Literature DB >> 17483892

Influence of two changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on its handling, thermal, physical, and mechanical properties.

G Lewis1, J Xu, S Madigan, M R Towler.   

Abstract

This study is a contribution to the growing body of work on the influence of changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on various properties of the curing and cured material. The focus is on one commercially-available acrylic bone cement brand, Surgical Simplex P, and three variants of it and a series of properties, namely, setting time, maximum exotherm temperature, activation energy and frequency factor for the polymerization reaction, diffusion coefficient for the uptake of phosphate buffered saline, at 37 degrees C, ultimate compressive strength (UCS), plane-strain fracture toughness, fatigue life (under fully-reversed tension-compression stress), hardness (H) and elastic modulus (both determined using quasi-static nanoindentation), and the variation of the storage and loss moduli with frequency of the applied force in a dynamic nanoindentation test. It was found that (a) a 68% reduction in the volume of the activator, N,N dimethyl-4-toluidine, relative to the total volume of the liquid monomer (the amounts of all the constituents in the powder and of the hydroquinone in the liquid monomer remaining unchanged) led to, for example, a significant decrease in the rate of the polymerization reaction, at 37 degrees C (c') and a significant increase in H; and (b) the elimination of the pre-polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) beads in the powder (the amounts of all the other powder constituents and those of the liquid monomer remaining unchanged) led to, for example, a significant drop in c' and a significant increase in UCS. Thus, these findings suggest a strategy for optimizing the composition of an acrylic bone cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17483892     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3042-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   4.727


  24 in total

1.  Slow crack growth in acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  P W Beaumont; R J Young
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-09

2.  Evaluation of an accelerated aging medium for acrylic bone cement based on analysis of nanoindentation measurements on laboratory-prepared and retrieved specimens.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis; Jie Xu; Nicholas Dunne; Catherine Daly; John Orr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 3.  Regulatory perspective on characterization and testing of orthopedic bone cements.

Authors:  H W Demian; K McDermott
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  A novel high-viscosity, two-solution acrylic bone cement: effect of chemical composition on properties.

Authors:  J M Hasenwinkel; E P Lautenschlager; R L Wixson; J L Gilbert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-10

5.  Nanomechanical properties of self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate) as a function of processing temperature.

Authors:  Debra D Wright-Charlesworth; William J Peers; Ibrahim Miskioglu; Laura L Loo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Effect of initiation chemistry on the fracture toughness, fatigue strength, and residual monomer content of a novel high-viscosity, two-solution acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  Julie M Hasenwinkel; Eugene P Lautenschlager; Richard L Wixson; Jeremy L Gilbert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-03-05

7.  Optimisation of the composition of an acrylic bone cement: application to relative amounts of the initiator and the activator/co-initiator in Surgical Simplex P.

Authors:  S Madigan; M R Towler; G Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cement-bone composites.

Authors:  P J Buckley; J F Orr; I C Revie; S J Breusch; N J Dunne
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.617

9.  Tobramycin and gentamycin elution analysis between two in situ polymerizable orthopedic composites.

Authors:  M DiCicco; T Duong; A Chu; S A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Estimation of the minimum number of test specimens for fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis; Anupama Sadhasivini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  3 in total

1.  Optimisation of a two-liquid component pre-filled acrylic bone cement system: a design of experiments approach to optimise cement final properties.

Authors:  James Clements; Gavin Walker; Sreekanth Pentlavalli; Nicholas Dunne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Accurate Critical Stress Intensity Factor Griffith Crack Theory Measurements by Numerical Techniques.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  Sampe J       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.182

3.  Mechanical and cytotoxicity testing of acrylic bone cement embedded with microencapsulated 2-octyl cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Alice B W Brochu; Gregory A Evans; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.368

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.