| Literature DB >> 27516924 |
Sartaj Ahmad Bhat1, Jaswinder Singh2, Adarsh Pal Vig1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the genotoxicity reduction in post vermicompost feed mixtures of bagasse (B) waste using earthworm Eisenia fetida. The genotoxicity of bagasse waste was determined by using Allium cepa root chromosomal aberration assay. Bagasse was amended with cattle dung in different proportions [0:100 (B0) 25:75 (B25), 50:50 (B50), 75:25 (B75) and 100:0 (B100)] on dry weight basis. Genotoxic effects of initial and post vermicompost bagasse extracts were analysed on the root tips cells of Allium cepa. Root length and mitotic index (MI) was found to be increased in post vermicompost extracts when compared to initial bagasse waste. The maximum percent increase of root length was observed in the B50 bagasse extract (96.60 %) and the maximum MI was observed in B100 mixture (14.20 ± 0.60) 6 h treatment which was similar to the control. Genotoxicity analysis of post vermicompost extracts of bagasse revealed a 21-44 % decline in the aberration frequencies and the maximum reduction was found in B75 extract (44.50 %). The increase in root length and mitotic index, as well as decrease in chromosomal aberrations indicates that E. fetida has the ability to reduce the genotoxicity of the bagasse waste.Entities:
Keywords: Allium cepa aberration assay; Eisenia fetida; Industrial waste; Toxicity; Vermicomposting
Year: 2016 PMID: 27516924 PMCID: PMC4963344 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2882-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Comparison of initial and post vermicompost extract showing increase in root length and clarity of final filtrate/extract
Mean (±SE) root length of A. cepa exposed to initial and post vermicompost bagasse (B) extract for 96 h
| Concentrations (%) | Initial bagasse waste | Post vermicompost |
|---|---|---|
| Mean root length (cm) | Mean root length (cm) | |
| 0 (control) | 3.66 ± 0.40 | 5.46 ± 0.41 (49.18) |
| 25 | 3.54 ± 0.25 | 6.76 ± 0.36* (90.96) |
| 50 | 3.24 ± 0.29 | 6.37 ± 0.21* (96.60) |
| 75 | 2.96 ± 0.14 | 4.55 ± 0.31** (53.71) |
| 100 | 2.18 ± 0.33 | 3.40 ± 0.17 (55.96) |
The significance level was determined by Student’s paired ‘t’ test
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Percent change is shown in parenthesis
Effect of initial and post vermicompost extract of bagasse (B) on mitotix index of the root meristimatic cells of A. cepa
| Concentration | Mitotic index in initial bagasse wastea | Mitotic Index in post vermicompostb |
|---|---|---|
| 0 % (control) | ||
| 6 h | 9.57 ± 0.34 | 11.83 ± 0.87 |
| 12 h | 10.62 ± 0.41 | 12.88 ± 0.07* |
| 25 % | ||
| 6 h | 9.97 ± 0.42 | 11.05 ± 0.42 |
| 12 h | 10.74 ± 0.15 | 11.35 ± 0.22* |
| 50 % | ||
| 6 h | 10.25 ± 0.53 | 12.27 ± 0.10* |
| 12 h | 11.53 ± 0.25 | 12.12 ± 0.34* |
| 75 % | ||
| 6 h | 9.69 ± 0.42 | 12.45 ± 0.18** |
| 12 h | 9.07 ± 0.54 | 12.12 ± 0.51* |
| 100 % | ||
| 6 h | 9.38 ± 0.03 | 14.20 ± 0.60* |
| 12 h | 10.17 ± 0.84 | 11.76 ± 0.58* |
The significance level was determined by Student’s ‘t’ test
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
aFrom each group 3802–4791 cells were scored to determine MI
bFrom each group 3180–4661 cells were scored to determine MI
Chromosomal aberrations in the root tip cells of A. cepa exposed to initial and post vermicompost bagasse extracts
| Types of chromosomal aberrations | 0 % (control) | 25 % | 50 % | 75 % | 100 % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Aberrant cellsa | No. of Aberrant cellsa | No. of Aberrant cellsa | No. of Aberrant cellsa | No. of Aberrant cellsa | ||||||
| 6 h | 12 h | 6 h | 12 h | 6 h | 12 h | 6 h | 12 h | 6 h | 12 h | |
| Physiological aberrations (PA) | ||||||||||
| C-mitosis | 3 (2) | 4 (2) | 7 (4) | 6 (1) | 9 (4) | 8 (5) | 7 (6) | 9 (5) | 9 (9) | 8 (10) |
| Delayed anaphase | 4 (4) | 6 (5) | 7 (6) | 12 (10) | 5 (7) | 11 (8) | 13 (10) | 15 (9) | 14 (13) | 19 (14) |
| Laggard/s | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 (1) | 2 (1) | 1 (1) |
| Stickiness | – | 1 | 3 (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 3 (2) | 6 (1) | 5 (2) | 6 (2) | 8 (3) |
| Vagrant/s | 3 (1) | 1 (1) | 5 (2) | 3 (2) | 6 (2) | 4 (1) | 7 (1) | 6 (2) | 8 (3) | 2 (4) |
| Total PA | 10 (7) | 12 (8) | 22(13) | 23 (14) | 22 (15) | 26 (16) | 33 (18) | 36 (19) | 39 (28) | 38 (32) |
| Clastogenic aberrations (CA) | ||||||||||
| Chromatin bridge/s | – (1) | 3 (2) | 3 (2) | 5 (3) | 5 (3) | 7 (5) | 7 (4) | 7 (5) | 6 (7) | 9 (6) |
| Chromosomal break/s | 2 | – | – | 1 | 2 (1) | 2 (1) | 3 (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (1) | 4 (2) |
| Total CA | 2 (1) | 3 (2) | 3 (2) | 6 (3) | 7 (4) | 9 (6) | 10 (5) | 9 (6) | 8 (8) | 13 (8) |
| Total aberrant cells (PA + CA) | 12 (8) | 15 (10) | 25 (15) | 29 (17) | 29 (19) | 35 (22) | 43 (23) | 45 (25) | 47 (36) | 51 (40) |
| Percent aberration (%) | 2.66 (1.77) | 3.33 (2.22) | 5.55 (3.33) | 6.44 (3.77) | 6.44 (4.22) | 7.77 (4.88) | 9.55* (5.11) | 10.0 (5.55) | 10.44* (8.0*) | 11.33* (8.88*) |
| Percent reduction (%) | 33.45 | 33.33 | 40.0 | 41.45 | 34.47 | 37.19 | 41.88 | 44.50 | 23.37 | 21.62 |
Values of chromosome aberrations in post vermicompost mixtures are shown in parenthesis
The significance level was determined by Chi square test, * P < 0.05
aData obtained from 450 cells
Fig. 2Root tip cells of Allium cepa showing normal stages (a, b, c, d) and chromosomal aberrations (e, f, g, h)