142.02 | 146.51 | 230.76 | |
|
| Initial | 46.28 ± 0.52 | 49.92 ± 0.07 | 50.30 ± 0.10 | 54.25 ± 0.36 | 55.53 ± 0.27 |
| Final | 33.79 ± 0.36** | 32.25 ± 0.65** | 32.44 ± 0.56** | 44.51 ± 0.27** | 49.53 ± 0.35* | |
| % change | −26.98 | −35.39 | −35.50 | −17.95 | −10.80 | |
|
| Initial | 34.53 ± 0.26 | 60.14 ± 2.39 | 72.89 ± 5.52 | 126.16 ± 4.05 | 213.57 ± 10.6 |
| Final | 16.89 ± 0.43** | 18.22 ± 0.78** | 19.42 ± 0.62* | 41.99 ± 1.28** | 57.59 ± 2.86** | |
| % change | −51.08 | −69.70 | −73.35 | −66.71 | −73.03 | |
|
| Initial | 0.59 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.05 |
| Final | 1.08 ± 0.05** | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.04** | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | |
| % change | 83.05 | 47.91 | 88.88 | 42.85 | 50.0 | |
|
| Initial | 2.23 ± 0.04 | 2.38 ± 0.03 | 2.48 ± 0.07 | 2.85 ± 0.02 | 3.19 ± 0.04 |
| Final | 1.96 ± 0.06 | 2.47 ± 0.04 | 2.78 ± 0.04 | 2.98 ± 0.04* | 3.26 ± 0.06 | |
| % change | −12.10 | 3.78 | 12.09 | 1.40 | 2.19 | |
|
| Initial | 8.09 ± 0.28 | 5.84 ± 0.15 | 5.09 ± 0.21 | 2.30 ± 0.09 | 1.08 ± 0.10 |
| Final | 13.42 ± 0.21** | 6.98 ± 0.27* | 7.75 ± 0.13* | 3.88 ± 0.07** | 2.53 ± 0.14* | |
| % change | 65.88 | 19.52 | 52.25 | 68.69 | 134.25 | |
|
| Initial | 63.52 ± 1.62 | 45.63 ± 0.55 | 34.8 ± 1.42 | 32.68 ± 0.59 | 21.54 ± 0.24 |
| Final | 120.6 ± 1.28** | 130.2 ± 3.31** | 115.5 ± 3.06** | 84.09 ± 6.19* | 60.63 ± 3.13** | |
| % change | 89.86 | 185.33 | 231.89 | 157.31 | 181.47 | |
|
| Initial | 55.57 ± 3.73 | 37.47 ± 1.31 | 32.17 ± 1.45 | 25.93 ± 1.59 | 18.6 ± 1.41 |
| Final | 41.33 ± 0.92* | 29.57 ± 1.07 | 25.4 ± 2.17 | 21.6 ± 1.41 | 15.47 ± 1.32 | |
| % change | −25.62 | −21.08 | −21.04 | −16.69 | −16.82 | |
|
| Initial | 56.77 ± 4.28 | 41.47 ± 1.45 | 18.5 ± 1.07 | 13.1 ± 1.38 | 26.03 ± 2.64 |
| Final | 21.07 ± 1.33** | 26.83 ± 1.29** | 15.43 ± 0.95 | 11.97 ± 0.61 | 22.77 ± 1.16 | |
| % change | −62.88 | −35.30 | −16.59 | −8.62 | −12.52 | |
|
| Initial | 1483 ± 6.44 | 760.1 ± 10.98 | 698.8 ± 6.80 | 334 ± 6.15 | 249.5 ± 7.67 |
| Final | 899 ± 11.15** | 998.9 ± 11.94** | 1030 ± 14.44** | 542.5 ± 6.06** | 459.1 ± 7.28** | |
| % change | −39.37 | 31.41 | 47.39 | 62.42 | 84.0 | |
|
| Initial | 83.09 ± 0.38 | 54.13 ± 0.71 | 45.34 ± 2.98 | 24.6 ± 2.14 | 16.79 ± 1.72 |
| Final | 181.4 ± 1.44** | 81.87 ± 3.67* | 66.7 ± 1.94* | 35.1 ± 2.80 | 20.67 ± 2.34 | |
| % change | 118.31 | 51.24 | 47.11 | 42.68 | 23.10 | |
aConcentrations in %.
bWeight in mg/kg.
Significance level was determined by student’s t-test. *p ≤ 0.05. **p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 6Scanning Electron Microscopy. a) Pre-vermicomposted cattle dung. b) Post-vermicomposted cattle dung. c) Pre-vermicomposted bagasse. d) Post-vermicomposted bagasse.