Literature DB >> 25620817

Accurate Critical Stress Intensity Factor Griffith Crack Theory Measurements by Numerical Techniques.

Richard C Petersen1.   

Abstract

Critical stress intensity factor (KIc) has been an approximation for fracture toughness using only load-cell measurements. However, artificial man-made cracks several orders of magnitude longer and wider than natural flaws have required a correction factor term (Y) that can be up to about 3 times the recorded experimental value [1-3]. In fact, over 30 years ago a National Academy of Sciences advisory board stated that empirical KIc testing was of serious concern and further requested that an accurate bulk fracture toughness method be found [4]. Now that fracture toughness can be calculated accurately by numerical integration from the load/deflection curve as resilience, work of fracture (WOF) and strain energy release (SIc) [5, 6], KIc appears to be unnecessary. However, the large body of previous KIc experimental test results found in the literature offer the opportunity for continued meta analysis with other more practical and accurate fracture toughness results using energy methods and numerical integration. Therefore, KIc is derived from the classical Griffith Crack Theory [6] to include SIc as a more accurate term for strain energy release rate (𝒢Ic), along with crack surface energy (γ), crack length (a), modulus (E), applied stress (σ), Y, crack-tip plastic zone defect region (rp) and yield strength (σys) that can all be determined from load and deflection data. Polymer matrix discontinuous quartz fiber-reinforced composites to accentuate toughness differences were prepared for flexural mechanical testing comprising of 3 mm fibers at different volume percentages from 0-54.0 vol% and at 28.2 vol% with different fiber lengths from 0.0-6.0 mm. Results provided a new correction factor and regression analyses between several numerical integration fracture toughness test methods to support KIc results. Further, bulk KIc accurate experimental values are compared with empirical test results found in literature. Also, several fracture toughness mechanisms are discussed especially for fiber-reinforced composites.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25620817      PMCID: PMC4302413     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sampe J        ISSN: 0091-1062            Impact factor:   0.182


  16 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading.

Authors:  J L Ferracane; J R Condon
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Mechanical performance and in vivo tests of an acrylic bone cement filled with bioactive sepia officinalis cuttlebone.

Authors:  S García-Enriquez; H E R Guadarrama; I Reyes-González; E Mendizábal; C F Jasso-Gastinel; B García-Enriquez; D Rembao-Bojórquez; C Pane-Pianese
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.517

3.  Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites.

Authors:  M Miyazaki; Y Oshida; B K Moore; H Onose
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Improved mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement with short titanium fiber reinforcement.

Authors:  S P Kotha; C Li; P McGinn; S R Schmid; J J Mason
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite.

Authors:  Janet B Quinn; George D Quinn
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  A procedure and criterion for bone cement fracture toughness tests.

Authors:  L Guandalini; M Baleani; M Viceconti
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael D Ries; Ernest Young; Laila Al-Marashi; Philip Goldstein; Alexander Hetherington; Timothy Petrie; Lisa Pruitt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites.

Authors:  Esteban D Bonilla; Mahrokh Yashar; Angelo A Caputo
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.

Authors:  Shiva Kotha; Chaodi Li; Steven Schmid; James Mason
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Influence of two changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on its handling, thermal, physical, and mechanical properties.

Authors:  G Lewis; J Xu; S Madigan; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.727

View more
  6 in total

1.  Advancing Discontinuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites above Critical Length for Replacing Current Dental Composites and Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2017-02

2.  3D-WOVEN FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE FOR CAD/CAM DENTAL APPLICATION.

Authors:  Richard Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu
Journal:  Sampe J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.182

3.  Mechanical Properties Comparing Composite Fiber Length to Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu
Journal:  J Compos       Date:  2016

4.  Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  EC Dent Sci       Date:  2017-05-02

5.  Computational conformational antimicrobial analysis developing mechanomolecular theory for polymer biomaterials in materials science and engineering.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng       Date:  2014-03

6.  An Advanced Fiber-Reinforced Composite Solution for Gingival Inflammation and Bone Loss Related to Restorative Crowns.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu; Michael S Reddy
Journal:  EC Dent Sci       Date:  2020-01-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.