Literature DB >> 25615246

A transobturator adjustable system for male incontinence: 30-month follow-up of a multicenter study.

Salomon Victor Romano1, Wilhelm Huebner2, Flavio Trigo Rocha3, Fernando Pires Vaz4, Valter Muller4, Fabio Nakamura5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report long-term results of the Argus T adjustable system for treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2007 to August 2008, 37 patients with PPI were included in a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of treatment with the Argus T adjustable system (Promedon, Argentina). Preoperative evaluation included urine culture, urethrocystoscopy, urodynamic testing, 24-h pad weight test (PWT) and quality of life questionnaires. Patients were stratified according to baseline degree of incontinence (mild-moderate or severe). Postoperative evaluation included immediate PWT, quality of life questionnaires and daily use of pads at 1, 12 and 30 months. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: One patient was lost to follow-up. At the 30-month follow-up, 24/31 patients (77%) were dry, 3/31 (10%) improved and 4/31 (13%) were failures. In particular, in the mild-moderate group, 8/8 (100%) patients were dry. In the severe group, 20/28 patients (71%) were dry, 3/28 (11%) improved and 5/28 (18%) were failures. Median visual analogue scale (VAS) scores dropped from 9 (4-10) to 0.5 (0-10) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form scores from (ICIQ-SF) 19 (12-21) to 1 (0-10). Retrograde leak point pressure increased from 18 (5-29) to 35 (22-45) cm H2O after intraoperative adjustment. Complications included immediate postoperative infection in 2/36 patients (6%) and transient inguinal and/or perineal pain in 22/36 patients (61%). Argus T has a long-term high success rate (86% cure + improvement at the 30-month follow-up). Good outcomes were achieved even in severe incontinence cases and maintained for over 30 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25615246     DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Mohannad A Awad; Isabel E Allen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Sandra Mühlstädt; Alexander Friedl; Nasreldin Mohammed; André Schumann; Karl Weigand; Felix Kawan; Christian Göllert; Christin Kahlert; Gerit Theil; Kersten Fischer; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Recent research on the role of urodynamic study in the diagnosis and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Jiang; Hann-Chorng Kuo
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Sung Jin Kim; Sung Tae Cho
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Adjustable sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laercio Antonio da Silva; Rogério Simonetti; Edina Mariko Koga da Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Effectiveness of surgical management with an adjustable sling versus an artificial urinary sphincter in patients with severe urinary postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Luis Guachetá Bomba; Ginna Marcela Ocampo Flórez; Fernando Echeverría García; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-09-29

Review 7.  Current interventional management of male stress urinary incontinence following urological procedures.

Authors:  Ireneusz Ostrowski; Emil Śledź; Janusz Ciechan; Tomasz Golabek; Jakub Bukowczan; Mikolaj Przydacz; Tomasz Wiatr; Klaudia Stangel-Wojcikiewicz; Piotr L Chłosta
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-09-26

8.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence - Is It the Best Option?

Authors:  Yun-Sok Ha; Eun Sang Yoo
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.