| Literature DB >> 25615728 |
Mahammad A Hannan1, Hussein A Hussein2, Saad Mutashar3, Salina A Samad4, Aini Hussain5.
Abstract
With the development of communication technologies, the use of wireless systems in biomedical implanted devices has become very useful. Bio-implantable devices are electronic devices which are used for treatment and monitoring brain implants, pacemakers, cochlear implants, retinal implants and so on. The inductive coupling link is used to transmit power and data between the primary and secondary sides of the biomedical implanted system, in which efficient power amplifier is very much needed to ensure the best data transmission rates and low power losses. However, the efficiency of the implanted devices depends on the circuit design, controller, load variation, changes of radio frequency coil's mutual displacement and coupling coefficients. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on various power amplifier classes and their characteristics, efficiency and controller techniques that have been used in bio-implants. The automatic frequency controller used in biomedical implants such as gate drive switching control, closed loop power control, voltage controlled oscillator, capacitor control and microcontroller frequency control have been explained. Most of these techniques keep the resonance frequency stable in transcutaneous power transfer between the external coil and the coil implanted inside the body. Detailed information including carrier frequency, power efficiency, coils displacement, power consumption, supplied voltage and CMOS chip for the controllers techniques are investigated and summarized in the provided tables. From the rigorous review, it is observed that the existing automatic frequency controller technologies are more or less can capable of performing well in the implant devices; however, the systems are still not up to the mark. Accordingly, current challenges and problems of the typical automatic frequency controller techniques for power amplifiers are illustrated, with a brief suggestions and discussion section concerning the progress of implanted device research in the future. This review will hopefully lead to increasing efforts towards the development of low powered, highly efficient, high data rate and reliable automatic frequency controllers for implanted devices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25615728 PMCID: PMC4299090 DOI: 10.3390/s141223843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.The biomedical transcutaneous system.
Figure 2.Transcutaneous power amplifier characteristics.
Figure 3.Power amplifier classes.
Figure 4.Conduction angle and input current signal for linearly-PA.
Figure 5.Class-F power amplifier.
Figure 6.Class-F PA voltage and current waveforms.
Figure 7.Class D power amplifier.
Figure 8.Class-D PA waveforms.
Figure 9.Class E power amplifier.
Figure 10.Class E waveforms.
Power amplifier's efficiency, advantage and disadvantage.
| A | 50% | RF applications | - | - | [ |
| B | 78.5% | RF applications | - | - | [ |
| AB | 70%–80% | RF applications | - | - | [ |
| C | 83%–90% | RF applications | - | - | [ |
| D | 80% | RF and bio-telemetry applications | Has a better response to the inductively coupled even in the case of frequency shifting | Requires two active devices, limited operating frequency and provide low power transmission efficiency | [ |
| E | 90%–95% | RF and bio-telemetry applications | Simple architecture and need only one active device, the frequency range is wide KHz-MHz and have high power transmission efficiency | Any shift in resonance frequency will decrease the output power transmission appreciably | [ |
| F | 90%–100% | RF and bio-telemetry applications | Need only one active device, the frequency range is wide KHz-MHz and have higher power transmission efficiency | Any shift in resonance frequency will decrease the output power transmission appreciably and need one more inductor | [ |
Figure 11.Automatic frequency control loop.
Figure 12.Gate drive switching control technique.
Gate drive switching control method used in transcutaneous amplifier control.
| Gate control | 0.760 | - | - | - | 9 | - | 1992 [ |
| Gate control | 20 | 0.35 | - | - | 10 | - | 1999 [ |
| Gate control | 4.5 | - | 1–10 mW | 74%–54% | 3 | 1–10 | 2007 [ |
| Gate control | 0.25–0.32 | - | - | - | 30–60 | 10–20 | 2009 [ |
| Gate control | 1 | - | - | 44.3%–83.4% | 6 | - | 2009 [ |
| Gate control | 0.155–0.168 | - | - | 82.1% | - | 16 | 2009 [ |
| Gate control | 1 | - | - | - | 6 | - | 2010 [ |
| Gate control | 0.3–0.4 | - | - | - | 30–45 | 10–20 | 2010 [ |
| Gate control | 1 | - | - | 67.6% | 6 | 40–69 | 2010 [ |
| Gate control | 0.120 | 0.8 | - | - | 5 | - | 2012 [ |
| Gate control | 13.56 | 0.5 | - | 77% | - | - | 2012 [ |
| Gate control | 0.083–0.175 | - | - | 66.2%–30% | 5 | 2–8 | 2012 [ |
| Gate control | 8 | 130 nm | - | - | 4–6 | - | 2013 [ |
| Gate control | 0.160 | - | - | 93.4% | - | 0–15 | 2013 [ |
| Gate control | 14 | 0.18 | - | 80% | 5–30 | - | 2014 [ |
Figure 13.Power control technique.
Power supply control method used in transcutaneous amplifier control.
| Power control | 1 | 0.16 | - | - | 15 | 4–15 | 2004 [ |
| Power control | 1 | 1.5 | - | 65.8%–36.3% | - | 7–15 | 2005 [ |
| Power control | 0.155 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 2007 [ |
| Power control | 4 | 0.15 | - | - | 2 | - | 2008 [ |
| Power control | - | 0.35 | - | 71.5% | 5 | - | 2011 [ |
| Power control | 8 | 0.18 | - | - | 3.3 | 10 | 2011 [ |
| Power control | 13.56 | - | 20 mW | 69% | - | - | 2011 [ |
| Power control | 1 | - | - | - | 5 | 0–11.8 | 2012 [ |
| Power control | 13.56 | 0.35 | - | 80% | - | - | 2012 [ |
| Power control | 8 | 0.35 | - | 63% | 3 | 10–20 | 2014 [ |
Figure 14.Voltage controlled oscillator.
VCO method used in transcutaneous amplifier control.
| VCO | 0.1225–0.1733 | - | - | - | - | 10–20 | 1998 [ |
| VCO | 10.8–13.2 | 0.35 | - | - | 3.3–4.5 | - | 2005 [ |
| VCO | 0.385–0.408 | - | - | 73% | 14 | 10–24 | 2006 [ |
| VCO | 13.56 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 70–80 | 2007 [ |
| VCO | 174–216 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 2011 [ |
| VCO | 0.950–1.2 | - | - | - | 2.3–5.5 | 6–20 | 2012 [ |
| VCO | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2012 [ |
Figure 15.A capacitor used to control resonance frequency.
Capacitance control method used in transcutaneous amplifier control.
| Capacitance control | 0.087 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 2005 [ |
| Capacitance control | 0.078 | - | - | 80% | 10 | 10 | 2008 [ |
| Capacitance control | 0.163–0.173 | - | - | - | 23.5 | 10–20 | 2009 [ |
| Capacitance control | 0.1 | - | - | - | 6 | - | 2011 [ |
| Capacitance control | 0.75 | - | - | - | - | 20–85 | 2014 [ |
Figure 16.A microcontroller used to control frequency shift.
Microcontroller used in transcutaneous amplifier control.
| microcontroller | 13.56 | - | 78 mW–1.1 W | - | 3.6 | 5–20 | 2010 [ |
| microcontroller | 8 | 0.18 | - | - | 36 | - | 2010 [ |
| microcontroller | 2.4 GHz | - | - | - | - | - | 2010 [ |
| microcontroller | 10 | 0.35 | 0.39 mW–0.745 mW | - | 3–4.5–15 | - | 2011 [ |
| microcontroller | 4 | 0.35 | - | - | - | - | 2011 [ |
| microcontroller | 6.78 | 0.35 | - | 86% | 10–14 | - | 2013 [ |
| microcontroller | 13.56 | 0.35 | - | 92.6% | - | - | 2014 [ |