Literature DB >> 25620941

Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions.

Anthea G Blunden1, Tony Wang1, David W Griffiths1, Daniel R Little1.   

Abstract

A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models, demonstrated that integral dimensions are pooled into a single coactive processing channel, in contrast to separable dimensions, which are processed in multiple, independent processing channels. This paper examines the claim that arbitrary dimensions created by factorially morphing four faces are processed in an integral manner. In two experiments, 16 participants completed a categorization task in which either upright or inverted morph stimuli were classified in a speeded fashion. Analyses focused on contrasting different assumptions about the psychological representation of the stimuli, perceptual and decisional separability, and the processing architecture. We report consistent individual differences which demonstrate a mixture of some observers who demonstrate coactive processing with other observers who process the dimensions in a parallel self-terminating manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  categorization; coactivation; computational modeling; holistic processing; integrality; reaction time; separability; serial vs. parallel

Year:  2015        PMID: 25620941      PMCID: PMC4288243          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  49 in total

1.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization.

Authors:  K Lamberts
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  INFORMATION REDUCTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF SEQUENTIAL TASKS.

Authors:  M I POSNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications.

Authors:  R N SHEPARD; J J CHANG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-01

4.  RTbox: a device for highly accurate response time measurements.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Zhen Liang; Mario Kleiner; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

5.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Christopher Donkin; Mario Fific
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The structure of integral dimensions: contrasting topological and Cartesian representations.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  How category learning affects object representations: not all morphspaces stretch alike.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Isabel Gauthier; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Katherine Heller; Joseph L Austerweil; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal how categorization training changes the encoding of face identity.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Karla Escobar; Jefferson Salan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.