Literature DB >> 29785493

Mindset and Communication Barriers in the Diffusion of Bariatric Surgery.

Daniel Gero1, Bors Hulesch2, Marco Bueter3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cumulating evidence is available to demonstrate the efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in achieving weight loss and optimizing comorbidities. However, currently, only a minority of eligible patients approaches bariatric centers. The underuse of BS can no longer be explained by the lack of evidence supporting its beneficial outcomes along with its favorable safety-profile, rather, by the supporting infrastructure, insurance coverage, and mindset of society, including potential patients and allied healthcare professionals. As a framework to approach mindset barriers in the diffusion of BS, we used the Rogers' levels of the innovation adoption process: (1) knowledge, (2) persuasion, (3) decision, (4) implementation, and (5) confirmation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Knowledge: people tend to believe that obesity is a result of lack of willpower and they have difficulties in differentiating BS from cosmetic surgery. Eligible patients often do not assess themselves as being morbidly obese and are unaware that they would qualify for BS. Persuasion: majority of BS candidates search health information online, with the aim of getting information about surgical techniques and other patients' experiences. Decision: metabolically more compromised patients are more likely to opt for BS. IMPLEMENTATION: general practitioners who already referred patients for BS seem to be more confident to refer again, to tackle obesity and manage postoperative follow-up. Confirmation: postbariatric patients seem to be more self-confident and more productive at work; however, their stigmatization might prevail related to the way they have achieved weight loss. Dissemination of balanced and corroborative information seems to be the main instrument to combat mindset barriers. The integration of general practitioners under the umbrella of bariatric centers has a great potential to increase referrals. Social media may represent a helpful tool to be used by medical professionals and patient-role models to improve confident decision-making of bariatric candidates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Communication; Mindset; Obesity; Online resource; Social media; Stigma; Weight bias

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785493     DOI: 10.1007/s11883-018-0738-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep        ISSN: 1523-3804            Impact factor:   5.113


  55 in total

1.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason.

Authors:  R S LEDLEY; L B LUSTED
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Changes in Attitudes Towards Bariatric Surgery After 5 Years in the German General Public.

Authors:  Franziska Ulrike Christine Else Jung; A Dietrich; C Stroh; S G Riedel-Heller; C Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The effect of an online referral system on referrals to bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Sama Anvari; Ruth Breau; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong; Scott Gmora
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander B. Stone; Christina T. Yuan; Michael A. Rosen; Michael C. Grant; Lauren E. Benishek; Elizabeth Hanahan; Lisa H. Lubomski; Clifford Ko; Elizabeth C. Wick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Patient preferences and bariatric surgery procedure selection; the need for shared decision-making.

Authors:  Andrew L Weinstein; Bryan J Marascalchi; Matthew A Spiegel; John K Saunders; Angela Fagerlin; Manish Parikh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Sleep apnoea in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
.

Authors:  Philip Rask Lage-Hansen; Jesper Holm; Jeppe Gram; Knud Larsen
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.240

7.  Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Bianca B Afonso; Raul Rosenthal; Ka Ming Li; Jorge Zapatier; Samuel Szomstein
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Primary care physician decision making regarding severe obesity treatment and bariatric surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Sally A Jolles; Caprice C Greenberg; Margaret L Schwarze; Nasia Safdar; Megan A McVay; Jeffrey C Whittle; Matthew L Maciejewski; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Stigma and Knowledge as Determinants of Recommendation and Referral Behavior of General Practitioners and Internists.

Authors:  Franziska U C E Jung; Claudia Luck-Sikorski; Hans-Helmut König; Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Weight loss after bariatric surgery in obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Felipe E Pedroso; Federico Angriman; Atsushi Endo; Hormuzdiyar Dasenbrock; Alessandra Storino; Ricardo Castillo; Ammara A Watkins; Manuel Castillo-Angeles; Julie E Goodman; Jeffrey L Zitsman
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.734

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Integrated Care Model of Adiposity-Related Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Thierry H Le Jemtel; Rohan Samson; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Online survey on factors influencing patients' motivation to undergo bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Jeannette Widmer; Daniel Gero; Barbara Sommerhalder; Daniela Alceste; Ivana Raguz; Michele Serra; René Vonlanthen; Marco Bueter; Andreas Thalheimer
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.