Literature DB >> 28091834

Using Twitter to Assess the Public Response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines on Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose Chest CT.

Siddharth Khasnavis1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz2, Vinay Prabhu2.   

Abstract

To use Twitter to assess the immediate public response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 draft guidelines on lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT (LDCT). The number of tweets including the phrases "lung cancer screening," "lung CT," "chest CT," "low dose computed tomography," "low dose CT," or "LDCT" was recorded for 6 days before and after guidelines release. A systematic sample of 172 tweets from the week following release was coded for user type, tweet opinion, linked article source, and article opinion. Following guidelines' release, the number of daily tweets increased from 13 ± 8 to 311 ± 395. The 172 tweets in the week following release were tweeted by 166 unique users including: news organizations/online news gathering accounts (34.9%), general public (21.7%), physicians (12.0%, 6 radiologists), and businesses (11.4%). 23.3% of tweets provided opinion on the guidelines (50.0% favorable, 27.5% concerned toward screening). Most (91.3%) tweets contained links to a total of 46 unique articles, which were authored by lay press (41.3%), non-peer-reviewed medical press (32.6%), and hospital/medical practice websites (10.9%). Among these, 50.0% were favorable, citing mortality reduction (87.0%), published data supporting screening (50.0%), and early detection (43.5%), while 28.3% expressed concern, including false positives (58.9%) and radiation risk (39.1%). Twitter activity rose rapidly after the USPSTF draft guidelines on LDCT. Most users were non-physicians and frequently cited non-peer-reviewed articles. Users maintained an overall favorable view of screening, while expressing various concerns. Considerable opportunity exists for greater radiologist engagement in this online public dialog.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-dose CT; Lung cancer; Screening; Social media; Twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28091834      PMCID: PMC5422226          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9933-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Public Interest in Imaging-Based Cancer Screening Examinations in the United States: Analysis Using a Web-Based Search Tool.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Vinay Prabhu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.

Authors:  Linda B Squiers; Debra J Holden; Suzanne E Dolina; Annice E Kim; Carla M Bann; Jeanette M Renaud
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  US Preventive Services Task Force CT lung cancer screening recommendations: community awareness and perceptions.

Authors:  Michele Retrouvey; Zeal Patel; Sarah Shaves
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The Potential of Twitter as a Data Source for Patient Safety.

Authors:  Atul Nakhasi; Sarah G Bell; Ralph J Passarella; Michael J Paul; Mark Dredze; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Iaccarino; Jack Clark; Rendelle Bolton; Linda Kinsinger; Michael Kelley; Christopher G Slatore; David H Au; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-11

Review 7.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Deffebach; Miranda Pappas; Christina Baumann; Kathryn Artis; Jennifer Priest Mitchell; Bernadette Zakher; Rongwei Fu; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Stacy Loeb; John H Holmes; Heather T Gold; Herbert Lepor; David F Penson; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter.

Authors:  Jared B Hawkins; John S Brownstein; Gaurav Tuli; Tessa Runels; Katherine Broecker; Elaine O Nsoesie; David J McIver; Ronen Rozenblum; Adam Wright; Florence T Bourgeois; Felix Greaves
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Readiness of primary care clinicians to implement lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Lewis E Foxhall
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-24
View more
  4 in total

1.  Incorporating Digital Tools to Improve Clinical Trial Infrastructure: A White Paper From the Digital Engagement Committee of SWOG.

Authors:  Don S Dizon; Mina S Sedrak; Mark A Lewis; Elise Cook; Michael J Fisch; Jennifer R Klemp; Jonathan Sommers; AnneMarie Ciccarella; Julie Gralow; Wendy Lawton; Craig Nichols
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

2.  Evaluation of Parental Perspectives and Concerns About Pediatric Tonsillectomy in Social Media.

Authors:  Tai Kyung Hairston; Anne R Links; Vandra Harris; David E Tunkel; Jonathan Walsh; Mary Catherine Beach; Emily F Boss
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Role of social and non-social online media: how to properly leverage your internet presence for professional development and research.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Jessica T Lovett; Kamran Munawar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 4.  The use of social media as a tool for stakeholder engagement in health service design and quality improvement: A scoping review.

Authors:  Louisa Walsh; Nerida Hyett; Nicole Juniper; Chi Li; Sophie Rodier; Sophie Hill
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.