| Literature DB >> 25614217 |
Krystal Teasley Hamorsky1, J Calvin Kouokam2, Jessica M Jurkiewicz3, Bailey Nelson3, Lauren J Moore3, Adam S Husk3, Hiroyuki Kajiura4, Kazuhito Fujiyama4, Nobuyuki Matoba2.
Abstract
Plant-based transient overexpression systems enable rapid and scalable production of subunit vaccines. Previously, we have shown that cholera toxin B subunit (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25614217 PMCID: PMC4303877 DOI: 10.1038/srep08003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparison of gCTB, N4S-CTB, and N4S-CTB-KDEL at 5 dpi.
(a) A Coomassie-stained non-denaturing SDS-PAGE resolving crude N. benthamiana leaf extracts. Numbers correspond to: 1. N4S-CTB-KDEL-expressing; 2. N4S-CTB-expressing; 3. gCTB–expressing; 4. empty vector-infiltrated; and 5. non-infiltrated plants, respectively, in biological triplicate (three independent plants). Arrowheads indicate N4S-CTB-KDEL and gCTB pentamers. (b) Quantification of CTB in leaf extracts at 5 dpi by GM1-ELISA. Numbers 1-3 correspond to N4S-CTB-KDEL, N4S-CTB and gCTB, respectively. Data are expressed as means ± SEM in biological triplicate. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test). (c) Photographs showing the phenotype of vector-inoculated plants at 5 dpi. Numbering is the same as in (a). Severe necrosis is evident with N4S-CTB and, to a lesser extent, N4S-CTB-KDEL, but not with gCTB.
Figure 2Relationship between stress response and N-glycosylation in CTB overexpression.
RT-qPCR analysis of stress genes: (a) BiP (b) PDI (c) bZIP60 (d) SKP1 (e) 26Sα (f) PR1a. RNA was extracted from leaf tissues at 2 dpi. Starting amounts of cDNA for each gene were normalized to that of 18S ribosomal RNA (reference gene). Data were plotted as fold increase to the average normalized value for non-infiltrated plants and are expressed as means ± SEM of biological replicates (n = 9). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns: not significant, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Numbers 1-3 correspond to empty vector-infiltrated, gCTB-expressing and N4S-CTB-expressing plants, respectively. (g) Left: Detection of ubiquitinated CTB in leaf extracts at 3 dpi by ELISA. Data were plotted as fold increase to the average value for empty vector infiltrated plants and are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3). **P < 0.01; unpaired two-tailed t-test. Numbers 1 and 2 correspond to gCTB- and N4S-CTB-expressing plants, respectively. Right: Schematic depicting ubiquitin ELISA.
Figure 3GM1-ganglioside-binding activity of gCTB.
(a) Binding affinity determination based on competitive GM1-ELISA. The assay was performed in triplicate. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of native CTB and gCTB were determined to be 1.8 and 2.4 nM, respectively. (b) Surface Plasmon Resonance. Each CTB protein was immobilized on a sensor chip, and GM1-ganglioside was used as the analyte. Representative sensorgrams obtained with gCTB (Top) and native CTB (Bottom) are shown. The capture level of gCTB was 210 RU and of native CTB was 175 RU. The colored curves represent various concentrations of GM1-ganglioside (10, 3.33, 1.11, 0.37, and 0.123 μg/ml from top to bottom), and the black lines are the 1:1 binding kinetics fit. The KD values for gCTB and CTB were determined to be 60.1 ± 1.7 and 51.4 ± 5.7 nM, respectively (means ± SD of triplicate).
Figure 4Thermal and acid stability of gCTB.
(a) Melting temperature (Tm) determination using DSF. CTB (dashed line, n = 3) and gCTB (solid line, n = 3) were analyzed. Tm values of CTB and gCTB were 74.2 and 70.9°C, respectively, as determined by the vertex of the first derivative of relative fluorescence unit (RFU) values. (b) pH stability analysis. CTB and gCTB were incubated in various pH buffers26, and GM1-bound CTB proteins were quantified by GM1-ELISA. The results were normalized to the average value of the corresponding CTB protein at pH 7.4 and expressed as % binding. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 3); * P < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed t-test.
pH stability of CTB and gCTB determined by DSFa
| pH | gCTB | CTB |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | 23.0 ± 0 | 40.4 ± 0 |
| 4.0 | 58.8 ± 2.5 | 66.7 ± 1.4 |
| 5.0 | 67.0 ± 0.7 | 77.3 ± 0.3 |
| 6.0 | 72.5 ± 1.0 | 80.6 ± 1.4 |
| 7.4 | 70.5 ± 0.8 | 73.9 ± 1.2 |
aProteins were diluted in appropriate pH buffers (see Experimental Procedures for details).
bTm were determined by the vertex of the first derivative of relative fluorescence unit values. The assay was performed in triplicate and Tm values expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 5Glycan profile of gCTB.
The chromatogram shows RP-HPLC separation of PA-labeled glycans isolated from gCTB. Glycan structures with >2% relative abundance are depicted at corresponding PA-glycan fractions. Symbols: circle (), mannose; square (), N-acetylglucosamine; pentagon (), β1,3-galactose; diamond (), fucose and triangle (), xylose.
N-glycan composition of gCTB expressed in N. benthamiana
| Structure | HPLC fraction | Relative amount (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oligomannosidic structure | Man7GlcNAc2 | 4-a | 0.6 | 3.5 |
| Man8GlcNAc2 | 2 | 1.3 | ||
| Man9GlcNAc2 | 4-b | 1.6 | ||
| fucose/xylose-linked structure | Man3Xyl1GlcNAc2 | 10-a | 14.7 | |
| GlcNAc-linked structure | GlcNAc1Man3GlcNAc2 | 9/17 | 6.2/33.1 | |
| GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2 | 15 | 12.5 | 51.8 | |
| Complex structure | GlcNAc1Man3Xyl1GlcNAc2 | 10-b/16 | 3.3/16.7 | |
| GlcNAc1Man3Fuc1Xyl1GlcNAc2 | 3 | 0.8 | 24 | |
| GlcNAc2Man3Xyl1GlcNAc2 | 14-a | 3.2 | ||
| β1,3-Gal-linked structure | Gal1GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2 | 14-b | 3.5 | 6.0 |
| Gal1GlcNAc2Man3Xyl1GlcNAc2 | 14-c | 2.5 | ||
aMan, mannose; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; Fuc, fucose; Xyl, xylose; and Gal, β1,3-galactose.
bFraction numbers are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. S2.
cThe relative amount of each glycan was calculated from the fluorescence intensity of PA fractions in SF-HPLC.
dTwo isomers for the terminal GlcNAc residue were identified.
Figure 6Oral immunogenicity of gCTB.
Anti-CTB antibody titers. C57bl/6 mice were orally immunized twice with PBS, gCTB, or CTB (3 μg). (a) Fecal anti-CTB SIgA, (b) Serum anti-CTB IgG and (c) Serum IgG subtype. Endpoint titers were analyzed 2 weeks after the second immunization. Horizontal bars show mean titers, whereas symbols represent titers of individual mice (for serum IgG) or pooled analysis (for fecal IgA; fecal samples of each group were pooled for analysis). There was no significant difference between total endpoint titers induced by CTB and gCTB (P > 0.05;2-tailed unpaired t-test).