Literature DB >> 25611214

All cues are not created equal: the case for facilitating the acquisition of typical weighting strategies in children with hearing loss.

Joanna H Lowenstein, Susan Nittrouer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: One task of childhood involves learning to optimally weight acoustic cues in the speech signal in order to recover phonemic categories. This study examined the extent to which spectral degradation, as associated with cochlear implants, might interfere. The 3 goals were to measure, for adults and children, (a) cue weighting with spectrally degraded signals, (b) sensitivity to degraded cues, and (c) word recognition for degraded signals.
METHOD: Twenty-three adults and 36 children (10 and 8 years old) labeled spectrally degraded stimuli from /bɑ/-to-/wɑ/ continua varying in formant and amplitude rise time (FRT and ART). They also discriminated degraded stimuli from FRT and ART continua, and recognized words.
RESULTS: A developmental increase in the weight assigned to FRT in labeling was clearly observed, with a slight decrease in weight assigned to ART. Sensitivity to these degraded cues measured by the discrimination task could not explain variability in cue weighting. FRT cue weighting explained significant variability in word recognition; ART cue weighting did not.
CONCLUSION: Spectral degradation affects children more than adults, but that degradation cannot explain the greater diminishment in children's weighting of FRT. It is suggested that auditory training could strengthen the weighting of spectral cues for implant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25611214      PMCID: PMC4398599          DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  29 in total

1.  Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The stop-glide distinction: acoustic analysis and perceptual effect of variation in syllable amplitude envelope for initial /b/ and /w/.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech perception in infants.

Authors:  P D Eimas; E R Siqueland; P Jusczyk; J Vigorito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Identification of vowels in "vowelless" syllables.

Authors:  J J Jenkins; W Strange; T R Edman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

6.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Developmental aspects of the perception of acoustic cues in determining the voicing feature of final stop consonants.

Authors:  C Wardrip-Fruin; S Peach
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1984 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Cross-language study of perception of the oral-nasal distinction.

Authors:  P S Beddor; W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Learning the phonetic cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction: a comparison of child and adult speech perception.

Authors:  M Greenlee
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1980-10

10.  The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.