Literature DB >> 34740805

Type III endoleaks in complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Juliet Blakeslee-Carter1, Adam W Beck1, Emily L Spangler2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Type III endoleaks (T3ELs) following complex endovascular aneurysm repair (c-EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm have been historically difficult to study due to their relative rarity. Previous studies within standard infrarenal EVAR have found an association between T3ELs and decreased survival. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of T3ELs in a national multicenter cohort, identify potential procedural characteristics associated with T3EL development, and determine their impact on clinical outcomes in c-EVAR.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort review was conducted of elective c-EVAR for nonruptured aneurysms within the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) between January 2010 and March 2020. The VQI standards define c-EVAR as suprarenal or pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms repaired with any thoracoabdominal repairs, fenestrated/branched repairs, parallel stent repairs, custom manufactured devices, and physician-modified endografts. End points assessed were rates of T3ELs within c-EVAR, and impact of T3ELs on reintervention and survival. Index endoleaks were defined as endoleaks discovered during index hospitalization. Incident endoleaks were defined as new endoleaks, which were not present at index hospitalization, discovered at follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 4070 c-EVAR cases were identified between January 2010 and March 2020, of which 2656 (65.2%) had appropriate follow-up data. One-half of the cohort had a modified or custom graft (n = 2055/4070; 50.5%). Branches were employed in 3687 patients (90.5%), whereas fenestrations and chimney techniques were documented in 13% (n = 533) and 15.1% (n = 613), respectively. The rate of index T3ELs was 4.1% (n = 167), and the rate of incident T3ELs at follow-up was 0.04% (n = 1). Devices categorized as either custom or physician-modified were utilized more frequently in patients with index T3ELs (78.4%; n = 131/167) compared with patients without index T3ELs (49.2%; n = 1924/3903) (P < .001). Compared with those without T3ELs, the presence of index T3ELs was not statistically associated with increased aortic reinterventions or increased mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: T3ELs in c-EVAR remain relatively uncommon and are identified predominately at index hospitalization. Development of T3EL was associated with higher device modularity and modification, which suggests that as device technologies continue to advance and become more intricate, the occurrence of T3ELs may persist and continue to require evaluation. In this study, the presence of T3ELs did not appear to have a statistically significant relationship with aortic reinterventions or survival; however, these findings are not definitive due to low event rate numbers and high potential for type II errors. Amid the theoretical risk of device fatigue and degeneration, continued evaluations of large cohorts at extended follow-up intervals and diligent reporting remain paramount.
Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic Aneurysm; Complex EVAR; Endoleak

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34740805      PMCID: PMC8940611          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  27 in total

Review 1.  Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Elliot L Chaikof; Jan D Blankensteijn; Peter L Harris; Geoffrey H White; Christopher K Zarins; Victor M Bernhard; Jon S Matsumura; James May; Frank J Veith; Mark F Fillinger; Robert B Rutherford; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  The state of complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Thomas F X O'Donnell; Virendra I Patel; Sarah E Deery; Chun Li; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Patric Liang; Adam W Beck; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Patel; Michael J Sweeting; Janet T Powell; Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Resident and fellow experiences after the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Teviah Sachs; Marc Schermerhorn; Frank Pomposelli; Philip Cotterill; James O'Malley; Bruce Landon
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience.

Authors:  Corine van Marrewijk; Jacob Buth; Peter L Harris; Lars Norgren; André Nevelsteen; Michael G Wyatt
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Matthew J Eagleton; Yuki Kuramochi; Shona Bathurst; Katherine Wolski
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Brajesh K Lal; Wei Zhou; Ziyi Li; Tassos Kyriakides; Jon Matsumura; Frank A Lederle; Julie Freischlag
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair?

Authors:  Roy K Greenberg; Daniel Clair; Sunita Srivastava; Guru Bhandari; Adrian Turc; Jennifer Hampton; Matt Popa; Richard Green; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Endotension following endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Naoki Toya; Tetsuji Fujita; Yuji Kanaoka; Takao Ohki
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.239

10.  Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair.

Authors:  G H White; J May; R C Waugh; X Chaufour; W Yu
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1998-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.