Literature DB >> 25611492

Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors.

Aleea L Devitt1, Edwin Monk-Fromont1, Daniel L Schacter2, Donna Rose Addis1.   

Abstract

The constructive nature of memory is generally adaptive, allowing us to efficiently store, process and learn from life events, and simulate future scenarios to prepare ourselves for what may come. However, the cost of a flexibly constructive memory system is the occasional conjunction error, whereby the components of an event are authentic, but the combination of those components is false. Using a novel recombination paradigm, it was demonstrated that details from one autobiographical memory (AM) may be incorrectly incorporated into another, forming AM conjunction errors that elude typical reality monitoring checks. The factors that contribute to the creation of these conjunction errors were examined across two experiments. Conjunction errors were more likely to occur when the corresponding details were partially rather than fully recombined, likely due to increased plausibility and ease of simulation of partially recombined scenarios. Brief periods of imagination increased conjunction error rates, in line with the imagination inflation effect. Subjective ratings suggest that this inflation is due to similarity of phenomenological experience between conjunction and authentic memories, consistent with a source monitoring perspective. Moreover, objective scoring of memory content indicates that increased perceptual detail may be particularly important for the formation of AM conjunction errors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autobiographical memory; False memory; Imagination; Memory conjunction error; Phenomenology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25611492      PMCID: PMC4511726          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.998680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  40 in total

1.  Changing beliefs about implausible autobiographical events: a little plausibility goes a long way.

Authors:  G A Mazzoni; E F Loftus; I Kirsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2001-03

2.  When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; James C Bartlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

3.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 4.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Memory conjunction errors for autobiographical events: more than just familiarity.

Authors:  Timothy N Odegard; James M Lampinen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-05

Review 6.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  False recollection of the role played by an actor in an event.

Authors:  Alan W Kersten; Julie L Earles; Christin Upshaw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

8.  True and intentionally fabricated memories.

Authors:  Lucy V Justice; Catriona M Morrison; Martin A Conway
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval.

Authors:  Brian Levine; Eva Svoboda; Janine F Hay; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-12

10.  Imagination can create false autobiographical memories.

Authors:  Giuliana Mazzoni; Amina Memon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Lynette Tippett; Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

3.  Nonprobative photos rapidly lead people to believe claims about their own (and other people's) pasts.

Authors:  Brittany A Cardwell; Linda A Henkel; Maryanne Garry; Eryn J Newman; Jeffrey L Foster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

4.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: Identifying and enhancing the contribution of episodic memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Kevin P Madore
Journal:  Mem Stud       Date:  2016-06-30

5.  Flexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories.

Authors:  Alexis C Carpenter; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.

Authors:  Alexis C Carpenter; Preston P Thakral; Alison R Preston; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.