Literature DB >> 33221882

Exclusion of complex aortic aneurysm with chimney endovascular aortic repair is applicable in a minority of patients treated with fenestrated endografts.

Miriam Kliewer1, Elisabeth Pelanek-Völk1, Markus Plimon1, Fadi Taher1, Afshin Assadian1, Jürgen Falkensammer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Medtronic Endurant II stent graft has recently received Conformité Européenne (CE) approval for the use in chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) for the treatment for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. The aim of this study was to assess the percentage of patients treated by fenestrated endovascular repair who would have been alternatively suitable for the treatment by the CE approved Medtronic ChEVAR.
METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography scans of 100 patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) between April 2013 and February 2017 were retrospectively assessed for the applicability of the ChEVAR technique according to the Medtronic instructions for use. Eligibility criteria included an aortic neck diameter of 19-30 mm, a minimum infrarenal neck length of 2 mm, a total proximal sealing zone of at least 15 mm, thrombus in the aortic neck in ˂25% of the circumference, and maximum aortic angulations of 60° in the infrarenal, 45° in the suprarenal segment and ˂45° above the superior mesenteric artery.
RESULTS: According to CE-approved inclusion criteria, 19 individuals (19%) would have been eligible for ChEVAR. In 81 patients, at least 1 measure was found outside instructions for use: (i) excluding factor was detected in 26 patients, (ii) incongruous measures in 28 patients and in 27 patients, 3-5 measures were outside the instructions for use. The most frequently identified excluding factor was an insufficient infrarenal neck at ˂2 mm length (n = 63; 63%).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with juxta- or pararenal aneurysm treated by FEVAR are in 19% of the cases alternatively suitable for the treatment by ChEVAR within CE-approved instructions for use. While ChEVAR is suitable in many emergency cases, FEVAR offers a broader applicability in an elective setting.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical suitability; Chimney EVAR; Complex aortic aneurysm; Fenestrated EVAR

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33221882      PMCID: PMC8906682          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  26 in total

1.  Technical aspects, current indications, and results of chimney grafts for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Raphael Coscas; Hicham Kobeiter; Pascal Desgranges; Jean-Pierre Becquemin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies: the PERICLES registry.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Donas; Jason T Lee; Mario Lachat; Giovanni Torsello; Frank J Veith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Multicentre Experience with the Chimney Technique for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in French University Hospitals.

Authors:  Joseph Touma; Caroline Caradu; Raphaelle Sylvestre; Nicla Settembre; Fabrice Schneider; Alessia Moia; Sabrina Ben Ahmed; Benoit Lebas; Julien Gaudric; Jean-Marc Alsac; Edouard Warein; Raphaël Coscas
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of chimney/snorkel versus fenestrated endovascular repair for high-risk patients with complex abdominal aortic pathologies.

Authors:  Gergana T Taneva; Konstantinos P Donas; Georgios A Pitoulias; Martin Austermann; Frank J Veith; Giovanni Torsello
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 1.888

5.  Outcome of Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated/Branched Stent-Grafts for Symptomatic Complex Aortic Pathologies or Contained Rupture.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Franziska Heidemann; Fiona Rohlffs; Holger Diener; Sabine Wipper; E Sebastian Debus; Tilo Kölbel
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Endovascular chimney technique versus open repair of juxtarenal and suprarenal aneurysms.

Authors:  Kevin J Bruen; Robert J Feezor; Michael J Daniels; Adam W Beck; W Anthony Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Comparison of outcomes with open, fenestrated, and chimney graft repair of juxtarenal aneurysms: are we ready for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Athanasios Katsargyris; Kyriakos Oikonomou; Chris Klonaris; Ingolf Töpel; Eric L G Verhoeven
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Open repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAA) remains a safe option in the era of fenestrated endografts.

Authors:  Andrew W Knott; Manju Kalra; Audra A Duncan; Nanette R Reed; Thomas C Bower; Tanya L Hoskin; Gustavo S Oderich; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Debate: Whether branched/fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair procedures are better than snorkels, chimneys, or periscopes in the treatment of most thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms.

Authors:  Adrien Hertault; Stéphan Haulon; Jason T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Graeme L Hickey; Joel Dunning; Burkhardt Seifert; Gottfried Sodeck; Matthew J Carr; Hans Ulrich Burger; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.