Literature DB >> 27918169

Flexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories.

Alexis C Carpenter1, Daniel L Schacter1.   

Abstract

Episodic memory involves flexible retrieval processes that allow us to link together distinct episodes, make novel inferences across overlapping events, and recombine elements of past experiences when imagining future events. However, the same flexible retrieval and recombination processes that underpin these adaptive functions may also leave memory prone to error or distortion, such as source misattributions in which details of one event are mistakenly attributed to another related event. To determine whether the same recombination-related retrieval mechanism supports both successful inference and source memory errors, we developed a modified version of an associative inference paradigm in which participants encoded everyday scenes comprised of people, objects, and other contextual details. These scenes contained overlapping elements (AB, BC) that could later be linked to support novel inferential retrieval regarding elements that had not appeared together previously (AC). Our critical experimental manipulation concerned whether contextual details were probed before or after the associative inference test, thereby allowing us to assess whether (a) false memories increased for successful versus unsuccessful inferences, and (b) any such effects were specific to after compared with before participants received the inference test. In each of 4 experiments that used variants of this paradigm, participants were more susceptible to false memories for contextual details after successful than unsuccessful inferential retrieval, but only when contextual details were probed after the associative inference test. These results suggest that the retrieval-mediated recombination mechanism that underlies associative inference also contributes to source misattributions that result from combining elements of distinct episodes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27918169      PMCID: PMC5334182          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  43 in total

1.  Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Yael Shrager; Nicole M Dudukovic; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information.

Authors:  Almut Hupbach; Rebecca Gomez; Oliver Hardt; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.

Authors:  Yoko Okado; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Integrating memories in the human brain: hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events.

Authors:  Daphna Shohamy; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Memory conjunction errors for autobiographical events: more than just familiarity.

Authors:  Timothy N Odegard; James M Lampinen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-05

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Ayanna K Thomas; John B Bulevich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11-25

Review 10.  The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Remembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past.

Authors:  Peggy L St Jacques; Alexis C Carpenter; Karl K Szpunar; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Roland G Benoit; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-06-20

5.  Flexible retrieval mechanisms supporting successful inference produce false memories in younger but not older adults.

Authors:  Alexis C Carpenter; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-02

6.  Adaptive constructive processes: An episodic specificity induction impacts false recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Kevin P Madore; Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-03-04

7.  False memories, false preferences: Flexible retrieval mechanisms supporting successful inference bias novel decisions.

Authors:  Alexis C Carpenter; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-02-08

8.  On the evolution of a functional approach to memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 10.  The seven sins of memory: an update.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.