OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate (mpMRI) combined with MRI fusion technology during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy can enhance the detection of significant disease in patients with apparent low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 603 patients on AS for localized prostate cancer between January 2006 and September 2013. mpMRI before repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was obtained in 111 patients, of whom 69 underwent subsequent fusion biopsy (39 true and 30 cognitive) in addition to standard template biopsy. The results of fusion biopsy were compared with the standard biopsy. The primary endpoint was termination of AS. RESULTS: mpMRI detected 118 suspicious lesions in 70 patients (63%). Of these, 42 patients (60%) had lesions with Prostate imaging, reporting, and data system (PIRADS) score 3, and 28 patients (40%) had PIRADS score 4 or 5 lesions. AS was terminated in 27 (24.3%) of the 111 patients who underwent mpMRI. Seventeen patients stopped AS based on mpMRI findings including 16 for pathologic progression in target biopsies and 1 for lesion size increase, whereas the other 10 stopped AS because of pathologic progression in the standard cores (n = 6) or other reasons (n = 4). Use of mpMRI increased the rate of AS termination (27 vs. 10; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, PIRADS score 4-5 (vs. 3) was the only significant predictor of AS termination (P = .015). CONCLUSION: These preliminary retrospective findings suggest that mpMRI with subsequent fusion biopsy enhances the identification of AS patients requiring definitive treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate (mpMRI) combined with MRI fusion technology during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy can enhance the detection of significant disease in patients with apparent low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 603 patients on AS for localized prostate cancer between January 2006 and September 2013. mpMRI before repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was obtained in 111 patients, of whom 69 underwent subsequent fusion biopsy (39 true and 30 cognitive) in addition to standard template biopsy. The results of fusion biopsy were compared with the standard biopsy. The primary endpoint was termination of AS. RESULTS: mpMRI detected 118 suspicious lesions in 70 patients (63%). Of these, 42 patients (60%) had lesions with Prostate imaging, reporting, and data system (PIRADS) score 3, and 28 patients (40%) had PIRADS score 4 or 5 lesions. AS was terminated in 27 (24.3%) of the 111 patients who underwent mpMRI. Seventeen patients stopped AS based on mpMRI findings including 16 for pathologic progression in target biopsies and 1 for lesion size increase, whereas the other 10 stopped AS because of pathologic progression in the standard cores (n = 6) or other reasons (n = 4). Use of mpMRI increased the rate of AS termination (27 vs. 10; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, PIRADS score 4-5 (vs. 3) was the only significant predictor of AS termination (P = .015). CONCLUSION: These preliminary retrospective findings suggest that mpMRI with subsequent fusion biopsy enhances the identification of AS patients requiring definitive treatment.
Authors: Samrad Ghavimi; Hamidreza Abdi; Jennifer Waterhouse; Richard Savdie; Silvia Chang; Alison Harris; Lindsay Machan; Martin Gleave; Alan I So; Larry Goldenberg; Peter C Black Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Melissa Treviño; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Marcin Czarniecki; Peter L Choyke; Todd S Horowitz Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-01-03
Authors: Ariel A Schulman; Christina Sze; Efrat Tsivian; Rajan T Gupta; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Ottavio de Cobelli; Daniela Terracciano; Elena Tagliabue; Sara Raimondi; Danilo Bottero; Antonio Cioffi; Barbara Jereczek-Fossa; Giuseppe Petralia; Giovanni Cordima; Gilberto Laurino Almeida; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Carlo Buonerba; Deliu Victor Matei; Giuseppe Renne; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Matteo Ferro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240