BACKGROUND: Health-related information on the Internet is constantly increasing, but its quality and accountability are difficult to assess. Patients browse the Net to get more information, but the impact of the Internet on their decisions about surgical techniques, referral centers, or surgeon choice are still not clear. This study aimed to describe the role of the Internet in the decision-making process of obese patients seeking bariatric surgery. METHODS: Two hundred and twelve candidates for bariatric surgery were asked to answer a questionnaire evaluating their access to the Internet, the usefulness and trustworthiness of Internet-retrieved information, the verification of the information, and the role of the information in the decision-making process. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients answered the questionnaire. Of these, 95.1% had access to the Internet and 77.8% reported having researched about bariatric surgery. Their main interests were the surgical techniques (81.4%) and other patients' experiences (72.3%). The favorite Web sites were those affiliated to public hospitals or edited by other patients. The accountability of the e-information was mainly evaluated by discussion with the general practitioner (GP) (83.0%) or family members and friends (46.8%). One patient in four decided to undergo bariatric surgery mainly based on e-information, while discussion about treatment options with the GP and the hospital reputation were taken into account in 77.8 and 51.7% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients seeking bariatric surgery search for health information online. E-information seems to have an important role in the decision-making process of patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Health-related information on the Internet is constantly increasing, but its quality and accountability are difficult to assess. Patients browse the Net to get more information, but the impact of the Internet on their decisions about surgical techniques, referral centers, or surgeon choice are still not clear. This study aimed to describe the role of the Internet in the decision-making process of obesepatients seeking bariatric surgery. METHODS: Two hundred and twelve candidates for bariatric surgery were asked to answer a questionnaire evaluating their access to the Internet, the usefulness and trustworthiness of Internet-retrieved information, the verification of the information, and the role of the information in the decision-making process. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients answered the questionnaire. Of these, 95.1% had access to the Internet and 77.8% reported having researched about bariatric surgery. Their main interests were the surgical techniques (81.4%) and other patients' experiences (72.3%). The favorite Web sites were those affiliated to public hospitals or edited by other patients. The accountability of the e-information was mainly evaluated by discussion with the general practitioner (GP) (83.0%) or family members and friends (46.8%). One patient in four decided to undergo bariatric surgery mainly based on e-information, while discussion about treatment options with the GP and the hospital reputation were taken into account in 77.8 and 51.7% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients seeking bariatric surgery search for health information online. E-information seems to have an important role in the decision-making process of patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery.
Authors: Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005 Dec 12-26
Authors: Onofre Alarcón-Fernández; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; Marta Carrillo-Palau; David Nicolás-Pérez; Antonio Z Gimeno; Laura Ramos; Manuel Hernández Guerra de Aguilar; Carlos Casanova; Alejandro Jiménez; Enrique Quintero-Carrión Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Fabrizio Bert; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Silvio Brusaferro; Elisabetta De Vito; Chiara de Waure; Giuseppe La Torre; Lamberto Manzoli; Gabriele Messina; Tullia Todros; Maria Valeria Torregrossa; Roberta Siliquini Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Hege K Andreassen; Maria M Bujnowska-Fedak; Catherine E Chronaki; Roxana C Dumitru; Iveta Pudule; Silvina Santana; Henning Voss; Rolf Wynn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Shyam Ajay Gokani; Georgina Kerry; Ekta Sharma; Javier Ash; Alexander Kamiar Zargaran; Dara Shalini Rasasingam; Aaina Mittal Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Melanie Sharman; Martin Hensher; Stephen Wilkinson; Danielle Williams; Andrew Palmer; Alison Venn; Douglas Ezzy Journal: Health Expect Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Monika Jezierska-Kazberuk; Michał Wysocki; Michał Pędziwiatr; Magdalena Pisarska; Piotr Małczak; Artur Kacprzyk; Andrzej Budzyński Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 1.195