Literature DB >> 25619574

Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

Tara M Mastracci1, Matthew J Eagleton2, Yuki Kuramochi2, Shona Bathurst2, Katherine Wolski2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The practice of using fenestrated endografts to treat juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) has become more accepted, but long-term outcomes are still unknown. We report long-term survival, complications, and branch-related outcomes from a single-center experience.
METHODS: The study included consecutive patients enrolled prospectively into a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption classified as undergoing group IV TAAA or juxtarenal aneurysm repair by the treating surgeon using fenestrated endografts. Device morphology was used to subclassify this group of patients. Long-term survival and a composite outcome of secondary intervention, branch occlusion, stent migration, endoleak, aneurysm growth, or spinal cord injury were calculated. Descriptive analysis of branch-related outcomes and need for any reintervention was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of mortality and the composite outcome was performed to determine associative risks.
RESULTS: Long-term survival for patients with juxtarenal and group IV TAAA aneurysms treated with fenestrated stent grafts was 20% at 8 years. Multivariate analysis showed long-term survival for this patient population was negatively associated with increasing age, congestive heart failure, cancer, and previous aneurysm repair. The risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in this group was 1.2% and of aortic-related mortality was 2%. The risk of a spinal event increased with coverage above the celiac artery (52 mm of coverage above the celiac artery in patients with SCI vs 33 mm without SCI; P = .099). More complex device configurations were more likely to require an increased rate of reinterventions, and patients with celiac fenestrations were more likely to experience celiac occlusion over time (3.5% vs 0.5%; P = .019). However, less complex designs were complicated by an increased risk of type I endoleak over time (10.4% for renal fenestrations only vs 1.9% for others; P < .01). As experience evolved, there was a trend to increase the number of fenestrations in devices treating the same anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of fenestrated devices to treat juxtarenal and group IV TAAA is safe and effective in long-term follow-up. Mortality in this patient population is largely not aortic-related. Devices designed for fenestrated repair of juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms within a physician sponsored investigational device exemption have changed over time. Further research is needed to determine the best configuration to treat aneurysms requiring coverage proximal to the celiac artery.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25619574     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  16 in total

1.  The state of complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Thomas F X O'Donnell; Virendra I Patel; Sarah E Deery; Chun Li; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Patric Liang; Adam W Beck; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Type III endoleaks in complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Juliet Blakeslee-Carter; Adam W Beck; Emily L Spangler
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Perioperative neurologic outcomes of right versus left upper extremity access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Carla K Scott; Anna L Driessen; Marilisa Soto Gonzalez; Fatemeh Malekpour; Gerardo G Guardiola; Mirza S Baig; Melissa L Kirkwood; Carlos H Timaran
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 4.  A primer on infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Norman R Hertzer
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-23

5.  Invaginated Graft Insertion Anastomosis for a Type Ib Endoleak at the Supraceliac Aorta Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Suguru Kubota; Kosei Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  The Influence of Unfavorable Aortoiliac Anatomy on Short-Term Outcomes after Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Jae Hang Lee; Jin-Ho Choi; Eung-Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-05

7.  Exclusion of complex aortic aneurysm with chimney endovascular aortic repair is applicable in a minority of patients treated with fenestrated endografts.

Authors:  Miriam Kliewer; Elisabeth Pelanek-Völk; Markus Plimon; Fadi Taher; Afshin Assadian; Jürgen Falkensammer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Laparo- and thoracoscopic aortic aneurysm neck optimization and treatment of potential endoleaks type IA and II in a porcine model.

Authors:  Brian O Kloster; Lars Lund; Jes S Lindholt
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 9.  Complex endovascular treatment of intact aortic aneurysms: An analysis of health insurance claims data.

Authors:  C-A Behrendt; H C Rieß; T Schwaneberg; F Heidemann; N Tsilimparis; A-A Larena-Avellaneda; H Diener; T Kölbel; E S Debus
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2018-05-07

10.  Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR).

Authors:  Shaneel R Patel; Iain N Roy; Richard G McWilliams; John A Brennan; Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni; Simon K Neequaye; Jonathan D Smout; Robert K Fisher
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.