Literature DB >> 23394563

Target product selection - where can Molecular Pharming make the difference?

Mathew J Paul1, Audrey Y H Teh, Richard M Twyman, Julian K-C Ma.   

Abstract

Four major developments have taken place in the world of Molecular Pharming recently. In the USA, the DARPA initiative challenged plant biotechnology companies to develop strategies for the large-scale manufacture of influenza vaccines, resulting in a successful Phase I clinical trial; in Europe the Pharma-Planta academic consortium gained regulatory approval for a plant-derived monoclonal antibody and completed a first-in-human phase I clinical trial; the Dutch pharmaceutical company Synthon acquired the assets of Biolex Therapeutics, an established Molecular Pharming company with several clinical candidates produced in their proprietary LEX system based on aquatic plants; and finally, the Israeli biotechnology company Protalix Biotherapeutics won FDA approval for the commercial release of a recombinant form of the enzyme glucocerebrosidase produced in carrot cells, the first plant biotechnology-derived biopharmaceutical in the world approved for the market. Commercial momentum is gathering pace with additional candidates now undergoing or awaiting approval for phase III clinical trials. Filling the product pipeline is vital to establish commercial sustainability, and the selection of appropriate target products for Molecular Pharming will be a critical factor. An interesting feature of the four stories outlined above is that they span the use of very different platform technologies addressing different types of molecules which aim to satisfy distinct market demands. In each case, Molecular Pharming was an economically and technically suitable approach, but this decisionmaking process is not necessarily straightforward. Although the various technologies available to Molecular Pharming are broad ranging and flexible, competing technologies are better established, so there needs to be a compelling reason to move into plants. It is most unlikely that plant biotechnology will be the answer for the whole biologics field. In this article, we discuss the current plant biotechnology approaches that appear to hold the greatest promise and in doing so attempt to define the product areas that are most likely to benefit from different Molecular Pharming technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23394563     DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319310003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  11 in total

1.  Plant species and organ influence the structure and subcellular localization of recombinant glycoproteins.

Authors:  Elsa Arcalis; Johannes Stadlmann; Thomas Rademacher; Sylvain Marcel; Markus Sack; Friedrich Altmann; Eva Stoger
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  N-glycosylation of cholera toxin B subunit in Nicotiana benthamiana: impacts on host stress response, production yield and vaccine potential.

Authors:  Krystal Teasley Hamorsky; J Calvin Kouokam; Jessica M Jurkiewicz; Bailey Nelson; Lauren J Moore; Adam S Husk; Hiroyuki Kajiura; Kazuhito Fujiyama; Nobuyuki Matoba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Putting the Spotlight Back on Plant Suspension Cultures.

Authors:  Rita B Santos; Rita Abranches; Rainer Fischer; Markus Sack; Tanja Holland
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Engineering the interactions between a plant-produced HIV antibody and human Fc receptors.

Authors:  Szymon Stelter; Mathew J Paul; Audrey Y-H Teh; Melanie Grandits; Friedrich Altmann; Jessica Vanier; Muriel Bardor; Alexandra Castilho; Rachel Louise Allen; Julian K-C Ma
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 5.  Comparative evaluation of recombinant protein production in different biofactories: the green perspective.

Authors:  Matilde Merlin; Elisa Gecchele; Stefano Capaldi; Mario Pezzotti; Linda Avesani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Glyco-engineering for biopharmaceutical production in moss bioreactors.

Authors:  Eva L Decker; Juliana Parsons; Ralf Reski
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  A Systematic Analysis of the Structures of Heterologously Expressed Proteins and Those from Their Native Hosts in the RCSB PDB Archive.

Authors:  Ren-Bin Zhou; Hui-Meng Lu; Jie Liu; Jian-Yu Shi; Jing Zhu; Qin-Qin Lu; Da-Chuan Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cloning and plant-based production of antibody MC10E7 for a lateral flow immunoassay to detect [4-arginine]microcystin in freshwater.

Authors:  Stanislav Melnik; Anna-Cathrine Neumann; Ryan Karongo; Sebastian Dirndorfer; Martin Stübler; Verena Ibl; Reinhard Niessner; Dietmar Knopp; Eva Stoger
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 13.263

Review 9.  Potential Applications of Plant Biotechnology against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Teresa Capell; Richard M Twyman; Victoria Armario-Najera; Julian K-C Ma; Stefan Schillberg; Paul Christou
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 18.313

10.  Co-expression of human calreticulin significantly improves the production of HIV gp140 and other viral glycoproteins in plants.

Authors:  Emmanuel Margolin; Youngjun J Oh; Matthew Verbeek; Jason Naude; Daniel Ponndorf; Yulia Alexandrovna Meshcheriakova; Hadrien Peyret; Michiel T van Diepen; Ros Chapman; Ann E Meyers; George Peter Lomonossoff; Nobuyuki Matoba; Anna-Lise Williamson; Edward P Rybicki
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 9.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.