Literature DB >> 20446985

Dreams and nightmares: practical and ethical issues for patients and physicians using personal health records.

Matthew Wynia1, Kyle Dunn.   

Abstract

Electronic health records for patients, personal health records (PHRs), have become increasingly popular among policy makers and purchasers, but uptake among patients and physicians has been relatively slow. PHRs have varying uses that might make them more or less appealing to different stakeholders. The three core uses for PHRs - promoting communication, data use, and patient responsibility - each raises a set of potential practical and financial dilemmas. But some ethical concerns are also at play, some of which are rarely recognized as values-based barriers to the use of PHRs. Recognizing these ethical issues, and addressing them explicitly in PHR design and policy making, would help PHRs to achieve their promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20446985     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  18 in total

1.  Revolutionizing patient control of health information.

Authors:  David Chan; Michelle Howard; Lisa Dolovich; Gillian Bartlett; David Price
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  MyHealthAtVanderbilt: policies and procedures governing patient portal functionality.

Authors:  Chandra Y Osborn; S Trent Rosenbloom; Shane P Stenner; Shilo Anders; Sue Muse; Kevin B Johnson; Jim Jirjis; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Personal health records: is rapid adoption hindering interoperability?

Authors:  Jana Studeny; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-07-01

4.  Personal health records and hypertension control: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Peggy J Wagner; James Dias; Shalon Howard; Kristina W Kintziger; Matthew F Hudson; Yoon-Ho Seol; Pat Sodomka
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A qualitative study of how patients with type 2 diabetes use an electronic stand-alone personal health record.

Authors:  Kevin T Fuji; Amy A Abbott; Kimberly A Galt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Ethical, legal and social implications of incorporating personalized medicine into healthcare.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Susan Hinder; Katja Stramer; Tanja Bratan; Jill Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-16

8.  Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health.

Authors:  Jessica Taha; Sara J Czaja; Joseph Sharit; Daniel G Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-12

9.  The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.

Authors:  Kim M Nazi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Personal health records in the preclinical medical curriculum: modeling student responses in a simple educational environment utilizing Google Health.

Authors:  Dimokratis A Karamanlis; Panagiotis M Tzitzis; Charalampos A Bratsas; Panagiotis D Bamidis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.