| Literature DB >> 27257977 |
Yukui Li1, Qingchuan Liu2, Fei Liu1, Pengfei Zhu1, Lichao Zhang1, Xiujie Zhou1, Chongyu Sun1, Yunhuan Cheng1.
Abstract
Domestic sewage sludge andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27257977 PMCID: PMC4892675 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Physicochemical characteristics of tested composting material (mean ± S.D).
| Parameters | Cattle manure (g) | Sewage sludge (g) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2000 | |
| 600 | 1400 | |
| 1000 | 1000 | |
| 1400 | 600 | |
| 2000 | 0 | |
| 42.7±1.28 | 34±1.54 | |
| 1.26±0.15 | 2.34±0.21 | |
| 1.35±0.11 | 1.26±0.07 | |
| 7.2±0.02 | 7.8±0.03 | |
| 3.43±0.05 | 2.58±0.09 | |
| 33.8±1.06 | 14.5±1.37 |
Changes of physicochemical quality of mixture under different ratios of sewage sludge and cattle manure.
| Physicochemical characteristics | CD-0 | CD-30 | CD-50 | CD-70 | CD-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOC (%) | |||||
| Initial | 34±1.39 | 36.61±1.51 | 38.35±2.32 | 40.09±1.78 | 42.7±1.55 |
| Final | 27.6±2.27 | 24.8±1.16 | 27.5±1.32 | 26.6±1.50 | 33.5±2.26 |
| | 10.18 | 15.65 | 15.78 | 62.50 | 25.8 |
| Percent change | -18.82 | -32.26 | -28.29 | -33.65 | -21.55 |
| TKN (%) | |||||
| Initial | 2.34±0.17 | 2.02±0.25 | 1.83±0.21 | 1.58±0.18 | 1.26±0.20 |
| Final | 2.65±0.13 | 2.34±0.21 | 2.16±0.22 | 1.77±0.19 | 1.35±0.22 |
| | -10.74 | -14.03 | -15.39 | -9.13 | -3.85 |
| Percent change | 13.25 | 15.84 | 18.03 | 12.03 | 7.14 |
| TP (%) | |||||
| Initial | 1.26±0.14 | 1.28±0.17 | 1.31±0.16 | 1.33±0.11 | 1.35±0.13 |
| Final | 1.21±0.15 | 1.25±0.16 | 1.26±0.15 | 1.26±0.13 | 1.27±0.12 |
| t-value | 4.56 | 2.09 | 5.0 | 3.69 | 5.09 |
| Percent change | -3.97 | -2.34 | -3.82 | -3.82 | -5.93 |
| Initial | 7.8±0.09 | 7.7±0.15 | 7.5±0.09 | 7.5±0.15 | 7.2±0.14 |
| Final | 6.6±0.17 | 6.9±0.09 | 6.7±0.13 | 6.8±0.09 | 6.4±0.09 |
| | 14.01 | 21.91 | 30.98 | 19.17 | 11.71 |
| Percent change | -15.38 | -10.39 | -9.46 | -9.33 | -11.11 |
| EC(ms·cm-1) | |||||
| Initial | 2.58±0.09 | 2.74±0.07 | 3.16±0.10 | 3.25±0.08 | 3.43±0.12 |
| Final | 2.13±0.12 | 2.05±0.09 | 2.65±0.12 | 2.38±0.16 | 3.07±0.12 |
| | 28.65 | 18.10 | 44.17 | 24.64 | 17.29 |
| Percent change | -17.44 | -25.18 | -16.14 | -26.77 | -10.50 |
| C/N ratio | |||||
| Initial | 14.58±0.97 | 18.3±2.18 | 21.1±1.65 | 25.5±1.76 | 34.4±4.2 |
| Final | 10.42±0.88 | 10.65±0.86 | 12.79±0.75 | 15.1±0.85 | 25.15±2.68 |
| | 13.35 | 11.85 | 20.09 | 22.99 | 9.13 |
| Percent change | -28.32 | -41.52 | -39.25 | -40.77 | -26.78 |
Note: CD indicates cattle manure; C/N ratio indicates C to N ratio.
*: 0.01
**: 0.001
***: P<0.001 (the same below).
Fig 1Growth curves of Eisenia fetida in different waste mixtures during vermicomposting.
The growth rate of Eisenia fetida among the all treatments (mg·worm-1·day-1).
| Treatment | Growth rate (mg·worm-1·day-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–28 day | 29–56 day | 57–91 day | 0–91 day | |
| 6.40±0.47c | 8.59±0.92b | 3.89±0.44c | 6.11±0.77b | |
| 7.20±1.23bc | 10.51±1.15a | 6.09±0.85b | 7.79±1.17a | |
| 7.94±0.68b | 10.82±1.35a | 5.64±0.62b | 7.94±1.24a | |
| 9.33±0.62a | 11.90±1.69a | 6.95±0.79a | 9.20±1.08a | |
| 8.21±0.72ab | 11.84±1.08a | 6.18±0.71ab | 8.55±1.65a | |
| 11.60 | 6.76 | 16.07 | 5.40 | |
Note: In the same column, means followed by the same superscript are not significantly different, while the means with different superscripts are significantly different (the same below).
**: 0.001
***: P<0.001.
Fig 2Sexual development of Eisenia fetida in the different diets.
Reproduction of Eisenia fetida in different waste mixtures (mean ± S.D, n = 6).
| Treatment | Cumulative cocoon production during trails | Cocoon production rate (Cocoon·worm-1) | No. of cocoon production (Cocoon·worm-1·day-1)) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 127±7.11d | 15.88±0.89d | 0.17±0.01d | |
| 153±8.18c | 19.13±1.02c | 0.21±0.01c | |
| 211±14.35b | 26.38±1.79b | 0.29±0.02b | |
| 233±10.5a | 29.16±1.31a | 0.32±0.01a | |
| 215±17.66b | 26.88±2.21b | 0.30±0.02b | |
| 92.58 | |||
Note: In the same column, means followed by the same superscript are not significantly different, while the means with different superscripts are significantly different.
***: P<0.001.
Contents of heavy metals of sewage sludge and cattle dung manure in the different treatments (mg/kg).
| Treatment | Antimony | Lead | Zinc | Cadmium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.36±0.09a | 43.38±1.55ab | 282.83±8.16a | 5.65±0.11a | |
| 3.29±0.14a | 44.65±1.31a | 278.93±4.88ab | 5.66±0.14a | |
| 3.28±0.12a | 43.42±1.42ab | 278.31±6.54ab | 5.49±0.1b | |
| 3.24±0.13a | 42.18±1.08b | 275.14±5.92b | 5.45±0.11bc | |
| 3.22±0.88b | 43.19±1.03ab | 275.38±5.24b | 5.34±0.08c | |
| 1.27 | 2.78 | 1.50 | 9.48 |
Note: In the same column, means followed by the same superscript are not significantly different, while the means with different superscripts are significantly different.
*: 0.01
***: P<0.001.