| Literature DB >> 25614836 |
S A Maris1, D Quintanilla1, A Taetzsch2, A Picard3, J Letendre1, L Mahler3, I Lofgren2, F Xu1, M J Delmonico1.
Abstract
Obesity is a major health problem in the USA, especially in minority populations over the age of 60 years, and the aging process can cause adverse effects on physical function. Previous research has shown that Tai Chi, resistance training (RT), and diet result in overall health improvements. However, the combination of these specific interventions has yet to be translated to obese older women in an urban setting. The purpose of this study was to examine a combined intervention on the primary outcomes of physical function and body composition. Using a nonrandomized design, 26 obese women (65.2 ± 8.1 years) completed a 12-week intervention; participants were assigned to an intervention (EXD) group or a control (CON) group. The EXD group (n = 17) participated in Tai Chi, RT, and a dietary session. The CON group (n = 9) was asked to continue their normal lifestyle. Timed up and go (TUG) time was reduced by 0.64 ± 2.1 seconds (P = 0.04) in the EXD group while the CON group saw a borderline significant increase of 0.71 sec (P = 0.051). The combined intervention helped improve performance on TUG time, but there were no significant increases in other body composition or function measures.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25614836 PMCID: PMC4295588 DOI: 10.1155/2014/657851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Aging Res ISSN: 2090-2204
Figure 1Flow chart of participants throughout the study. The total analytical sample consisted of 26 participants, with 17 in the EXD group and 9 in the control group.
Baseline characteristics of the experimental group (EXD) and of the control group (CON).
| Characteristic | EXD group | CON group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)1 | 65.2 (8.1) | 65.6 (8.6) | 0.912 |
| Education2 | 0.132 | ||
| High school, GED, or less∗3 | 10 | 5 | |
| Associates/some college∗3 | 6 | 1 | |
| Bachelors or higher∗3 | 1 | 3 | |
| Weight (kg)1 | 97.9 (16.1) | 94.5 (12.0) | 0.578 |
| Height (cm)1 | 158.3 (6.6) | 159.8 (6.0) | 0.593 |
| BMI (kg/m2)1 | 38.8 (5.1) | 36.6 (3.4) | 0.241 |
| Waist circumference (cm)1 | 115.0 (8.9) | 106.8 (9.8) | 0.042 |
| Hip circumference (cm)1 | 124.3 (11.1) | 120.1 (6.2) | 0.305 |
| Waist to hip ratio1 | 0.93 (0.05) | 0.89 (0.07) | 0.167 |
| Body fat (%)1 | 49.8 (3.3) | 49.6 (2.9) | 0.888 |
| Race/ethnicity1 | |||
| Non-White∗1 | 13 (76) | 9 (100) | 0.263 |
| White∗1 | 4 (24) | 0 (0) | |
| Physical activity (kcal/week)3,1 | 7965.5 (5696.5) | 3100.4 (3657.5) | 0.038 |
| Diet quality score4,1 | 72.6 (21.4) | 76.4 (27.6) | 0.716 |
| At risk (<60)* | 6 (40) | 4 (44) | |
| Possible risk (60–75)* | 8 (47) | 4 (44) | |
| Not at risk (>75)* | 2 (13) | 1 (12) |
There were two baseline differences found in the physical activity kcal/week and in the waist circumference measures.
BMI: body mass index; %: percent.
All data are expressed as means with (standard deviations).
1Data analyzed using Student's t-test, 2data analyzed using Fisher's exact test, 3measured by Yale Physical Activity Survey, and 4measured by Dietary Screening Tool.
*Data are expressed as “n” and (percentage).
Figure 2Changes in the EXD and CON groups in TUG time change with the 12-week intervention. The EXD group improved TUG time by of 0.6 (2.1) sec with the 12-week intervention (P = 0.04) and the CON group saw a decline of 0.7 (SD = 0.9) after the 12 weeks (P = 0.05). *Significant changes within groups (P < 0.05). TUG: timed up and go. All data were analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values. All data are expressed as least squared means (standard error).
Baseline data and postintervention changes in physical and muscle function in the EXD and CON groups.
| Variable | EXD group | CON group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SPPB score (0–12) | |||
| Baseline | 8.4 (2.5) | 8.9 (2.9) | 0.628 |
| Postintervention | 9.1 (2.9) | 9.0 (2.6) | |
| Change | 0.8 (2.4) | 0.5 (1.9) | 0.810 |
| 4 m gait speed time (s) | |||
| Baseline | 5.41 (1.47) | 5.17 (1.20) | 0.681 |
| Postintervention | 5.35 (1.67) | 5.17 (1.26) | |
| Change | −0.06 (1.00) | −0.16 (0.37) | 0.781 |
| Five-chair stand (s) | |||
| Baseline | 10.75 (5.85) | 14.24 (3.87) | 0.122 |
| Postintervention | 11.08 (6.35) | 14.63 (5.18) | |
| Change | 0.33 (6.24) | −0.01 (2.98) | 0.624 |
| Flexibility score (cm) | |||
| Baseline | 9.6 (10.4) | 3.8 (3.9) | 0.124 |
| Postintervention | 6.4 (11.1) | 2.0 (6.5) | |
| Change | −2.3 (5.4) | −1.7 (7.0) | 0.930 |
| Knee ext. torque (kg-m) | |||
| Baseline | 6.74 (2.2) | 6.65 (1.10) | 0.907 |
| Postintervention | 7.67 (5.68) | 6.10 (2.21) | |
| Change | 0.92 (5.51) | −0.54 (2.54) | 0.477 |
| Grip strength (kg) | |||
| Baseline | 19.38 (6.90) | 18.93 (6.06) | 0.871 |
| Postintervention | 20.12 (6.57) | 19.13 (5.14) | |
| Change | 0.72 (4.09) | 0.95 (3.31) | 0.969 |
The EXD group improved flexibility by 2.3 (5.4) cm with the 12-week intervention (P = 0.07); however, no significant changes occurred with the 12-week intervention.
Ext.: Extension.
All data were analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values.
All data are expressed as least squared means (standard error).
Anthropometric changes with the 12-week intervention between the EXD and CON groups.
| Variable | EXD ( | CON ( | Between-group: |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 0.08 ± 0.69 | 0.34 ± 0.95 | 0.829 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.10 ± 0.79 | −0.34 ± 1.10 | 0.305 |
| % Body fat | −0.30 ± 0.54 | 0.26 ± 0.74 | 0.549 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 0.77 ± 1.56 | 3.19 ± 2.20 | 0.397 |
| Waist to hip ratio | 0.03 ± 0.01* | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.542 |
The EXD group saw an increase in waist to hip ratio measures after the 12 weeks, and no other significant changes occurred in body composition.
*Significant changes within groups (P < 0.05). Ext: extension; %: percentage.
All data were analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values.
All data are expressed as least squared means (standard error).