PURPOSE: To determine which MR-arthrography findings are associated with positive hip joint distraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with MR arthrography of the hip using axial traction were included. Traction was applied during the MR examination with an 8 kg (females) or 10 kg (males) water bag, attached to the ankle over a deflection pulley. Fifty patients showing joint space distraction were compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 50 patients that did not show a joint distraction under axial traction. Two radiologists assessed the neck-shaft angle, lateral and anterior center-edge (CE) angles, CE angles in the transverse plane, extrusion index of the femoral head, acetabular depth, alpha angle, acetabular version, ligamentum teres, joint capsule and ligaments, iliopsoas tendon and the labrum. RESULTS: Mean joint space distraction in the study group was 0.9 ± 0.6 mm. Patients with positive joint space distraction had significantly higher neck-shaft angles (control group 131.6 ± 5.4°/study group 134.1 ± 6.1°, p < 0.05), smaller lateral CE angles (38.1 ± 5.9°/34.6 ± 7.2°, p < 0.05), smaller overall transverse CE angles (161.4 ± 9.9°/153.6 ± 9.6°, p < 0.001), smaller acetabular depth (4.1 ± 2.4 mm/5.8 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.01), higher alpha angles (53.5 ± 7.8°/59.2 ± 10.1°, p < 0.01) and a thicker ligamentum teres (4.7 ± 1.4 mm/5.4 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.05). The other parameters revealed no significant differences. ICC values for interobserver agreement were 0.71-0.95 and kappa values 0.43-0.92. CONCLUSION: Increased neck-shaft angles, small CE angles, small acetabular depth, higher alpha angles and a thick ligamentum teres are associated with positive joint distraction.
PURPOSE: To determine which MR-arthrography findings are associated with positive hip joint distraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with MR arthrography of the hip using axial traction were included. Traction was applied during the MR examination with an 8 kg (females) or 10 kg (males) water bag, attached to the ankle over a deflection pulley. Fifty patients showing joint space distraction were compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 50 patients that did not show a joint distraction under axial traction. Two radiologists assessed the neck-shaft angle, lateral and anterior center-edge (CE) angles, CE angles in the transverse plane, extrusion index of the femoral head, acetabular depth, alpha angle, acetabular version, ligamentum teres, joint capsule and ligaments, iliopsoas tendon and the labrum. RESULTS: Mean joint space distraction in the study group was 0.9 ± 0.6 mm. Patients with positive joint space distraction had significantly higher neck-shaft angles (control group 131.6 ± 5.4°/study group 134.1 ± 6.1°, p < 0.05), smaller lateral CE angles (38.1 ± 5.9°/34.6 ± 7.2°, p < 0.05), smaller overall transverse CE angles (161.4 ± 9.9°/153.6 ± 9.6°, p < 0.001), smaller acetabular depth (4.1 ± 2.4 mm/5.8 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.01), higher alpha angles (53.5 ± 7.8°/59.2 ± 10.1°, p < 0.01) and a thicker ligamentum teres (4.7 ± 1.4 mm/5.4 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.05). The other parameters revealed no significant differences. ICC values for interobserver agreement were 0.71-0.95 and kappa values 0.43-0.92. CONCLUSION: Increased neck-shaft angles, small CE angles, small acetabular depth, higher alpha angles and a thick ligamentum teres are associated with positive joint distraction.
Authors: Felipe V Wagner; José R Negrão; Juliana Campos; Samuel R Ward; Parviz Haghighi; Debra J Trudell; Donald Resnick Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Casey A Myers; Bradley C Register; Pisit Lertwanich; Leandro Ejnisman; W Wes Pennington; J Erik Giphart; Robert F LaPrade; Marc J Philippon Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Eva Llopis; Luis Cerezal; Ara Kassarjian; Victoria Higueras; Ernesto Fernandez Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Luis Cerezal; Luis Pérez Carro; Javier Llorca; Moisés Fernández-Hernando; Eva Llopis; Juan Antonio Montero; Ana Canga Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Rebecca M Woodward; Renuka M Vesey; Catherine J Bacon; Steve G White; Matthew J Brick; Donna G Blankenbaker Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: George Konstantinidis; Michael Mitchell; Gordon Boyd; Catherine Coady; Swagata Ghosh; Ivan Wong Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Christoph E Albers; Nicholas Wambeek; Markus S Hanke; Florian Schmaranzer; Gareth H Prosser; Piers J Yates Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2016-11-10