Literature DB >> 2190288

Latent class analysis of diagnostic agreement.

J S Uebersax1, W M Grove.   

Abstract

We describe methods based on latent class analysis for analysis and interpretation of agreement on dichotomous diagnostic ratings. This approach formulates agreement in terms of parameters directly related to diagnostic accuracy and leads to many practical applications, such as estimation of the accuracy of individual ratings and the extent to which accuracy may improve with multiple opinions. We describe refinements in the estimation of parameters for varying panel designs, and apply latent class methods successfully to examples of medical agreement data that include data previously found to be poorly fitted by two-class models. Latent class techniques provide a powerful and flexible set of tools to analyse diagnostic agreement and one should consider them routinely in the analysis of such data.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2190288     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780090509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Testing measurement reliability in older populations: methods for informed discrimination in instrument selection and application.

Authors:  Peter H Van Ness; Virginia R Towle; Manisha Juthani-Mehta
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2007-12-18

2.  Effect Size, Statistical Power and Sample Size Requirements for the Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Test in Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Stephanie T Lanza; Xianming Tan
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.125

3.  The Psychometric Latent Agreement Model (PLAM) for Discrete Latent Variables Measured by Multiple Items.

Authors:  Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Organ Res Methods       Date:  2011-01

4.  Improving the reliability of diagnostic tests in population-based agreement studies.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of several Trypanosoma cruzi antibody assays in blood donors in Argentina.

Authors:  Mirta C Remesar; Cecilia Gamba; Ivana F Colaianni; Mónica Puppo; Paula A Sartor; Edward L Murphy; Torsten B Neilands; María A Ridolfi; M Susana Leguizamón; Silvina Kuperman; Ana E Del Pozo
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  A modified Latent Class Model assessment of human papillomavirus-based screening tests for cervical lesions in women with atypical glandular cells: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Randy L Carter; Le Kang; Kathleen M Darcy; James Kauderer; Shu-Yuan Liao; William H Rodgers; Joan L Walker; Heather A Lankes; S Terence Dunn; Eric J Stanbridge
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  How we determined the most reliable solid medium for studying treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Charles M Heilig; Pei-Jean I Feng; Moses L Joloba; John L Johnson; Karen Morgan; Phineas Gitta; W Henry Boom; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Kathleen D Eisenach; Lorna Bozeman; Stefan V Goldberg
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.131

8.  Reliability of the peer-review process for adverse event rating.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Monica Taljaard; Carol Bennett; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual inspection with acetic acid as a cervical cancer test: accuracy validated using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Lynne Gaffikin; John A McGrath; Marc Arbyn; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Assessing agreement between multiple raters with missing rating information, applied to breast cancer tumour grading.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; Andrew G Lynch; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Rudolf Hanka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.