Jolanda Dwarswaard1,2, Ellen J M Bakker1, AnneLoes van Staa1,2, Hennie R Boeije3. 1. Research Centre Innovations of Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Receiving adequate support seems to be crucial to the success of self-management. Although different empirical studies separately examined patients' preferences for self-management support (SMS), an overview is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this qualitative review was to identify patients' needs with respect to SMS and to explore by whom this support is preferably provided. SEARCH STRATEGY: Qualitative studies were identified from Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of science, PubMed publisher, Cochrane central, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles needed to meet all of the following criteria: (i) focuses on self-management, (ii) concerns adult patients with rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia), a variant of cancer or chronic kidney disease, (iii) explores support needs from the patients' perspective, (iv) uses qualitative methods and (v) published in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A thematic synthesis, developed by Thomas and Harden, was conducted of the 37 included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Chronic patients need instrumental support, psychosocial support and relational support from health-care professionals, family/friends and fellow patients to manage the chronic condition. Relational support is at the centre of the support needs and fuels all other types of support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients do not self-manage on their own. Patients expect health-care professionals to fulfil a comprehensive role. Support needs can be knitted together only when patients and professionals work together on the basis of collaborative partnership. Dynamics in support needs make it important to regularly assess patient needs.
BACKGROUND: Receiving adequate support seems to be crucial to the success of self-management. Although different empirical studies separately examined patients' preferences for self-management support (SMS), an overview is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this qualitative review was to identify patients' needs with respect to SMS and to explore by whom this support is preferably provided. SEARCH STRATEGY: Qualitative studies were identified from Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of science, PubMed publisher, Cochrane central, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles needed to meet all of the following criteria: (i) focuses on self-management, (ii) concerns adult patients with rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia), a variant of cancer or chronic kidney disease, (iii) explores support needs from the patients' perspective, (iv) uses qualitative methods and (v) published in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A thematic synthesis, developed by Thomas and Harden, was conducted of the 37 included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Chronic patients need instrumental support, psychosocial support and relational support from health-care professionals, family/friends and fellow patients to manage the chronic condition. Relational support is at the centre of the support needs and fuels all other types of support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:Patients do not self-manage on their own. Patients expect health-care professionals to fulfil a comprehensive role. Support needs can be knitted together only when patients and professionals work together on the basis of collaborative partnership. Dynamics in support needs make it important to regularly assess patient needs.
Authors: Anne Kennedy; Peter Bower; David Reeves; Tom Blakeman; Robert Bowen; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Martin Eden; Catherine Fullwood; Hannah Gaffney; Caroline Gardner; Victoria Lee; Rebecca Morris; Joanne Protheroe; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Sanders; Angela Swallow; David Thompson; Anne Rogers Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-13
Authors: Lindsay D Apps; Samantha L Harrison; Katy E Mitchell; Johanna E A Williams; Nicky Hudson; Sally J Singh Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2017-10-04
Authors: Johanna L van Gaalen; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Moira J Bakker; Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband; Jacob K Sont Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Siân Russell; Oladapo J Ogunbayo; James J Newham; Karen Heslop-Marshall; Paul Netts; Barbara Hanratty; Fiona Beyer; Eileen Kaner Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 2.871