Literature DB >> 21848077

Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.

Eva Reinisch1, Alexandra Jesse, James M McQueen.   

Abstract

Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables' absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment Ia) or not (Experiment Ib). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than noninitial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21848077     DOI: 10.1177/0023830910397489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  9 in total

1.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Recognition memory for foreign language lexical stress.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

3.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Laura C Dilley; J Devin McAuley; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  New tests of the distal speech rate effect: examining cross-linguistic generalization.

Authors:  Laura C Dilley; Tuuli H Morrill; Elina Banzina
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

6.  Phoneme-free prosodic representations are involved in pre-lexical and lexical neurobiological mechanisms underlying spoken word processing.

Authors:  Ulrike Schild; Angelika B C Becker; Claudia K Friedrich
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Seeking Temporal Predictability in Speech: Comparing Statistical Approaches on 18 World Languages.

Authors:  Yannick Jadoul; Andrea Ravignani; Bill Thompson; Piera Filippi; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Matthias J Sjerps; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.