BACKGROUND: Muscle strength (MS) may be impaired in obese persons, and this impairment may be a consequence of both obesity and low physical fitness. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether MS differed between obese [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2 > 29], normal-weight (BMI = 24-29), and lean (BMI < 24) elderly subjects and compared the MS of sedentary and active subjects according to their BMI group. DESIGN: The study included 215 obese [ (+/- SD) age: 80.0 +/- 3.5 y; BMI: 31.9 +/- 2.6], 630 normal-weight (age: 80.2 +/- 3.7 y; BMI: 26.3 +/- 1.4), and 598 lean (age: 80.7 +/- 3.5 y; BMI: 21.6 +/- 1.8) women with good functional ability. A cross-sectional design was used. Anthropometric measures (weight, height); measures of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), isometric knee and elbow extension (by statergometer), and isometric handgrip strength (by dynamometer); and data on health status and self-reported recreational physical activity (RPA: walking, gymnastics, cycling, swimming, gardening) were collected. RESULTS: Absolute (unadjusted) MS was higher in obese than in lean women (P < 0.01), except for handgrip strength (P > 0.05). When adjusted for age, height, RPA, pain, depression, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass, MS did not differ significantly between obese, normal-weight, and lean subjects, except for knee extension (significant interaction effect with RPA; P = 0.01). With increasing BMI, lower limb strength did not change in the sedentary women but increased in active (> or = 1 h/wk in > or = 1 RPA for > or = 1 mo) women. All adjusted MS measures in active participants were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in their sedentary peers. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MS of elderly women is not associated with obesity but is higher in active subjects than in sedentary ones, especially in the lower limbs of obese subjects.
BACKGROUND: Muscle strength (MS) may be impaired in obesepersons, and this impairment may be a consequence of both obesity and low physical fitness. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether MS differed between obese [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2 > 29], normal-weight (BMI = 24-29), and lean (BMI < 24) elderly subjects and compared the MS of sedentary and active subjects according to their BMI group. DESIGN: The study included 215 obese [ (+/- SD) age: 80.0 +/- 3.5 y; BMI: 31.9 +/- 2.6], 630 normal-weight (age: 80.2 +/- 3.7 y; BMI: 26.3 +/- 1.4), and 598 lean (age: 80.7 +/- 3.5 y; BMI: 21.6 +/- 1.8) women with good functional ability. A cross-sectional design was used. Anthropometric measures (weight, height); measures of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), isometric knee and elbow extension (by statergometer), and isometric handgrip strength (by dynamometer); and data on health status and self-reported recreational physical activity (RPA: walking, gymnastics, cycling, swimming, gardening) were collected. RESULTS: Absolute (unadjusted) MS was higher in obese than in lean women (P < 0.01), except for handgrip strength (P > 0.05). When adjusted for age, height, RPA, pain, depression, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass, MS did not differ significantly between obese, normal-weight, and lean subjects, except for knee extension (significant interaction effect with RPA; P = 0.01). With increasing BMI, lower limb strength did not change in the sedentary women but increased in active (> or = 1 h/wk in > or = 1 RPA for > or = 1 mo) women. All adjusted MS measures in active participants were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in their sedentary peers. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MS of elderly women is not associated with obesity but is higher in active subjects than in sedentary ones, especially in the lower limbs of obese subjects.
Authors: Hannah G Lawman; Richard P Troiano; Frank M Perna; Chia-Yih Wang; Cheryl D Fryar; Cynthia L Ogden Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 5.043