Nicky Britten1. 1. Institute of Health Service Research, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. nicky.britten@pms.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the debate about the value of qualitative research in health care by discussing three key issues in relation to qualitative research on health communication. METHODS: As this paper does not report the results of a primary research study or a secondary analysis, no formal search strategy was employed to identify the cited papers; many other published papers would have made the same points just as well. RESULTS: The key issues are illustrated using a range of published studies drawn from the health care communication literature. The paper describes the range of outputs generated by qualitative research; illustrates different ways in which qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined; and shows the contribution of qualitative syntheses. CONCLUSIONS: Greater conceptual development and explanatory power may be achieved both by more ambitious primary studies and the conduct of more qualitative syntheses. The synthesis of qualitative research also offers the opportunity to build up a cumulative evidence base. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The further development of methods of qualitative synthesis will be enhanced if qualitative researchers place greater emphasis on explanation rather than description; cite each other's work more often and conduct more syntheses; and continue to contribute to mixed methods studies.
OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the debate about the value of qualitative research in health care by discussing three key issues in relation to qualitative research on health communication. METHODS: As this paper does not report the results of a primary research study or a secondary analysis, no formal search strategy was employed to identify the cited papers; many other published papers would have made the same points just as well. RESULTS: The key issues are illustrated using a range of published studies drawn from the health care communication literature. The paper describes the range of outputs generated by qualitative research; illustrates different ways in which qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined; and shows the contribution of qualitative syntheses. CONCLUSIONS: Greater conceptual development and explanatory power may be achieved both by more ambitious primary studies and the conduct of more qualitative syntheses. The synthesis of qualitative research also offers the opportunity to build up a cumulative evidence base. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The further development of methods of qualitative synthesis will be enhanced if qualitative researchers place greater emphasis on explanation rather than description; cite each other's work more often and conduct more syntheses; and continue to contribute to mixed methods studies.
Authors: Kim Willcox; Narelle Warren; Paul O'Brien; Wendy Brown; Peter Nottle; Jason Winnett; Ahmad Aly; Leah Brennan Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: E R Kurniawati; V G H Rutjens; N P A Vranken; T S R Delnoij; R Lorusso; I C C van der Horst; J G Maessen; P W Weerwind Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Helen R Whay; Amit K Dikshit; Jo Hockenhull; Richard M A Parker; Anindo Banerjee; Sue I Hughes; Joy C Pritchard; Christine E Reix Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anne Brédart; Alexia Marrel; Linda Abetz-Webb; Kathy Lasch; Catherine Acquadro Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 3.186