Literature DB >> 24072743

Pregnancy e-health: a multicenter Italian cross-sectional study on Internet use and decision-making among pregnant women.

Fabrizio Bert1, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Silvio Brusaferro, Elisabetta De Vito, Chiara de Waure, Giuseppe La Torre, Lamberto Manzoli, Gabriele Messina, Tullia Todros, Maria Valeria Torregrossa, Roberta Siliquini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of pregnancy e-health seekers in a large Italian sample; to explore the factors influencing the choices of the childbearing women regarding their lifestyles after internet consultation; and finally to investigate potential differences between primiparous and multiparous women in internet use to find information about pregnancy.
METHODS: A multicentre survey was carried out in seven Italian cities. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire administered in waiting rooms of outpatient departments by medical doctors. Respondents were questioned about their sociodemographic status, their use of the internet to seek pregnancy information and their consequent choices to modify their lifestyles. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Almost all women were pregnancy e-health seekers (95%), including those who also received information from healthcare professionals. Indeed, the main reason for searching the web was the need of further knowledge on pregnancy-related topic, over and beyond other key advantages of the net such as anonymity, simplicity and rapidity. A higher likelihood of changing lifestyle after pregnancy e-health was observed among the women who searched institutional websites; declared more confidence in the information retrieved; participated into pregnancy-centred forum online; and were residents in Italy.
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the likelihood for women of both finding erroneous information or misinterpreting correct ones, healthcare professionals should commit to fill the information gap and guide pregnant women in the online searches. Also, future studies are strongly needed to analyse the quality and accuracy of health information found on the web.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynaecology; Health Promotion; Maternal Health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072743     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  48 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of e-technologies in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Lau; Tha P Htun; Wai S W Tam; Piyanee Klainin-Yobas
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The web-surfing bariatic patient: the role of the internet in the decision-making process.

Authors:  Luca Paolino; Laurent Genser; Sylvie Fritsch; Nicola De' Angelis; Daniel Azoulay; Andrea Lazzati
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayşe Taştekin Ouyaba; Selma İnfal Kesim
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Communication Technology Use and Preferences for Pregnant Women and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Megan Shroder; Shilo H Anders; Marian Dorst; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Impact of a Mobile Application for Tracking Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy (NVP) on NVP Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Decisional Conflict Regarding NVP Treatments: MinSafeStart Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elin Ngo; Maria Bich-Thuy Truong; Hedvig Nordeng; David Wright
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.947

6.  Patterns of Internet Use by Pregnant Women, and Reliability of Pregnancy-Related Searches.

Authors:  Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Scarlett Karakash; Jeremy Weedon; Howard Minkoff
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bert; Marika Giacometti; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.

Authors:  Eleanor M Birch; Karolina Leziak; Jenise Jackson; Emma Dahl; Charlotte M Niznik; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-04-07

9.  A questioned authority meets well-informed pregnant women--a qualitative study examining how midwives perceive their role in dietary counselling.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Wennberg; Åsa Hörnsten; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Community Priority Index: Utility, Applicability and Validation for Priority Setting in Community-Based Participatory Research.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Abraham A Salinas-Miranda; Wei Wang; DeAnne Turner; Estrellita Lo Berry; Roger Zoorob
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2015-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.