Literature DB >> 24141654

Determination of umbilical venous catheter tip position with radiograph.

Adam B Hoellering1, Pieter J Koorts, David W Cartwright, Mark W Davies.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cardiac silhouette method with the vertebral body method in predicting the umbilical venous catheter tip position on ultrasound; to measure the length of the target zone for the umbilical venous catheter tip; and to determine the time taken for a neonatologist to ascertain position of the umbilical venous catheter tip with ultrasound.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Neonatal ICU. PATIENTS: Newborn infants with an umbilical venous catheter.
INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound scans to determine the umbilical venous catheter tip position were performed within an hour of corresponding anteroposterior chest-abdominal radiograph.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred paired radiograph and ultrasound scans in 82 newborn infants were analyzed. Each radiograph was reviewed independently by an experienced neonatologist who recorded the position of the umbilical venous catheter tip by vertebral level and by the cardiac silhouette method. For each method, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the prediction of the true position of the catheter tip on ultrasound. The umbilical venous catheter tip was well positioned in just 28 of 200 scans. The cardiac silhouette method was superior to the vertebral level method for all test variables, with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 94% compared with 61% and 74%. The length of the target zone approximates to a single T8 vertebral body height on radiograph.
CONCLUSIONS: For radiograph and ultrasound scans performed within an hour of each other, the cardiac silhouette method more accurately predicts umbilical venous catheter tip than vertebral body level and methods described in previous studies. Catheters are frequently malpositioned. The length of the target zone for optimal umbilical venous catheter tip position is short. Ultrasound assessment of umbilical venous catheter tip position is quick.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24141654     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829f5efa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  6 in total

1.  Simple measurements to place umbilical catheters using surface anatomy.

Authors:  A O Gupta; M R Peesay; J Ramasethu
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Automatic Catheter and Tube Detection in Pediatric X-ray Images Using a Scale-Recurrent Network and Synthetic Data.

Authors:  X Yi; Scott Adams; Paul Babyn; Abdul Elnajmi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Inadvertent Migration of Umbilical Venous Catheters Often Leads to Malposition.

Authors:  Gerdina H Dubbink-Verheij; Remco Visser; Ratna N G B Tan; Arno A W Roest; Enrico Lopriore; Arjan B Te Pas
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Pleural effusion caused by a malpositioned umbilical venous catheter in a neonate.

Authors:  Thangaraj Abiramalatha; Manish Kumar; Machilakath Panangandi Shabeer
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-30

5.  Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim Gibson; Rebecca Sharp; Amanda Ullman; Scott Morris; Tricia Kleidon; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Umbilical Venous Catheter Update: A Narrative Review Including Ultrasound and Training.

Authors:  Vito D'Andrea; Giorgia Prontera; Serena Antonia Rubortone; Lucilla Pezza; Giovanni Pinna; Giovanni Barone; Mauro Pittiruti; Giovanni Vento
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.