Literature DB >> 25611793

Simple measurements to place umbilical catheters using surface anatomy.

A O Gupta1, M R Peesay2, J Ramasethu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use external anatomical landmarks to determine a new method for the estimation of appropriate insertion length of umbilical catheters, suitable for newborn infants of varying birth weight (BW) and gestational age. STUDY
DESIGN: Neonates who had umbilical venous (UVC) or arterial (UAC) catheters placed soon after birth were included in the study. Catheters were placed using formulas derived by Shukla (1986) and/or Wright (2007), and adjusted to appropriate positions confirmed radiologically: UAC tip between T6-T10 vertebral bodies and UVC at the level of the diaphragm±0.5 cms. Final catheter length was compared with the length estimated by Shukla/Wright formulas and to four additional morphometric measurements: umbilicus to nipple (UN), umbilicus to midpoint of inter-mammary distance, umbilicus to xiphoid process and umbilicus to symphysis pubis (USp). RESULT: Of 216 infants, 32 were excluded; UVC was placed in 170 infants and UAC in 125 infants. Among the morphometric measurements, UN-1 cm ( UN distance minus 1 cm) provided the best estimate of accurate insertion length of UVC, (r=0.984, P<0.001) and estimated correct insertion length of 94% of UVCs compared with 57% accuracy with Shukla formula for all BW categories (P<0.001). Morphometric measurement UN-1+2 USp (UN distance minus 1 cm plus twice the distance from umbilicus to symphysis pubis) showed significantly better correlation with appropriate insertion length of UAC (r=0.985, P<0.001) and estimated correct insertion length of 92% of UACs in all infants as compared with 57% accuracy with Shukla formula (P<0.001), and the correct insertion length in 94% of very low BW infants as compared with 68% accuracy with Wright formula (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Simple and intuitive morphometric measurements UN and USp provide more accurate estimates of appropriate insertion lengths for umbilical catheters in infants with all BWs than commonly used BW-based formulas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25611793     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  14 in total

1.  Simple and accurate formula to estimate umbilical arterial catheter length of high placement.

Authors:  Suthida Sritipsukho; Paskorn Sritipsukho
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2007-09

Review 2.  Complications of vascular catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jayashree Ramasethu
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Revised formula to determine the insertion length of umbilical vein catheters.

Authors:  Gerdina H Verheij; Arjan B te Pas; Vivianne E H J Smits-Wintjens; Alexandr Šràmek; Frans J Walther; Enrico Lopriore
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Determination of umbilical catheter placement using anatomic landmarks.

Authors:  Payam Vali; Sarah E Fleming; Jae H Kim
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns.

Authors:  H Shukla; A Ferrara
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1986-08

6.  Localization of the umbilical catheter by post-mortem measurement.

Authors:  P M Dunn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Umbilical artery catheters in the newborn: effects of position of the catheter tip.

Authors:  K J Barrington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

8.  The umbilical arterial catheter: a formula for improved positioning in the very low birth weight infant.

Authors:  Ian M R Wright; Marilyn Owers; Mary Wagner
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Poor accuracy of methods currently used to determine umbilical catheter insertion length.

Authors:  Gerdina H Verheij; Arjan B Te Pas; Ruben S G M Witlox; Vivianne E H J Smits-Wintjens; Frans J Walther; Enrico Lopriore
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-05-10

10.  Determination of umbilical venous catheter tip position with radiograph.

Authors:  Adam B Hoellering; Pieter J Koorts; David W Cartwright; Mark W Davies
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.624

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reply to Ford and Hagan.

Authors:  J Ramasethu; S Desale; A Gupta; M Peesay
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Using surface anatomy measurements to place umbilical catheters.

Authors:  S L Ford; J L Hagan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Comparison of methods and formulas used in umbilical venous catheter placement.

Authors:  Mehmet Mutlu; Burcu Küçükalioğlu Parıltan; Yakup Aslan; İlker Eyüpoğlu; Şebnem Kader; Filiz Acar Aktürk
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Umbilical venous catheters placement evaluation on frontal radiogram: application of a simplified flow-chart for radiology residents.

Authors:  Sergio Salerno; Chiara Tudisca; Elena Murmura; Domenica Matranga; Giuseppe La Tona; Giuseppe Lo Re; Antonio Lo Casto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim Gibson; Rebecca Sharp; Amanda Ullman; Scott Morris; Tricia Kleidon; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Optimal Line and Tube Placement in Very Preterm Neonates: An Audit of Practice.

Authors:  Daragh Finn; Hannah Kinoshita; Vicki Livingstone; Eugene M Dempsey
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 7.  Umbilical Venous Catheter Update: A Narrative Review Including Ultrasound and Training.

Authors:  Vito D'Andrea; Giorgia Prontera; Serena Antonia Rubortone; Lucilla Pezza; Giovanni Pinna; Giovanni Barone; Mauro Pittiruti; Giovanni Vento
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.