| Literature DB >> 29441088 |
Sugata Roychowdhury1, Young J Oh1, Hiroyuki Kajiura2, Krystal T Hamorsky1,3, Kazuhito Fujiyama2, Nobuyuki Matoba1,4,5.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: N-glycosylation; Nicotiana benthamiana; high-mannose-type glycan; kifunensine; mannosylation; subunit vaccine
Year: 2018 PMID: 29441088 PMCID: PMC5797603 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Study design and conditions. (A) A flow chart for agroinfiltration and hydroponic kifunensine treatment of N. benthamiana. (B) Kifunensine treatment conditions. The α-mannosidase I inhibitor was added at different time intervals; at the time of hydroponic setup (Day 0), and then added every other day, i.e., Day 2 and then Day 4 at the dose indicated.
Figure 2Endoglycosidase digestion of gCTB. (A) A representative immunoblot showing gCTB treated with a mock control (uncut), Endo H or PNGase F upon 0, 1, 2, and 3 kif treatments. (B) Densitometric analyses to calculate the fraction of glycosylated band resistant to either of the enzymes. Band intensity was normalized by calculating the fraction of residual undigested glycosylated gCTB band remaining after overnight digestion with respective glycosidases over glycosylated band intensity of an undigested gCTB sample, both receiving similar doses of kifunensine treatment. (C) A representative immunoblot showing gCTB from 0, 1, 2, and 3 kif conditions probed with α-fucose and β-xylose antibodies. (D) The quantification of gCTBkif in N. benthamiana using GM1-ELISA from clarified extracts. Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests [*P < 0.05; ns, not significant (P > 0.05)].
Figure 3qRT-PCR analysis of ER stress related genes. (A–C) Total leaf RNA was isolated at 2 days post vector inoculation under no kifunensine treatment (Non), no kifunensine treatment with 0.3 mM ascorbic acids (Non + AA), 5 mM kinfunensine treatment (3 Kif) or under 5 mM kifunensine plus 0.3 mM ascorbic acids (3 Kif + AA). All groups have undergone the same procedural manipulations except for Kif or AA treatments. The expression levels of BiP (A), PDI (B), and bZIP60 (C) were quantified by qRT-PCR. The 18S rRNA was used for the normalization of cDNA amount. Values indicated as fold increase to the average normalized value for the Non group and are expressed as means ± SEM of biological replicates (n = 9). (D) Quantification of gCTB from Non, Non + AA, 3 kif and 3 kif + AA conditions in N. benthamiana leaf extract using GM1-ELISA (n = 9). (E–G) qRT-PCR analysis of BiP (E), PDI (F), and bZIP60 (G) of empty vector-inoculated plants. Plants were treated the same way as above, excluding the Non + AA conditions. Values indicated as fold increase to the average normalized value for the Non group and are expressed as means ± SEM of biological replicates (n = 9). Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests [*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant (P > 0.05)].
Figure 4N-linked glycan profile of HIV-1 gp120. Chromatogram showing MS analyses of RP-HPLC separated pyridylamino (PA)-labeled glycans isolated from different growth conditions along with sugar legends (HEK: HEK 293T cell line; gp120-HDEL: plant-produced recombinant gp120-HDEL).
Relative N-glycan composition of gp120 expressed in different growth conditions: HEK produced gp120, Nicotiana benthamiana produced gp120-HDEL and Nicotiana benthamiana produced gp120-HDEL + 3 Kif.
| Mannose-type structure | M3 | 0.5 | – | – |
| M4 | 1.1 | 1.8 | – | |
| M5 | 9.2 | 4.2 | 1.1 | |
| M6B | 4.6 | 7.2 | 8.9 | |
| M7A | 4.5 | 5.0 | 1.2 | |
| M7B | 1.0 | 11.9 | 1.8 | |
| M8A | 10.3 | 41.1 | 9.8 | |
| M8B | 0.9 | – | 1.4 | |
| M9 | 7.3 | 20.3 | 64.5 | |
| Glc-linked structure | GlcM6 | – | 1.0 | 7.8 |
| GlcM7 | – | – | 3.5 | |
| GlcNAc-linked structure | GNM3 | – | 4.7 | – |
| GNM3 | 3.2 | – | – | |
| GN2M3 | 4.9 | – | – | |
| GNM5 | 0.9 | – | – | |
| GN3M3 | 0.6 | – | – | |
| β 1,2-Xyl-linked structure | GNM3X | – | 2.8 | – |
| α 1,6-Fuc-linked structure | GNM3F | 4.4 | – | – |
| GNM3F | 1.3 | – | – | |
| GN2M3F | 18.0 | – | – | |
| GN3M3F | 7.0 | – | – | |
| GN4M3F | 1.9 | – | – | |
| β 1,4-Gal-linked structure | GalGN2M3 | 2.1 | – | – |
| GalGN2M3F | 9.8 | – | – | |
| GalGN3M3F | 2.8 | – | – | |
| GalGNM5 | 0.6 | – | – | |
| Gal2GN2M3F | 3.1 | – | – | |
| Total Mannose-type structure | 39.4 | 91.5 | 88.7 | |
| Total GlcNAc-linked structure | 9.6 | 4.7 | – | |
| Total Fuc-linked structure | 32.6 | – | – | |
| Total Gal-linked structure | 18.4 | – | – | |